C# performance switch-statement if-statement

比较 if-else、switch-case 和 Contains() 的性能、可读性和可重用性

发布于 2024-11-24 16:51:29 字数 1654 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我有下面的代码（这是一个示例，还有许多其他条件 Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() 是不同的。）。

       if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "updatemustericeki")
        {
            KayitGuncelleme();
        }

        else if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "updatemusterisenedi")
        {
            KayitGuncelleme();
        }           

            ///

        else if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "yenitahsilat")
        {
            YeniKayit();
            Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = "updatetahsilat";
            BaslikLabel.Text = "Tahsilat Güncelle";
        }
        else if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "yeniodeme")
        {
            YeniKayit();
            Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = "updateodeme";
            BaslikLabel.Text = "Ödeme Güncelle";
        }

我想使用 switch-case 或 Contains() 或 switch-case 和 Contains() 重构此代码代码>.

对于 Contains() 我想我可以这样做：

if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString().Contains("update"))
            {
                KayitGuncelleme();
            }
else if(Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString().Contains("yeni")){
YeniKayit();
                Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = "updateodeme";
                BaslikLabel.Text = "Ödeme Güncelle";

}

对于 switch-case 我基本上可以为每种情况编写它。

Switch-case 对于 Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() 的更多条件来说将是多行代码，但是如果我使用 Contains() > 代码行数将会减少。

我还担心性能问题。

就性能、可读性和可重用性而言，哪一个更好？

原文

I have this below code(this is a sample, there are many more other conditions which Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() is different.).

       if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "updatemustericeki")
        {
            KayitGuncelleme();
        }

        else if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "updatemusterisenedi")
        {
            KayitGuncelleme();
        }           

            ///

        else if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "yenitahsilat")
        {
            YeniKayit();
            Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = "updatetahsilat";
            BaslikLabel.Text = "Tahsilat Güncelle";
        }
        else if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() == "yeniodeme")
        {
            YeniKayit();
            Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = "updateodeme";
            BaslikLabel.Text = "Ödeme Güncelle";
        }

I want to refactor this code by using a switch-case or Contains() or switch-case and Contains().

For Contains() I think I can do this:

if (Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString().Contains("update"))
            {
                KayitGuncelleme();
            }
else if(Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString().Contains("yeni")){
YeniKayit();
                Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = "updateodeme";
                BaslikLabel.Text = "Ödeme Güncelle";

}

For switch-case I can basically write it for each case.

Switch-case would be many lines of codes for more conditions of Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() however if I use Contains() there will be lesser number of lines of codes.

I am also concerned about performance issue.

Which one would be better to use regarding performance, readibility and reusability?

分享到QQ

分享到微博

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

需要登录才能够评论，你可以免费注册一个本站的账号。

无远思近则忧 2024-12-01 16:51:29

第一步，停止每次执行 Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString()，获取一次：

string yapPopup = Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString();

然后使用 case 语句：

string nextState = yapPopup; // default to no state change

switch (yapPopup)
{
case "yenitahsilat":
    YeniKayit();
    nextState = "updatetahsilat";
    BaslikLabel.Text = "Tahsilat Güncelle";
    break;

case "yeniodeme":
    YeniKayit();
    nextState = "updateodeme";
    BaslikLabel.Text = "Ödeme Güncelle";
    break;

default:
    if (yapPopup.Contains("update"))
    {
        KayitGuncelleme();
    }
    break;
}

Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = nextState;

请注意，完全匹配会获得自己的 case，任何其他逻辑/测试都发生在 default 情况下。

编辑：“看起来你正在编写一个状态机”（ala Clippy）。请参阅 nextState 变量的使用以使其更加明显。

Massive first step, stop doing Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString() each time, get it once:

string yapPopup = Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"].ToString();

Then use a case statement:

string nextState = yapPopup; // default to no state change

switch (yapPopup)
{
case "yenitahsilat":
    YeniKayit();
    nextState = "updatetahsilat";
    BaslikLabel.Text = "Tahsilat Güncelle";
    break;

case "yeniodeme":
    YeniKayit();
    nextState = "updateodeme";
    BaslikLabel.Text = "Ödeme Güncelle";
    break;

default:
    if (yapPopup.Contains("update"))
    {
        KayitGuncelleme();
    }
    break;
}

Session["Yapilanislem_Popup"] = nextState;

Note that exact matches get their own case, any other logic/testing happens in the default case.

Edit: "It looks like you're writing a state machine" (ala clippy). See use of nextState variable to make it more obvious.

回复收藏 0 原文