网络摄像头聊天应用程序 - p2p 与 fms
我目前正在开发一个网站,我想在其中保留用户之间的网络摄像头聊天。每个客户都有一个帐户,当需要帮助时可以致电不同的客户。
我正在考虑设置闪存媒体服务器或在客户端之间创建 p2p(cirrus)连接。可以肯定第一个解决方案可以很好地工作,但是托管成本可能要高得多。我担心 p2p 解决方案可能会给用户带来一些问题,因为可能隐藏在某些防火墙后面或位于某些不允许他们与远程计算机创建 p2p 连接的网络中。
您会使用哪一个?
I'm currently developing a website in which I want to stick webcam chats between the users. Each client has an account and can call up a different client when he needs some help.
I'm thinking about setting up a flash media server or creating p2p (cirrus) connections between the clients. Pretty sure that the first solution will work just fine, however the cost of the hosting might be much higher. I'm worried that the p2p solution might cause some problems to the users, as then might be hidden behind some firewalls or be in some networks that don't allow them to create a p2p connection with a remote computer.
Which one would you use?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(3)
我开发过的所有 cam 产品都使用了 FMS,没有任何问题,但如果成本是一个问题,red5 是 FMS 的开源替代品。 http://www.red5.org/
All cam products i have worked on have used FMS without a problem but if cost is an issue red5 is open source alternative to FMS. http://www.red5.org/
使用 Adobe Cirrus 不是一个好主意,因为:
您可以在这里找到我关于媒体服务器的总结:
我想安装 RTMP 服务器
如果您有如有任何疑问,请询问。
Using Adobe Cirrus is not a good idea, because:
You can find my summary about media servers here:
I want to install a RTMP server
If you have any questions, please ask.
Michael Thornburgh 是 RTMFP 的开发者之一,他在 FMS 论坛的帖子中讨论了这个主题。其中包含他在 Adobe MAX 上有关 P2P 的演示的链接。
Michael Thornburgh, one of the people who developed RTMFP, discusses this subject in a thread in the FMS forum. It includes a link to his presentation about P2P at Adobe MAX.