VS 2010 Ultimate 与第 3 方实用程序
来自https://stackoverflow.com/questions/273858/software-worth-buying，https://stackoverflow.com/questions/143088/open-source-具有高代码质量的 c 项目 和 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/180939/net-must-have-development-tools，我发现一些软件工具是多次推荐的，例如 Reshaper、dotTrace 和 NDepend。
我使用 Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate，并且它具有一些功能，例如代码覆盖率、分析和 StyleCop 等，而且它非常昂贵。
VS 2010 Ultimate 的用户，是否值得投资我提到的那些工具？或者，它们是否提供 VS 2010 Ultimate 已有的类似功能？
From https://stackoverflow.com/questions/273858/software-worth-buying, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/143088/open-source-c-projects-that-have-high-code-quality and https://stackoverflow.com/questions/180939/net-must-have-development-tools, I found some software tools are multiple recommended such as Reshaper, dotTrace, and NDepend.
I use Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate, and it has some features such as code coverage, profiling, and StyleCop to name a few, and it's pretty expensive.
As a user of VS 2010 Ultimate, is it worth while to invest those tools I mentioned? Or, do they provide similar functionalities that VS 2010 Ultimate already has?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
Prosseek，你问的这个问题很好。我已经测试了 VS 选项和大多数第三方选项。根据我的经验，无论覆盖哪个领域，第三方工具总是更方便。我同意 Ladislav Mrnka 的观点：VS Ultimate 提供了开箱即用的大量功能集，但许多功能就像“基本实现”。
更详细地说：
我对 NDepend 的看法肯定有偏见，因为我是工具团队的一员。一个客观且可衡量的事实是，NDepend 在依赖图和矩阵方面的速度快了 10 到 100 倍，我鼓励您自己验证这一事实（NDepend 附带一个 试用）。另外，在这里您还可以找到一个独立的NDepend 与 VS2010 Arch 的比较。
Prosseek, this is a good question you are asking. I have tested VS options and most of third-party options. From my experience, third-parties tooling are always more convenient whatever the area covered. I agree with Ladislav Mrnka opinions: VS Ultimate provides large feature set out of the box but many features are like "basic implementation".
In more details:
My opinion is certainly biased concerning NDepend since I am part of the tool team. An objective and measurable fact is that NDepend is 10 to 100 times faster concerning dependency graph and matrix and I encourage you to verify this fact by yourself (NDepend comes with a trial). Also, here you'll find an independent comparison of NDepend versus VS2010 Arch.
所有这些工具都有试用版，所以你可以自己尝试一下，你就会看到。 VS Ultimate 提供了大量开箱即用的功能集，但许多功能类似于“基本实现”。这始终与您对这些功能的期望以及您的喜好有关。我喜欢 Resharper，但我与不喜欢它的人一起工作。
All these tools have trial so you can try it yourselves and you will see. VS Ultimate provides large feature set out of the box but many features are like "basic implementation". It is always about what you expect from these features and what you like. I love Resharper but I worked with people who didn't like it.