ANTLR:异构 AST 和虚构代币
这是我的第一个问题:)
我想使用 ANTLR 构建一个异构 AST 来实现简单的语法。有不同的接口来表示 AST 节点,例如 IInfiExp、IVariableDecl。 ANTLR 提出了 CommonTree 来保存源代码的所有信息(行号、字符位置等),我想用它作为 AST 接口实现的基础 IInfixExp ...
为了获得 AST以 CommonTree 作为节点类型的输出,我设置:
options {
language = Java;
k = 1;
output = AST;
ASTLabelType = CommonTree;
}
IInifxExp 是:
package toylanguage;
public interface IInfixExp extends IExpression {
public enum Operator {
PLUS, MINUS, TIMES, DIVIDE;
}
public Operator getOperator();
public IExpression getLeftHandSide();
public IExpression getRightHandSide();
}
实现 InfixExp 是:
package toylanguage;
import org.antlr.runtime.Token;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTree;
// IInitializable has only void initialize()
public class InfixExp extends CommonTree implements IInfixExp, IInitializable {
private Operator operator;
private IExpression leftHandSide;
private IExpression rightHandSide;
InfixExp(Token token) {
super(token);
}
@Override
public Operator getOperator() {
return operator;
}
@Override
public IExpression getLeftHandSide() {
return leftHandSide;
}
@Override
public IExpression getRightHandSide() {
return rightHandSide;
}
// from IInitializable. get called from ToyTreeAdaptor.rulePostProcessing
@Override
public void initialize() {
// term ((PLUS|MINUS) term)+
// atom ((TIMES|DIIDE) atom)+
// exact 2 children
assert getChildCount() == 2;
// left and right child are IExpressions
assert getChild(0) instanceof IExpression
&& getChild(1) instanceof IExpression;
// operator
switch (token.getType()) {
case ToyLanguageParser.PLUS:
operator = Operator.PLUS;
break;
case ToyLanguageParser.MINUS:
operator = Operator.MINUS;
break;
case ToyLanguageParser.TIMES:
operator = Operator.TIMES;
break;
case ToyLanguageParser.DIVIDE:
operator = Operator.DIVIDE;
break;
default:
assert false;
}
// left and right operands
leftHandSide = (IExpression) getChild(0);
rightHandSide = (IExpression) getChild(1);
}
}
相应的规则是:
exp // e.g. a+b
: term ((PLUS<InfixExp>^|MINUS<InfixExp>^) term)*
;
term // e.g. a*b
: atom ((TIMES<InfixExp>^|DIVIDE<InfixExp>^) atom)*
;
这很好用,因为 PLUS、MINUS 等是“真正的”标记。
但现在到了想象中的标记:
tokens {
PROGRAM;
}
相应的规则是:
program // e.g. var a, b; a + b
: varDecl* exp
-> ^(PROGRAM<Program> varDecl* exp)
;
这样,ANTLR 就不会创建以 PROGRAM 作为根节点的树。
在解析器中,以下代码创建 Program 实例:
root_1 = (CommonTree)adaptor.becomeRoot(new Program(PROGRAM), root_1);
与 InfixExp 不同,不调用 Program(Token) 构造函数,而是调用 Program(int)。
程序是:
package toylanguage;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import org.antlr.runtime.Token;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTree;
class Program extends CommonTree implements IProgram, IInitializable {
private final LinkedList<IVariableDecl> variableDeclarations = new LinkedList<IVariableDecl>();
private IExpression expression = null;
Program(Token token) {
super(token);
}
public Program(int tokeType) {
// What to do?
