敏捷工具包，值得使用吗？
我正在考虑使用敏捷工具包 ATK4 来升级我正在开发的一些 Web 项目。我真的很喜欢敏捷工具包提出的想法/范式，但我担心文档。
这个敏捷网站的文档很稀疏，而且是蹩脚的英语，并且似乎是对 symfony 文档的“解释”。
据称，敏捷工具包自 1999 年以来一直在开发/生产，但 StackOverflow.com 上关于敏捷的帖子屈指可数，而且 Google 搜索中几乎没有出现任何内容……
简而言之，值得花时间学习敏捷吗？工具包，或者我的时间是否应该更好地花在拥有更多活跃支持社区的框架上？我尝试过一些其他框架，但 ATK 的实现确实很突出......
I'm considering using the Agile Toolkit, ATK4 to upgrade a number of web projects that I'm working on. I really like the idea/paradigm that the Agile Toolkit presents, but I'm worried about documentation.
The agile website's documentation is sparse, in broken English, and seems to 'paraphrase' the symfony documentation.
The agile toolkit alleges to have been in development/production since 1999, yet there are only a handful of StackOverflow.com posts regarding agile, and next to nothing comes up in Google searches...
In short is it worth spending time learning the Agile toolkit, or would my time be better spent on a framework that has more of an active support community? I've tried a few other frameworks, but ATK's implementation really stands out...
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
ATK 最初是作为 Agile Technologies (.ie) 的内部工具诞生的，因此于 1999 年构思，但最近作为双重许可框架推出。
这就是为什么它缺乏一些文档，没有庞大的社区，也没有出现谷歌搜索。
我第一眼看到它的工作方式建议就感到惊讶，所以我就参与了它。该文档已经得到了改进，随着时间的推移，它会变得越来越好，社区也会不断发展。
我有机会与首席开发人员取得联系并相信我，它会变得越来越好。
甚至，作为一个例子，所有 ATK4 的网站都是使用该工具包开发的，并且代码很短并且很容易阅读。
祝你好运！
Initially ATK was born as an internal tool from Agile Technologies (.ie) so that has been conceived in 1999 but it was recently launched as dual licensed framework.
That's why it lacks some documentation and has not a huge community nor appears Googling.
I was amazed at first sight by its working way proposal so that I engaged it. The documentation has been already improved and over the time it will keep getting better and community will grow.
I had the chance to get in touch with the lead developer and trust me, it will get better and better.
Even, as an example all the ATK4's site is developed with the toolkit and the code is short and pretty easy to read.
Good luck!
ATK4确实有很多例子，而且代码简洁明了。它实现了通过php将服务器端和客户端包装成一个综合框架的目标。而且它看起来不错。看来文档确实正在改进。
ATK4 does have many examples, and code is concise and clear. It accomplishes the goal of wrapping server-side and client-side into one comprehensive framework via php. Plus it looks nice. It does appear that documentation is improving.
是的 - 同意其他人的说法 - Romans 在更新文档方面做得很好。我开始直接用 php 编写一个应用程序，但意识到我需要使用 jquery 来获得一个漂亮的、跨浏览器兼容的前端，并且想要一个能够支持它的 php 框架。
我查看了 Yii、Cake 和 CodeIgniter，但 ATK4 似乎确实做到了我想要的。就像任何事情一样，这需要一些时间来适应，而且我对 php 和 ATK4 还比较陌生，但我已经重写了框架中我的应用程序已有的内容，并且代码非常干净 - 所有 html 和 css是分开的，页面代码非常紧凑。与 Jquery 的集成非常棒，我刚刚编写了一个插件，我需要它来让 jqplot 工作以获得漂亮的图表。
Yep - agree with what the others are saying - Romans is doing a great job of getting the documentation updated. I started writing an application in straight php but realised i was going to need to use jquery to get a nice, cross browser compatible front end and wanted a php framework that would support that.
I looked at Yii, Cake and CodeIgniter but ATK4 really seems to do what i wanted. Like anything, it takes a bit of getting used to and i'm still relatively new to both php and ATK4 but i've rewritten what i already had for my application in the framework and the code is so clean - all the html and css are separate and the page code is really compact. The integration with Jquery is great and i've just written a plugin that i needed to get jqplot working for nice looking graphs.