当所需名称已定义时的变量命名约定
当您想要的名称已由语言定义时，是否有命名变量的约定？举个例子，我目前正在编写一个 Lisp 函数，它需要两个参数：min 和 max。 Vim 的语法荧光笔为这些单词着色，所以看起来它们已经是 lisp 函数了。我认为最好为参数指定不同的名称。
我应该使用完全不同的名称吗？ min 和 max 都很简短且具有描述性，所以如果可能的话我想使用它们。我应该使用前缀，例如 myMin 和 myMax 吗？我目前倾向于这个想法。任何建议都会有帮助。
Is there a convention for naming a variable when the name you want is already defined by the language? As an example, I'm currently coding a lisp function that takes two parameters, min and max. Vim's syntax highlighter colors those words though, so it looks like they're already lisp functions. I assume it'd be better to give the parameters different names.
Should I use completely different names? min and max are both short and descriptive though, so I'd like to use them if possible. Should I use a prefix, like myMin and myMax? I'm currently leaning towards that idea. Any suggestions would be helpful.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
如果您正在寻找一种非常通用的命名约定 - 能够与您的语言或框架中保留/定义的所有名称很好地配合的命名约定 - 我真的怀疑这种约定是否实用甚至有用。
我认为你应该根据（常见）具体情况来进行操作。
您的示例看起来像是这种常见情况之一：函数具有两个指定某个值范围的参数可能很常见。好吧，在这种情况下，我可能会选择像
minValue和maxValue这样的名称 - 它们似乎足够抽象，可以在大多数情况下很好地工作。顺便说一句，我不会使用像
my这样的前缀。但是，如果您对 Apps Hungarian 的想法持开放态度（请参阅维基百科上的讨论和 Joel Spolsky 的文章），你的问题的答案会简单得多：只需在参数名称中使用正确的语义前缀（例如xMin和xMax表示 min和最大横坐标值）。If you are looking for a very general naming convention - the one that would work well with all names reserved/defined in your language or framework - I really doubt that such convention would be practical or even useful.
I think you should do it on a (common) case by case basis.
Your example looks like one of such common cases: it probably is quite common for functions to have two parameters specifying some range of values. Well, in that case, I'd probably go with names like
minValueandmaxValue- they seem to be abstract enough to work well in most situations.BTW, I would not use a prefix like
my. However, if you were open to the idea of Apps Hungarian (see discussion on Wikipedia and Joel Spolsky's article), the answer to your question would be much simpler: just use a proper semantic prefix in the names of your parameters (e.g.xMinandxMaxfor min and max abscissa values).