super();
}
@Override
public List<IVariableDecl> getVariableDeclarations() {
// don't allow to change the list
return Collections.unmodifiableList(variableDeclarations);
}
@Override
public IExpression getExpression() {
return expression;
}
@Override
public void initialize() {
// program: varDecl* exp;
// at least one child
assert getChildCount() > 0;
// the last one is a IExpression
assert getChild(getChildCount() - 1) instanceof IExpression;
// iterate over varDecl*
int i = 0;
while (getChild(i) instanceof IVariableDecl) {
variableDeclarations.add((IVariableDecl) getChild(i));
i++;
}
// exp
expression = (IExpression) getChild(i);
}
}
你可以看到构造函数:
public Program(int tokeType) {
// What to do?
super();
}
结果是,使用 super() 构建了一个没有令牌的 CommonTree。因此 CommonTreeAdaptor.rulePostProcessing 看到的是一个平面列表,而不是一棵以 Token 作为根的树。
我的 TreeAdaptor 看起来像:
package toylanguage;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeAdaptor;
public class ToyTreeAdaptor extends CommonTreeAdaptor {
public Object rulePostProcessing(Object root) {
Object result = super.rulePostProcessing(root);
// check if needs initialising
if (result instanceof IInitializable) {
IInitializable initializable = (IInitializable) result;
initializable.initialize();
}
return result;
};
}
为了测试我使用的任何东西:
package toylanguage;
import org.antlr.runtime.ANTLRStringStream;
import org.antlr.runtime.CommonTokenStream;
import org.antlr.runtime.RecognitionException;
import org.antlr.runtime.TokenStream;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTree;
import toylanguage.ToyLanguageParser.program_return;
public class Processor {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String input = "var a, b; a + b + 123"; // sample input
ANTLRStringStream stream = new ANTLRStringStream(input);
ToyLanguageLexer lexer = new ToyLanguageLexer(stream);
TokenStream tokens = new CommonTokenStream(lexer);
ToyLanguageParser parser = new ToyLanguageParser(tokens);
ToyTreeAdaptor treeAdaptor = new ToyTreeAdaptor();
parser.setTreeAdaptor(treeAdaptor);
try {
// test with: var a, b; a + b
program_return program = parser.program();
CommonTree root = program.tree;
// prints 'a b (+ a b)'
System.out.println(root.toStringTree());
// get (+ a b), the third child of root
CommonTree third = (CommonTree) root.getChild(2);
// prints '(+ a b)'
System.out.println(third.toStringTree());
// prints 'true'
System.out.println(third instanceof IInfixExp);
// prints 'false'
System.out.println(root instanceof IProgram);
} catch (RecognitionException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
为了完整性,这里是完整的语法:
grammar ToyLanguage;
options {
language = Java;
k = 1;
output = AST;
ASTLabelType = CommonTree;
}
tokens {
PROGRAM;
}
@header {
package toylanguage;
}
@lexer::header {
package toylanguage;
}
program // e.g. var a, b; a + b
: varDecl* exp
-> ^(PROGRAM<Program> varDecl* exp)
;
varDecl // e.g. var a, b;
: 'var'! ID<VariableDecl> (','! ID<VariableDecl>)* ';'!
;
exp // e.g. a+b
: term ((PLUS<InfixExp>^|MINUS<InfixExp>^) term)*
;
term // e.g. a*b
: atom ((TIMES<InfixExp>^|DIVIDE<InfixExp>^) atom)*
;
atom
: INT<IntegerLiteralExp> // e.g. 123
| ID<VariableExp> // e.g. a
| '(' exp ')' -> exp // e.g. (a+b)
;
INT : ('0'..'9')+ ;
ID : ('a'..'z')+ ;
PLUS : '+' ;
MINUS : '-' ;
TIMES : '*' ;
DIVIDE : '/' ;
WS : ('\t' | '\n' | '\r' | ' ')+ { $channel = HIDDEN; } ;
好的,最后一个问题是如何从
program // e.g. var a, b; a + b
: varDecl* exp
-> ^(PROGRAM<Program> varDecl* exp)
;
以 PROGRAM 作为根的树
^(PROGRAM varDecl* exp)
而不是一个平面列表中
(varDecl* exp) ?
