You could use the Framework Design Studio. Although its actual purpose is to design, review and diff framework assemblies, you can also use it to export the definitions of an assembly to a file (RTF, DOC and XML). I've used it with RTF, DOC seems to hang - at least on my box. The result will be a file with all types (classes, interfaces, etc.) in the assembly nicely colored. Method bodies and other details are omitted, but I think that you didn't want them anyway.
Here is a example showing one FDS' own assemblies as an RTF export in Word:
I should add that FDS is not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, but for doing a "one time" export of even a large assembly it should be OK.
发布评论
评论（1）
您可以使用框架设计工作室。尽管其实际目的是设计、审查和比较框架程序集，但您也可以使用它将程序集的定义导出到文件（RTF、DOC 和 XML）。我已经将它与 RTF 一起使用，DOC 似乎挂在了 - 至少在我的盒子上。结果将是一个文件，其中程序集中的所有类型（类、接口等）都具有漂亮的颜色。方法体和其他细节被省略，但我认为你无论如何都不想要它们。
下面是一个示例，显示一个 FDS 自己的程序集作为 Word 中的 RTF 导出：
我应该补充一点FDS 并不是棚屋中最锋利的工具，但对于“一次性”导出大型装配体来说，它应该没问题。
You could use the Framework Design Studio. Although its actual purpose is to design, review and diff framework assemblies, you can also use it to export the definitions of an assembly to a file (RTF, DOC and XML). I've used it with RTF, DOC seems to hang - at least on my box. The result will be a file with all types (classes, interfaces, etc.) in the assembly nicely colored. Method bodies and other details are omitted, but I think that you didn't want them anyway.
Here is a example showing one FDS' own assemblies as an RTF export in Word:
I should add that FDS is not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, but for doing a "one time" export of even a large assembly it should be OK.