wap/wml 在 2011 年仍然适用吗？
令我惊讶的是，我找不到这个问题的简短而明确的答案。
WAP/WML 仍然适用于当今的移动 Web/应用程序开发吗？
问候， 米兰科
To my surprise I couldn't find a short and clear answer for this question.
Is WAP/WML still relevant for todays mobile web/app development?
Regards,
Milanko
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
WML 已过时，并且仅由极少数（<5%，可能更少）的活动移动设备使用。 WAP 1.0 同样已经过时，但 WAP 2.0 仍然非常活跃。 2.0 指定 XHTML Mobile Profile 作为其标记，这是完整 XHTML 的缩减版本。
粗略地说，WAP 2.0 实际上只是 HTTP 和 XHTML Mobile Profile 的指定组合。
不过，您可以忘记 WML，除非您确实需要仍然支持诺基亚 7110 型手机。
WML is obsolete, and only used by a very small (<5%, maybe less) of active mobile devices. WAP 1.0 is similarly obsolete, but WAP 2.0 is still very much alive and kicking. 2.0 specifies XHTML Mobile Profile as its markup, which is a cut down version of full XHTML.
Crudely put, WAP 2.0 is really just a specified combo of HTTP and XHTML Mobile Profile.
You can forget WML, though, unless you really need to support Nokia 7110-type phones still.
一般来说，使用WML设备（例如较旧的设备）的用户通常认为他们不能拥有与其他具有彩色屏幕等的设备相同的东西，并且他们的期望较低。
因此，您不会错过那些积极希望您的网站能够在他们的设备上运行的用户。如果您确实支持他们，那么这是一个额外的优势，但其他要求可能会迫使他们尽快升级设备。
Generally, users with WML devices, e.g. older devices, usually accept that they cannot have the same things that other devices with color screens etc can and their expectations are lower.
So you will not be missing out on users that actively expect your site to work on their device. If you do support them, then it's an added advantage, but other requirements will probably force them to upgrade their device as soon as they can.