市场许可示例始终获得许可
尽管在发布商的 中将许可证测试响应
更改为NOT_LICENSED
编辑个人资料页面,我仍然在“市场许可示例”中收到LICENSED
响应。
我没有修改任何“市场许可示例”方式(当然除了强制性的 BASE64_PUBLIC_KEY 并将 com.example
更改为“com.somethingelse”)。
我缺少什么以及如何获得我在发布商帐户中设置的用于测试目的的响应?
Despite changing the License Test Response
to NOT_LICENSED
in the Publisher's Edit Profile page, I am still receiving in the "Market Licensing Example" a LICENSED
response.
I didn't modify the "Market Licensing Example" in any way (except for the mandatory BASE64_PUBLIC_KEY and changing com.example
to 'com.somethingelse' of course).
What am I missing and how do I get the response I set in my Publisher's account for testing purposes?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
回答我自己:
在服务器响应代码表中,它说:
好的,现在的问题是:如果“市场许可示例”总是返回 LICENSED 并且除了草稿之外我无法真正上传它,那么我究竟该如何从“市场许可示例”中学习我需要学习的内容???
这是 catch 22!
Answering myself:
In the Server Response Codes table, it says:
OK, so the question now is: How, on earth, am I supposed to learn what I need to learn from the "Market Licensing Example" if it always returns LICENSED and I cannot really upload it other than draft???
This is catch 22!
如果我使用以开发者帐户作为主帐户的设备(好消息是我周围有几个设备......)或者该帐户已添加为测试帐户(不会全部工作),我可以更改并获得可靠的响应时间)。
不然老是说有VT/GT授权?作为附加项附加,最大长度作为值。
I can change and get a reliable response IF I use a device with the developer account as its main account (good thing I have a couple of devices lying around...) or if the account has been added as test accounts (wouldnt work all the time).
Otherwise it will always say licensed with a VT/GT? attached as an Extra with a max long as value.