gfortran 和 g95 是否仍受支持？
我听说g95不再活跃了。现在最适合使用哪种编译器（如果有最新的概述，我将不胜感激）
I have heard that g95 is no longer active. Which compiler is now the appropriate one to use (I would be grateful for an up-to-date overview)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
截至2010年12月29日，该项目似乎已经结束。自 2010 年 8 月中旬以来，该项目的博客没有任何更新，有关 Andy Vaught 转向竞争编译器供应商 PathScale 的传言一直在流传1，但没有得到证实。 [1]
gfortran 仍然定期更新，我看到有关它的问题经常出现在这里。
我个人对g95的看法是，这只是暂时的挫折，它还会不断发展。我认识一些贡献者，虽然他们对此事没有发言权，但普遍认为这只是暂时的挫折，直到新的“领导者”出现或沃特发声为止。
As of 2010-12-29, the project appears to be dead. There were no updates to the project's blog since the middle of August 2010 and rumors of Andy Vaught's move to competing compiler vendor PathScale have been going around1, but nothing has been confirmed. [1]
gfortran however is still regularly updated, and I see questions regarding it popping up regularly in here.
My personal opinion, regards g95, is that it's just a temporary setback, and that it will be continually developed. I know a few contributors, and although they have no say on the matter, it is a general opinion that this is just a temporery setback until a new "leader" pops up or Vaught speaks up.
截至 2017 年，G95 基本上已消亡多年，近年来仅进行了一些小更新，其中不包含任何新功能。
如果您的程序不使用太多现代（2003 年及以后）Fortran 功能，它仍然是一个有用的编译器。
网站上的最后一次更新日期为“2 月 17 日”，没有年份，并声称是对 coarray 的重大检修（whir 对于大多数用户来说并不那么重要）。缺失的年份似乎是 2013 年（检查 archive.org 后）。
As of 2017 G95 has been essentially dead for many years with just a few small updates in recent years which did not contain any new features.
It still continues to be a useful compiler if your program does not use too many modern (2003 and beyond) Fortran features.
The last update on the website is dated "Feb 17" without year and claims to be a major overhaul of coarrays (whir are not that important to most users). The missing year seems to be 2013 (after checking archive.org).