The only thing that I'd call a 'quality tag' would have to be fairly complete. Generally, I would consider a good tag to be short, to the point, but also explain exactly what went on, like so:
"Committed the public directory, containing the new logo (logo.png), the new stylesheet (style1.css), and with the javascript that selects checkboxes of parents if their children are checked in a hierarchical structure (checkheir.js), did some code refactoring, made it more readable, and added comments for easier comprehension -John Doe"
发布评论
评论（1）
我唯一称之为“质量标签”的东西必须相当完整。一般来说，我认为一个好的标签应该简短、切题，但也能准确解释发生了什么，如下所示：
“提交公共目录，包含新徽标（logo.png）、新样式表（style1.css） ），如果他们的孩子在分层结构中被选中，则使用 javascript 选择父母的复选框（checkheir.js），进行了一些代码重构，使其更具可读性，并添加了注释以便于理解 -John Doe”
The only thing that I'd call a 'quality tag' would have to be fairly complete. Generally, I would consider a good tag to be short, to the point, but also explain exactly what went on, like so:
"Committed the public directory, containing the new logo (logo.png), the new stylesheet (style1.css), and with the javascript that selects checkboxes of parents if their children are checked in a hierarchical structure (checkheir.js), did some code refactoring, made it more readable, and added comments for easier comprehension -John Doe"