获取(抱歉有这么多的代码片段) )
再见顶点
it's my first question here :)
I'd like to build an heterogeneous AST with ANTLR for a simple grammar. There are different Interfaces to represent the AST nodes, e. g. IInfiExp, IVariableDecl. ANTLR comes up with CommonTree to hold all the information of the source code (line number, character position etc.) and I want to use this as a base for the implementations of the AST interfacese IInfixExp ...
In order to get an AST as output with CommonTree as node types, I set:
options {
language = Java;
k = 1;
output = AST;
ASTLabelType = CommonTree;
}
The IInifxExp is:
package toylanguage;
public interface IInfixExp extends IExpression {
public enum Operator {
PLUS, MINUS, TIMES, DIVIDE;
}
public Operator getOperator();
public IExpression getLeftHandSide();
public IExpression getRightHandSide();
}
and the implementation InfixExp is:
package toylanguage;
import org.antlr.runtime.Token;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTree;
// IInitializable has only void initialize()
public class InfixExp extends CommonTree implements IInfixExp, IInitializable {
private Operator operator;
private IExpression leftHandSide;
private IExpression rightHandSide;
InfixExp(Token token) {
super(token);
}
@Override
public Operator getOperator() {
return operator;
}
@Override
public IExpression getLeftHandSide() {
return leftHandSide;
}
@Override
public IExpression getRightHandSide() {
return rightHandSide;
}
// from IInitializable. get called from ToyTreeAdaptor.rulePostProcessing
@Override
public void initialize() {
// term ((PLUS|MINUS) term)+
// atom ((TIMES|DIIDE) atom)+
// exact 2 children
assert getChildCount() == 2;
// left and right child are IExpressions
assert getChild(0) instanceof IExpression
&& getChild(1) instanceof IExpression;
// operator
switch (token.getType()) {
case ToyLanguageParser.PLUS:
operator = Operator.PLUS;
break;
case ToyLanguageParser.MINUS:
operator = Operator.MINUS;
break;
case ToyLanguageParser.TIMES:
operator = Operator.TIMES;
break;
case ToyLanguageParser.DIVIDE:
operator = Operator.DIVIDE;
break;
default:
assert false;
}
// left and right operands
leftHandSide = (IExpression) getChild(0);
rightHandSide = (IExpression) getChild(1);
}
}
The corresponding rules are:
exp // e.g. a+b
: term ((PLUS<InfixExp>^|MINUS<InfixExp>^) term)*
;
term // e.g. a*b
: atom ((TIMES<InfixExp>^|DIVIDE<InfixExp>^) atom)*
;
This works fine, becouse PLUS, MINUS etc. are "real" tokens.
But now comes to the imaginary token:
tokens {
PROGRAM;
}
The corresponding rule is:
program // e.g. var a, b; a + b
: varDecl* exp
-> ^(PROGRAM<Program> varDecl* exp)
;
With this, ANTLR doesn't create a tree with PROGRAM as root node.
In the parser, the following code creates the Program instance:
root_1 = (CommonTree)adaptor.becomeRoot(new Program(PROGRAM), root_1);
Unlike InfixExp not the Program(Token) constructor but Program(int) is invoked.
Program is:
package toylanguage;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import org.antlr.runtime.Token;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTree;
class Program extends CommonTree implements IProgram, IInitializable {
private final LinkedList<IVariableDecl> variableDeclarations = new LinkedList<IVariableDecl>();
private IExpression expression = null;
Program(Token token) {
super(token);
}
public Program(int tokeType) {
// What to do?
super();
}
@Override
public List<IVariableDecl> getVariableDeclarations() {
// don't allow to change the list
return Collections.unmodifiableList(variableDeclarations);
}
@Override
public IExpression getExpression() {
return expression;
}
@Override
public void initialize() {
// program: varDecl* exp;
// at least one child
assert getChildCount() > 0;
// the last one is a IExpression
assert getChild(getChildCount() - 1) instanceof IExpression;
// iterate over varDecl*
int i = 0;
while (getChild(i) instanceof IVariableDecl) {
variableDeclarations.add((IVariableDecl) getChild(i));
i++;
}
// exp
expression = (IExpression) getChild(i);
}
}
you can see the constructor:
public Program(int tokeType) {
// What to do?
super();
}
as a result of it, with super() a CommonTree ist build without a token. So CommonTreeAdaptor.rulePostProcessing see a flat list, not a tree with a Token as root.
