希望获得有关框架的一些反馈。网络/桌面。在大多数方面，似乎没有太大区别，但网络可以无处不在，而桌面则不能。
然而，对于使用数据库驱动的应用程序的小型用户群来说，其中 70% 的输入来自文件，30% 来自用户。我会从 Camelot Camelot 或 Dabo & 等基于桌面的解决方案中获得更多好处吗？睡衣与 Django、Grok、Plone 或 Pyramid 相匹配？
我将主要基于文档 Django Book 来学习 django，并且学习起来很容易。我想我应该在潜入之前先检查一下它是否最合适。
对于需要显示/输入/报告设施（图表/图形）的数据驱动项目，是否有最适合或“更好的适合”。我看不出这些天使用 Web 框架会失去任何东西，但是所需的输出更多的是基于“业务”逻辑而不是网页，我应该选择哪种途径使用 Web 或桌面，以及是否有更好的选择？
编辑：我找到了另一种可能的解决方案/答案 web2py web2py
Wanting to get some feedback on frameworks. Web/Desktop. It doesn't seem to be much difference in most respects expect web can go everywhere and desktop can't.
For a small user base however using database database driven application, where 70% input would come from files, and 30% for the user. Would I get more benefit from a desktop based solution like Camelot Camelot or Dabo & Pyjamas matched against say Django, Grok, Plone or Pyramid?
I was going to learn django based largely on docs Django Book and apparent ease of learning. Thought i should check first before diving in if its the most appropriate.
For data driven project where display/input/reporting facilites(charts/graphs) required is there a best fit or a "better fit". Can't see that I would loose anything by using a web framework for this these days, but where the desired output is more "business" logic based rather than a web page which avenue should i go web v desktop and if either better option?
Edit: I have found another possible solution/answer web2py web2py
发布评论
评论（1）
我想您会发现 web2py 非常容易学习和使用。请注意，如果需要，您可以轻松地将 web2py 应用程序分发给个人用户，以便像桌面应用程序一样安装在他们自己的计算机上（使用浏览器作为用户界面）——请参阅 此处。用户不需要在计算机上安装任何其他东西（甚至不需要Python），并且web2py本身不需要安装，只需解压即可。
I think you'll find web2py very easy to learn and use. Note, if desired, you can easily distribute your web2py app to individual users for installation on their own computer like a desktop app (using the browser as the user interface) -- see here. The users don't need to have anything else installed on their computer (not even Python), and web2py itself doesn't require installation, just unzipping.