这项任务太复杂，无法自动化。这就像当您有一个 MS WORD 文档并将其另存为 HTML 时 - 您得到的是 HTML，但它充满了混乱，而且多余的标记比所需的大 10 倍。它有效，但很糟糕。
They might be able to make HTML, but can they make clean, efficient HTML. Nope.
Are they smart enough to recognise a menu and use an unordered list, instead of a bunch of DIVs? Nope. Does it know when an image should be a background behind text, or when text should be merged with the background? Are they smart enough to save portions of the artwork as PNG vs. JPG?
This task is far too complex to automate. It's like when you have a MS WORD doc and save it as HTML - you get HTML, but it's full of clutter and superfluous mark-up is 10x larger than it need be. It works, but it's crap.
发布评论
评论（1）
他们也许能够制作 HTML，但他们能否制作干净、高效的 HTML。没有。
他们是否足够聪明，能够识别菜单并使用无序列表，而不是一堆 DIV？没有。它是否知道何时图像应作为文本后面的背景，或者何时应将文本与背景合并？他们是否足够聪明，可以将部分艺术作品保存为 PNG 与 JPG 格式？
这项任务太复杂，无法自动化。这就像当您有一个 MS WORD 文档并将其另存为 HTML 时 - 您得到的是 HTML，但它充满了混乱，而且多余的标记比所需的大 10 倍。它有效，但很糟糕。
They might be able to make HTML, but can they make clean, efficient HTML. Nope.
Are they smart enough to recognise a menu and use an unordered list, instead of a bunch of DIVs? Nope. Does it know when an image should be a background behind text, or when text should be merged with the background? Are they smart enough to save portions of the artwork as PNG vs. JPG?
This task is far too complex to automate. It's like when you have a MS WORD doc and save it as HTML - you get HTML, but it's full of clutter and superfluous mark-up is 10x larger than it need be. It works, but it's crap.