My TreeAdaptor looks like:
package toylanguage;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeAdaptor;
public class ToyTreeAdaptor extends CommonTreeAdaptor {
public Object rulePostProcessing(Object root) {
Object result = super.rulePostProcessing(root);
// check if needs initialising
if (result instanceof IInitializable) {
IInitializable initializable = (IInitializable) result;
initializable.initialize();
}
return result;
};
}
And to test anything I use:
package toylanguage;
import org.antlr.runtime.ANTLRStringStream;
import org.antlr.runtime.CommonTokenStream;
import org.antlr.runtime.RecognitionException;
import org.antlr.runtime.TokenStream;
import org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTree;
import toylanguage.ToyLanguageParser.program_return;
public class Processor {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String input = "var a, b; a + b + 123"; // sample input
ANTLRStringStream stream = new ANTLRStringStream(input);
ToyLanguageLexer lexer = new ToyLanguageLexer(stream);
TokenStream tokens = new CommonTokenStream(lexer);
ToyLanguageParser parser = new ToyLanguageParser(tokens);
ToyTreeAdaptor treeAdaptor = new ToyTreeAdaptor();
parser.setTreeAdaptor(treeAdaptor);
try {
// test with: var a, b; a + b
program_return program = parser.program();
CommonTree root = program.tree;
// prints 'a b (+ a b)'
System.out.println(root.toStringTree());
// get (+ a b), the third child of root
CommonTree third = (CommonTree) root.getChild(2);
// prints '(+ a b)'
System.out.println(third.toStringTree());
// prints 'true'
System.out.println(third instanceof IInfixExp);
// prints 'false'
System.out.println(root instanceof IProgram);
} catch (RecognitionException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
For completeness, here is the full grammar:
grammar ToyLanguage;
options {
language = Java;
k = 1;
output = AST;
ASTLabelType = CommonTree;
}
tokens {
PROGRAM;
}
@header {
package toylanguage;
}
@lexer::header {
package toylanguage;
}
program // e.g. var a, b; a + b
: varDecl* exp
-> ^(PROGRAM<Program> varDecl* exp)
;
varDecl // e.g. var a, b;
: 'var'! ID<VariableDecl> (','! ID<VariableDecl>)* ';'!
;
exp // e.g. a+b
: term ((PLUS<InfixExp>^|MINUS<InfixExp>^) term)*
;
term // e.g. a*b
: atom ((TIMES<InfixExp>^|DIVIDE<InfixExp>^) atom)*
;
atom
: INT<IntegerLiteralExp> // e.g. 123
| ID<VariableExp> // e.g. a
| '(' exp ')' -> exp // e.g. (a+b)
;
INT : ('0'..'9')+ ;
ID : ('a'..'z')+ ;
PLUS : '+' ;
MINUS : '-' ;
TIMES : '*' ;
DIVIDE : '/' ;
WS : ('\t' | '\n' | '\r' | ' ')+ { $channel = HIDDEN; } ;
OK, the final question is how to get from
program // e.g. var a, b; a + b
: varDecl* exp
-> ^(PROGRAM<Program> varDecl* exp)
;
a tree with PROGRAM as root
^(PROGRAM varDecl* exp)
and not a flat list with
(varDecl* exp) ?
(Sorry for this numerous code fragments)
Ciao Vertex
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
尝试创建以下构造函数:
Try creating the following constructor: