多Mapper创建对象层次结构

发布于 2024-11-15 17:36:18 字数 1818 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我已经玩了一段时间了，因为它看起来很像记录的帖子/用户示例，但它略有不同，对我不起作用。

假设以下简化设置（联系人有多个电话号码）：

public class Contact
{
    public int ContactID { get; set; }
    public string ContactName { get; set; }
    public IEnumerable<Phone> Phones { get; set; }
}

public class Phone
{
    public int PhoneId { get; set; }
    public int ContactID { get; set; } // foreign key
    public string Number { get; set; }
    public string Type { get; set; }
    public bool IsActive { get; set; }
}

我希望最终得到返回具有多个电话对象的联系人的结果。这样，如果我有 2 个联系人，每个联系人有 2 部电话，我的 SQL 将返回这些联系人的联接作为总共 4 行的结果集。然后 Dapper 会弹出 2 个联系人对象，每个对象有两部手机。

这是存储过程中的 SQL：

SELECT *
FROM Contacts
    LEFT OUTER JOIN Phones ON Phones.ReferenceId=Contacts.ReferenceId
WHERE clientid=1

我尝试了这个，但最终得到了 4 个元组（这很好，但不是我所希望的......这只是意味着我仍然必须重新规范化结果）

var x = cn.Query<Contact, Phone, Tuple<Contact, Phone>>("sproc_Contacts_SelectByClient",
                              (co, ph) => Tuple.Create(co, ph), 
                                          splitOn: "PhoneId", param: p, 
                                          commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure);

：我尝试另一种方法（如下），出现“无法将类型为‘System.Int32’的对象转换为类型为‘System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1[Phone]’的异常。”

var x = cn.Query<Contact, IEnumerable<Phone>, Contact>("sproc_Contacts_SelectByClient",
                               (co, ph) => { co.Phones = ph; return co; }, 
                                             splitOn: "PhoneId", param: p,
                                             commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure);

我只是做错了什么吗？这看起来就像 posts/owner 的例子，只不过我是从父级到子级而不是从子级到父级。

原文

I've been playing around with this for a bit, because it seems like it feels a lot like the documented posts/users example, but its slightly different and isn't working for me.

Assuming the following simplified setup (a contact has multiple phone numbers):

public class Contact
{
    public int ContactID { get; set; }
    public string ContactName { get; set; }
    public IEnumerable<Phone> Phones { get; set; }
}

public class Phone
{
    public int PhoneId { get; set; }
    public int ContactID { get; set; } // foreign key
    public string Number { get; set; }
    public string Type { get; set; }
    public bool IsActive { get; set; }
}

I'd love to end up with something that returns a Contact with multiple Phone objects. That way, if I had 2 contacts, with 2 phones each, my SQL would return a join of those as a result set with 4 total rows. Then Dapper would pop out 2 contact objects with two phones each.

Here is the SQL in the stored procedure:

SELECT *
FROM Contacts
    LEFT OUTER JOIN Phones ON Phones.ReferenceId=Contacts.ReferenceId
WHERE clientid=1

I tried this, but ended up with 4 Tuples (which is OK, but not what I was hoping for... it just means I still have to re-normalize the result):

var x = cn.Query<Contact, Phone, Tuple<Contact, Phone>>("sproc_Contacts_SelectByClient",
                              (co, ph) => Tuple.Create(co, ph), 
                                          splitOn: "PhoneId", param: p, 
                                          commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure);

and when I try another method (below), I get an exception of "Unable to cast object of type 'System.Int32' to type 'System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1[Phone]'."

var x = cn.Query<Contact, IEnumerable<Phone>, Contact>("sproc_Contacts_SelectByClient",
                               (co, ph) => { co.Phones = ph; return co; }, 
                                             splitOn: "PhoneId", param: p,
                                             commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure);

Am I just doing something wrong? It seems just like the posts/owner example, except that I'm going from the parent to the child instead of the child to the parent.

分享到QQ

分享到微博

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

需要登录才能够评论，你可以免费注册一个本站的账号。

小帐篷 2024-11-22 17:36:18

你没有做错什么，只是 API 不是这样设计的。所有Query API 将始终为每个数据库行返回一个对象。

所以，这对很多人来说都很有效 ->一个方向，但不太好 ->很多多图。

这里有两个问题：

如果我们引入一个适用于您的查询的内置映射器，我们将被期望“丢弃”重复数据。（Contacts.* 在您的查询中重复）
如果我们将其设计为与一个 ->很多对，我们将需要某种身份映射。这增加了复杂性。

举个例子，如果您只需要提取有限数量的记录，则该查询是有效的，如果您将其推至一百万条记录，则会变得更加棘手，因为您需要流式传输并且无法将所有内容加载到内存中：

var sql = "set nocount on
DECLARE @t TABLE(ContactID int,  ContactName nvarchar(100))
INSERT @t
SELECT *
FROM Contacts
WHERE clientid=1
set nocount off 
SELECT * FROM @t 
SELECT * FROM Phone where ContactId in (select t.ContactId from @t t)"

您可以做的是扩展 GridReader 以允许重新映射：

var mapped = cnn.QueryMultiple(sql)
   .Map<Contact,Phone, int>
    (
       contact => contact.ContactID, 
       phone => phone.ContactID,
       (contact, phones) => { contact.Phones = phones };  
    );

假设您扩展 GridReader 并使用映射器：

public static IEnumerable<TFirst> Map<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
    (
    this GridReader reader,
    Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey, 
    Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey, 
    Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
    )
{
    var first = reader.Read<TFirst>().ToList();
    var childMap = reader
        .Read<TSecond>()
        .GroupBy(s => secondKey(s))
        .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());

    foreach (var item in first)
    {
        IEnumerable<TSecond> children;
        if(childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(item), out children))
        {
            addChildren(item,children);
        }
    }

    return first;
}

因为这有点棘手和复杂，但需要注意。我不倾向于将其纳入核心。

You are doing nothing wrong, it is just not the way the API was designed. All the Query APIs will always return an object per database row.

So, this works well on the many -> one direction, but less well for the one -> many multi-map.

There are 2 issues here:

If we introduce a built-in mapper that works with your query, we would be expected to "discard" duplicate data. (Contacts.* is duplicated in your query)
If we design it to work with a one -> many pair, we will need some sort of identity map. Which adds complexity.

Take for example this query which is efficient if you just need to pull a limited number of records, if you push this up to a million stuff get trickier, cause you need to stream and can not load everything into memory:

var sql = "set nocount on
DECLARE @t TABLE(ContactID int,  ContactName nvarchar(100))
INSERT @t
SELECT *
FROM Contacts
WHERE clientid=1
set nocount off 
SELECT * FROM @t 
SELECT * FROM Phone where ContactId in (select t.ContactId from @t t)"

What you could do is extend the GridReader to allow for the remapping:

var mapped = cnn.QueryMultiple(sql)
   .Map<Contact,Phone, int>
    (
       contact => contact.ContactID, 
       phone => phone.ContactID,
       (contact, phones) => { contact.Phones = phones };  
    );

Assuming you extend your GridReader and with a mapper:

public static IEnumerable<TFirst> Map<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
    (
    this GridReader reader,
    Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey, 
    Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey, 
    Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
    )
{
    var first = reader.Read<TFirst>().ToList();
    var childMap = reader
        .Read<TSecond>()
        .GroupBy(s => secondKey(s))
        .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());

    foreach (var item in first)
    {
        IEnumerable<TSecond> children;
        if(childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(item), out children))
        {
            addChildren(item,children);
        }
    }

    return first;
}

Since this is a bit tricky and complex, with caveats. I am not leaning towards including this in core.

回复收藏 0 原文

总以为 2024-11-22 17:36:18

仅供参考 - 我通过执行以下操作得到了 Sam 的答案：

首先，我添加了一个名为“Extensions.cs”的类文件。我必须在两个地方将“this”关键字更改为“reader”：

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Dapper;

namespace TestMySQL.Helpers
{
    public static class Extensions
    {
        public static IEnumerable<TFirst> Map<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
            (
            this Dapper.SqlMapper.GridReader reader,
            Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey,
            Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey,
            Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
            )
        {
            var first = reader.Read<TFirst>().ToList();
            var childMap = reader
                .Read<TSecond>()
                .GroupBy(s => secondKey(s))
                .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());

            foreach (var item in first)
            {
                IEnumerable<TSecond> children;
                if (childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(item), out children))
                {
                    addChildren(item, children);
                }
            }

            return first;
        }
    }
}

其次，我添加了以下方法，修改了最后一个参数：

public IEnumerable<Contact> GetContactsAndPhoneNumbers()
{
    var sql = @"
SELECT * FROM Contacts WHERE clientid=1
SELECT * FROM Phone where ContactId in (select ContactId FROM Contacts WHERE clientid=1)";

    using (var connection = GetOpenConnection())
    {
        var mapped = connection.QueryMultiple(sql)    
            .Map<Contact,Phone, int>     (        
            contact => contact.ContactID,        
            phone => phone.ContactID,
            (contact, phones) => { contact.Phones = phones; }      
        ); 
        return mapped;
    }
}

FYI - I got Sam's answer working by doing the following:

First, I added a class file called "Extensions.cs". I had to change the "this" keyword to "reader" in two places:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Dapper;

namespace TestMySQL.Helpers
{
    public static class Extensions
    {
        public static IEnumerable<TFirst> Map<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
            (
            this Dapper.SqlMapper.GridReader reader,
            Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey,
            Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey,
            Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
            )
        {
            var first = reader.Read<TFirst>().ToList();
            var childMap = reader
                .Read<TSecond>()
                .GroupBy(s => secondKey(s))
                .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());

            foreach (var item in first)
            {
                IEnumerable<TSecond> children;
                if (childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(item), out children))
                {
                    addChildren(item, children);
                }
            }

            return first;
        }
    }
}

Second, I added the following method, modifying the last parameter:

public IEnumerable<Contact> GetContactsAndPhoneNumbers()
{
    var sql = @"
SELECT * FROM Contacts WHERE clientid=1
SELECT * FROM Phone where ContactId in (select ContactId FROM Contacts WHERE clientid=1)";

    using (var connection = GetOpenConnection())
    {
        var mapped = connection.QueryMultiple(sql)    
            .Map<Contact,Phone, int>     (        
            contact => contact.ContactID,        
            phone => phone.ContactID,
            (contact, phones) => { contact.Phones = phones; }      
        ); 
        return mapped;
    }
}

回复收藏 0 原文

小情绪 2024-11-22 17:36:18

查看 https://www.tritac.com/blog/dappernet-by-example/
你可以这样做：

public class Shop {
  public int? Id {get;set;}
  public string Name {get;set;}
  public string Url {get;set;}
  public IList<Account> Accounts {get;set;}
}

public class Account {
  public int? Id {get;set;}
  public string Name {get;set;}
  public string Address {get;set;}
  public string Country {get;set;}
  public int ShopId {get;set;}
}

var lookup = new Dictionary<int, Shop>()
conn.Query<Shop, Account, Shop>(@"
                  SELECT s.*, a.*
                  FROM Shop s
                  INNER JOIN Account a ON s.ShopId = a.ShopId                    
                  ", (s, a) => {
                       Shop shop;
                       if (!lookup.TryGetValue(s.Id, out shop)) {
                           lookup.Add(s.Id, shop = s);
                       }
                       shop.Accounts.Add(a);
                       return shop;
                   },
                   ).AsQueryable();
var resultList = lookup.Values;

我从 dapper.net 测试中得到了这个：

Check out https://www.tritac.com/blog/dappernet-by-example/
You could do something like this:

public class Shop {
  public int? Id {get;set;}
  public string Name {get;set;}
  public string Url {get;set;}
  public IList<Account> Accounts {get;set;}
}

public class Account {
  public int? Id {get;set;}
  public string Name {get;set;}
  public string Address {get;set;}
  public string Country {get;set;}
  public int ShopId {get;set;}
}

var lookup = new Dictionary<int, Shop>()
conn.Query<Shop, Account, Shop>(@"
                  SELECT s.*, a.*
                  FROM Shop s
                  INNER JOIN Account a ON s.ShopId = a.ShopId                    
                  ", (s, a) => {
                       Shop shop;
                       if (!lookup.TryGetValue(s.Id, out shop)) {
                           lookup.Add(s.Id, shop = s);
                       }
                       shop.Accounts.Add(a);
                       return shop;
                   },
                   ).AsQueryable();
var resultList = lookup.Values;

I got this from the dapper.net tests: https://code.google.com/p/dapper-dot-net/source/browse/Tests/Tests.cs#1343

回复收藏 0 原文

浮生面具三千个 2024-11-22 17:36:18

多结果集支持

在您的情况下，拥有多结果集查询会更好（也更容易）。这仅仅意味着您应该编写两个选择语句：

一个返回联系人
，一个返回他们的电话号码，

这样您的对象将是唯一的并且不会重复。

回复收藏 0 原文

故事还在继续 2024-11-22 17:36:18

这是一个非常易于使用的可重复使用的解决方案。这是对安德鲁斯答案的轻微修改。

public static IEnumerable<TParent> QueryParentChild<TParent, TChild, TParentKey>(
    this IDbConnection connection,
    string sql,
    Func<TParent, TParentKey> parentKeySelector,
    Func<TParent, IList<TChild>> childSelector,
    dynamic param = null, IDbTransaction transaction = null, bool buffered = true, string splitOn = "Id", int? commandTimeout = null, CommandType? commandType = null)
{
    Dictionary<TParentKey, TParent> cache = new Dictionary<TParentKey, TParent>();

    connection.Query<TParent, TChild, TParent>(
        sql,
        (parent, child) =>
            {
                if (!cache.ContainsKey(parentKeySelector(parent)))
                {
                    cache.Add(parentKeySelector(parent), parent);
                }

                TParent cachedParent = cache[parentKeySelector(parent)];
                IList<TChild> children = childSelector(cachedParent);
                children.Add(child);
                return cachedParent;
            },
        param as object, transaction, buffered, splitOn, commandTimeout, commandType);

    return cache.Values;
}

用法示例

public class Contact
{
    public int ContactID { get; set; }
    public string ContactName { get; set; }
    public List<Phone> Phones { get; set; } // must be IList

    public Contact()
    {
        this.Phones = new List<Phone>(); // POCO is responsible for instantiating child list
    }
}

public class Phone
{
    public int PhoneID { get; set; }
    public int ContactID { get; set; } // foreign key
    public string Number { get; set; }
    public string Type { get; set; }
    public bool IsActive { get; set; }
}

conn.QueryParentChild<Contact, Phone, int>(
    "SELECT * FROM Contact LEFT OUTER JOIN Phone ON Contact.ContactID = Phone.ContactID",
    contact => contact.ContactID,
    contact => contact.Phones,
    splitOn: "PhoneId");

Here's a reusable solution that is pretty easy to use. It is a slight modification of Andrews answer.

public static IEnumerable<TParent> QueryParentChild<TParent, TChild, TParentKey>(
    this IDbConnection connection,
    string sql,
    Func<TParent, TParentKey> parentKeySelector,
    Func<TParent, IList<TChild>> childSelector,
    dynamic param = null, IDbTransaction transaction = null, bool buffered = true, string splitOn = "Id", int? commandTimeout = null, CommandType? commandType = null)
{
    Dictionary<TParentKey, TParent> cache = new Dictionary<TParentKey, TParent>();

    connection.Query<TParent, TChild, TParent>(
        sql,
        (parent, child) =>
            {
                if (!cache.ContainsKey(parentKeySelector(parent)))
                {
                    cache.Add(parentKeySelector(parent), parent);
                }

                TParent cachedParent = cache[parentKeySelector(parent)];
                IList<TChild> children = childSelector(cachedParent);
                children.Add(child);
                return cachedParent;
            },
        param as object, transaction, buffered, splitOn, commandTimeout, commandType);

    return cache.Values;
}

Example usage

public class Contact
{
    public int ContactID { get; set; }
    public string ContactName { get; set; }
    public List<Phone> Phones { get; set; } // must be IList

    public Contact()
    {
        this.Phones = new List<Phone>(); // POCO is responsible for instantiating child list
    }
}

public class Phone
{
    public int PhoneID { get; set; }
    public int ContactID { get; set; } // foreign key
    public string Number { get; set; }
    public string Type { get; set; }
    public bool IsActive { get; set; }
}

conn.QueryParentChild<Contact, Phone, int>(
    "SELECT * FROM Contact LEFT OUTER JOIN Phone ON Contact.ContactID = Phone.ContactID",
    contact => contact.ContactID,
    contact => contact.Phones,
    splitOn: "PhoneId");

回复收藏 0 原文

只涨不跌 2024-11-22 17:36:18

基于 Sam Saffron（和 Mike Gleason）的方法，这里有一个允许多个子级和多个级别的解决方案。

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Dapper;

namespace TestMySQL.Helpers
{
    public static class Extensions
    {
        public static IEnumerable<TFirst> MapChild<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
            (
            this SqlMapper.GridReader reader,
            List<TFirst> parent,
            List<TSecond> child,
            Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey,
            Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey,
            Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
            )
        {
            var childMap = child
                .GroupBy(secondKey)
                .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());
            foreach (var item in parent)
            {
                IEnumerable<TSecond> children;
                if (childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(item), out children))
                {
                    addChildren(item, children);
                }
            }
            return parent;
        }
    }
}

然后你可以让它在函数之外读取。

using (var multi = conn.QueryMultiple(sql))
{
    var contactList = multi.Read<Contact>().ToList();
    var phoneList = multi.Read<Phone>().ToList;
    contactList = multi.MapChild
        (
            contactList,
            phoneList,
            contact => contact.Id, 
            phone => phone.ContactId,
            (contact, phone) => {contact.Phone = phone;}
        ).ToList();
    return contactList;
}

然后可以使用相同的父对象为下一个子对象再次调用映射函数。您还可以独立于地图在父或子读取语句上实现分割功能。

这是一个“单到N”的附加扩展方法

    public static TFirst MapChildren<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
        (
        this SqlMapper.GridReader reader,
        TFirst parent,
        IEnumerable<TSecond> children,
        Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey,
        Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey,
        Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
        )
    {
        if (parent == null || children == null || !children.Any())
        {
            return parent;
        }

        Dictionary<TKey, IEnumerable<TSecond>> childMap = children
            .GroupBy(secondKey)
            .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());

        if (childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(parent), out IEnumerable<TSecond> foundChildren))
        {
            addChildren(parent, foundChildren);
        }

        return parent;
    }

Based on Sam Saffron's (and Mike Gleason's) approach, here is a solution which will allow for multiple children and multiple levels.

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Dapper;

namespace TestMySQL.Helpers
{
    public static class Extensions
    {
        public static IEnumerable<TFirst> MapChild<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
            (
            this SqlMapper.GridReader reader,
            List<TFirst> parent,
            List<TSecond> child,
            Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey,
            Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey,
            Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
            )
        {
            var childMap = child
                .GroupBy(secondKey)
                .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());
            foreach (var item in parent)
            {
                IEnumerable<TSecond> children;
                if (childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(item), out children))
                {
                    addChildren(item, children);
                }
            }
            return parent;
        }
    }
}

Then you can have it read outside of the function.

using (var multi = conn.QueryMultiple(sql))
{
    var contactList = multi.Read<Contact>().ToList();
    var phoneList = multi.Read<Phone>().ToList;
    contactList = multi.MapChild
        (
            contactList,
            phoneList,
            contact => contact.Id, 
            phone => phone.ContactId,
            (contact, phone) => {contact.Phone = phone;}
        ).ToList();
    return contactList;
}

The map function can then be called again for the next child object using the same parent object. You can also implement splits on the parent or child read statements independently of the map function.

Here is a 'single to N' additional extension method

    public static TFirst MapChildren<TFirst, TSecond, TKey>
        (
        this SqlMapper.GridReader reader,
        TFirst parent,
        IEnumerable<TSecond> children,
        Func<TFirst, TKey> firstKey,
        Func<TSecond, TKey> secondKey,
        Action<TFirst, IEnumerable<TSecond>> addChildren
        )
    {
        if (parent == null || children == null || !children.Any())
        {
            return parent;
        }

        Dictionary<TKey, IEnumerable<TSecond>> childMap = children
            .GroupBy(secondKey)
            .ToDictionary(g => g.Key, g => g.AsEnumerable());

        if (childMap.TryGetValue(firstKey(parent), out IEnumerable<TSecond> foundChildren))
        {
            addChildren(parent, foundChildren);
        }

        return parent;
    }

回复收藏 0 原文

隐诗 2024-11-22 17:36:18

一旦我们决定将 DataAccessLayer 移至存储过程，这些过程通常会返回多个链接结果（示例如下）。

嗯，我的方法几乎相同，但可能更舒服一些。

您的代码可能如下所示：

using ( var conn = GetConn() )
{
    var res = await conn
        .StoredProc<Person>( procName, procParams )
        .Include<Book>( ( p, b ) => p.Books = b.Where( x => x.PersonId == p.Id ).ToList() )
        .Include<Course>( ( p, c ) => p.Courses = c.Where( x => x.PersonId == p.Id ).ToList() )
        .Include<Course, Mark>( ( c, m ) => c.Marks = m.Where( x => x.CourseId == c.Id ).ToList() )
        .Execute();
}

Let's break it down...

扩展：

public static class SqlExtensions
{
    public static StoredProcMapper<T> StoredProc<T>( this SqlConnection conn, string procName, object procParams )
    {
        return StoredProcMapper<T>
            .Create( conn )
            .Call( procName, procParams );
    }
}

映射器：

public class StoredProcMapper<T>
{
    public static StoredProcMapper<T> Create( SqlConnection conn )
    {
        return new StoredProcMapper<T>( conn );
    }

    private List<MergeInfo> _merges = new List<MergeInfo>();

    public SqlConnection Connection { get; }
    public string ProcName { get; private set; }
    public object Parameters { get; private set; }

    private StoredProcMapper( SqlConnection conn )
    {
        Connection = conn;
        _merges.Add( new MergeInfo( typeof( T ) ) );
    }

    public StoredProcMapper<T> Call( object procName, object parameters )
    {
        ProcName = procName.ToString();
        Parameters = parameters;

        return this;
    }

    public StoredProcMapper<T> Include<TChild>( MergeDelegate<T, TChild> mapper )
    {
        return Include<T, TChild>( mapper );
    }

    public StoredProcMapper<T> Include<TParent, TChild>( MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild> mapper )
    {
        _merges.Add( new MergeInfo<TParent, TChild>( mapper ) );
        return this;
    }

    public async Task<List<T>> Execute()
    {
        if ( string.IsNullOrEmpty( ProcName ) )
            throw new Exception( $"Procedure name not specified! Please use '{nameof(Call)}' method before '{nameof( Execute )}'" );

        var gridReader = await Connection.QueryMultipleAsync( 
            ProcName, Parameters, commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure );

        foreach ( var merge in _merges )
        {
            merge.Result = gridReader
                .Read( merge.Type )
                .ToList();
        }

        foreach ( var merge in _merges )
        {
            if ( merge.ParentType == null )
                continue;

            var parentMerge = _merges.FirstOrDefault( x => x.Type == merge.ParentType );

            if ( parentMerge == null )
                throw new Exception( $"Wrong parent type '{merge.ParentType.FullName}' for type '{merge.Type.FullName}'." );

            foreach ( var parent in parentMerge.Result )
            {
                merge.Merge( parent, merge.Result );
            }
        }

        return _merges
            .First()
            .Result
            .Cast<T>()
            .ToList();
    }

    private class MergeInfo
    {
        public Type Type { get; }
        public Type ParentType { get; }
        public IEnumerable Result { get; set; }

        public MergeInfo( Type type, Type parentType = null )
        {
            Type = type;
            ParentType = parentType;
        }

        public void Merge( object parent, IEnumerable children )
        {
            MergeInternal( parent, children );
        }

        public virtual void MergeInternal( object parent, IEnumerable children )
        {

        }
    }

    private class MergeInfo<TParent, TChild> : MergeInfo
    {
        public MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild> Action { get; }

        public MergeInfo( MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild> mergeAction )
            : base( typeof( TChild ), typeof( TParent ) )
        {
            Action = mergeAction;
        }

        public override void MergeInternal( object parent, IEnumerable children )
        {
            Action( (TParent)parent, children.Cast<TChild>() );
        }
    }

    public delegate void MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild>( TParent parent, IEnumerable<TChild> children );
}

就这些，但如果您想进行快速测试，这里有适合您的模型和过程：

模型：

public class Person
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public List<Course> Courses { get; set; }
    public List<Book> Books { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Name;
}

public class Book
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public Guid PersonId { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Name;
}

public class Course
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public Guid PersonId { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public List<Mark> Marks { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Name;
}

public class Mark
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public Guid CourseId { get; set; }
    public int Value { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Value.ToString();
}

SP ：

if exists ( 
    select * 
    from sysobjects 
    where  
        id = object_id(N'dbo.MultiTest')
        and ObjectProperty( id, N'IsProcedure' ) = 1 )
begin
    drop procedure dbo.MultiTest
end
go

create procedure dbo.MultiTest
    @PersonId UniqueIdentifier
as
begin

    declare @tmpPersons table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        Name nvarchar(50)
    );

    declare @tmpBooks table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        PersonId UniqueIdentifier,
        Name nvarchar(50)
    )

    declare @tmpCourses table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        PersonId UniqueIdentifier,
        Name nvarchar(50)
    )

    declare @tmpMarks table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        CourseId UniqueIdentifier,
        Value int
    )

--------------------------------------------------

    insert into @tmpPersons
    values
        ( '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Иван' ),
        ( '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Василий' ),
        ( '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Алефтина' )


    insert into @tmpBooks
    values
        ( NewId(), '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Книга Математика' ),
        ( NewId(), '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Книга Физика' ),
        ( NewId(), '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Книга Геометрия' ),

        ( NewId(), '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Книга Биология' ),
        ( NewId(), '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Книга Химия' ),

        ( NewId(), '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Книга История' ),
        ( NewId(), '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Книга Литература' ),
        ( NewId(), '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Книга Древне-шумерский диалект иврита' )


    insert into @tmpCourses
    values
        ( '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Математика' ),
        ( '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Физика' ),
        ( '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Геометрия' ),

        ( '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Биология' ),
        ( 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Химия' ),

        ( '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'История' ),
        ( '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Литература' ),
        ( '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Древне-шумерский диалект иврита' )

    insert into @tmpMarks
    values
        ( NewId(), '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', 98 ),
        ( NewId(), '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', 87 ),
        ( NewId(), '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', 76 ),

        ( NewId(), '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', 89 ),
        ( NewId(), '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', 78 ),
        ( NewId(), '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', 67 ),

        ( NewId(), '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', 79 ),
        ( NewId(), '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', 68 ),
        ( NewId(), '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', 75 ),
        ----------
        ( NewId(), '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', 198 ),
        ( NewId(), '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', 187 ),
        ( NewId(), '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', 176 ),

        ( NewId(), 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', 189 ),
        ( NewId(), 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', 178 ),
        ( NewId(), 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', 167 ),
        ----------
        ( NewId(), '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', 8 ),
        ( NewId(), '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', 7 ),
        ( NewId(), '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', 6 ),

        ( NewId(), '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', 9 ),
        ( NewId(), '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', 8 ),
        ( NewId(), '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', 7 ),

        ( NewId(), '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', 9 ),
        ( NewId(), '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', 8 ),
        ( NewId(), '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', 5 )

--------------------------------------------------

    select * from @tmpPersons
    select * from @tmpBooks
    select * from @tmpCourses
    select * from @tmpMarks

end
go

Once we decided to move our DataAccessLayer to stored procedures, and these procedures are often return multiple linked results (example below).

Well, my approach is almost the same, but maybe little bit more comfortable.

This is how your code may look like:

using ( var conn = GetConn() )
{
    var res = await conn
        .StoredProc<Person>( procName, procParams )
        .Include<Book>( ( p, b ) => p.Books = b.Where( x => x.PersonId == p.Id ).ToList() )
        .Include<Course>( ( p, c ) => p.Courses = c.Where( x => x.PersonId == p.Id ).ToList() )
        .Include<Course, Mark>( ( c, m ) => c.Marks = m.Where( x => x.CourseId == c.Id ).ToList() )
        .Execute();
}

Let's break it down...

Extension:

public static class SqlExtensions
{
    public static StoredProcMapper<T> StoredProc<T>( this SqlConnection conn, string procName, object procParams )
    {
        return StoredProcMapper<T>
            .Create( conn )
            .Call( procName, procParams );
    }
}

Mapper:

public class StoredProcMapper<T>
{
    public static StoredProcMapper<T> Create( SqlConnection conn )
    {
        return new StoredProcMapper<T>( conn );
    }

    private List<MergeInfo> _merges = new List<MergeInfo>();

    public SqlConnection Connection { get; }
    public string ProcName { get; private set; }
    public object Parameters { get; private set; }

    private StoredProcMapper( SqlConnection conn )
    {
        Connection = conn;
        _merges.Add( new MergeInfo( typeof( T ) ) );
    }

    public StoredProcMapper<T> Call( object procName, object parameters )
    {
        ProcName = procName.ToString();
        Parameters = parameters;

        return this;
    }

    public StoredProcMapper<T> Include<TChild>( MergeDelegate<T, TChild> mapper )
    {
        return Include<T, TChild>( mapper );
    }

    public StoredProcMapper<T> Include<TParent, TChild>( MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild> mapper )
    {
        _merges.Add( new MergeInfo<TParent, TChild>( mapper ) );
        return this;
    }

    public async Task<List<T>> Execute()
    {
        if ( string.IsNullOrEmpty( ProcName ) )
            throw new Exception( $"Procedure name not specified! Please use '{nameof(Call)}' method before '{nameof( Execute )}'" );

        var gridReader = await Connection.QueryMultipleAsync( 
            ProcName, Parameters, commandType: CommandType.StoredProcedure );

        foreach ( var merge in _merges )
        {
            merge.Result = gridReader
                .Read( merge.Type )
                .ToList();
        }

        foreach ( var merge in _merges )
        {
            if ( merge.ParentType == null )
                continue;

            var parentMerge = _merges.FirstOrDefault( x => x.Type == merge.ParentType );

            if ( parentMerge == null )
                throw new Exception( $"Wrong parent type '{merge.ParentType.FullName}' for type '{merge.Type.FullName}'." );

            foreach ( var parent in parentMerge.Result )
            {
                merge.Merge( parent, merge.Result );
            }
        }

        return _merges
            .First()
            .Result
            .Cast<T>()
            .ToList();
    }

    private class MergeInfo
    {
        public Type Type { get; }
        public Type ParentType { get; }
        public IEnumerable Result { get; set; }

        public MergeInfo( Type type, Type parentType = null )
        {
            Type = type;
            ParentType = parentType;
        }

        public void Merge( object parent, IEnumerable children )
        {
            MergeInternal( parent, children );
        }

        public virtual void MergeInternal( object parent, IEnumerable children )
        {

        }
    }

    private class MergeInfo<TParent, TChild> : MergeInfo
    {
        public MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild> Action { get; }

        public MergeInfo( MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild> mergeAction )
            : base( typeof( TChild ), typeof( TParent ) )
        {
            Action = mergeAction;
        }

        public override void MergeInternal( object parent, IEnumerable children )
        {
            Action( (TParent)parent, children.Cast<TChild>() );
        }
    }

    public delegate void MergeDelegate<TParent, TChild>( TParent parent, IEnumerable<TChild> children );
}

That's all, but if you wanna do quick test, here is models and procedure for you:

Models:

public class Person
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public List<Course> Courses { get; set; }
    public List<Book> Books { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Name;
}

public class Book
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public Guid PersonId { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Name;
}

public class Course
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public Guid PersonId { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public List<Mark> Marks { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Name;
}

public class Mark
{
    public Guid Id { get; set; }
    public Guid CourseId { get; set; }
    public int Value { get; set; }

    public override string ToString() => Value.ToString();
}

SP:

if exists ( 
    select * 
    from sysobjects 
    where  
        id = object_id(N'dbo.MultiTest')
        and ObjectProperty( id, N'IsProcedure' ) = 1 )
begin
    drop procedure dbo.MultiTest
end
go

create procedure dbo.MultiTest
    @PersonId UniqueIdentifier
as
begin

    declare @tmpPersons table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        Name nvarchar(50)
    );

    declare @tmpBooks table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        PersonId UniqueIdentifier,
        Name nvarchar(50)
    )

    declare @tmpCourses table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        PersonId UniqueIdentifier,
        Name nvarchar(50)
    )

    declare @tmpMarks table 
    (
        Id UniqueIdentifier,
        CourseId UniqueIdentifier,
        Value int
    )

--------------------------------------------------

    insert into @tmpPersons
    values
        ( '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Иван' ),
        ( '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Василий' ),
        ( '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Алефтина' )


    insert into @tmpBooks
    values
        ( NewId(), '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Книга Математика' ),
        ( NewId(), '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Книга Физика' ),
        ( NewId(), '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Книга Геометрия' ),

        ( NewId(), '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Книга Биология' ),
        ( NewId(), '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Книга Химия' ),

        ( NewId(), '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Книга История' ),
        ( NewId(), '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Книга Литература' ),
        ( NewId(), '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Книга Древне-шумерский диалект иврита' )


    insert into @tmpCourses
    values
        ( '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Математика' ),
        ( '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Физика' ),
        ( '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', '576fb8e8-41a2-43a9-8e77-a8213aa6e387', N'Геометрия' ),

        ( '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Биология' ),
        ( 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', '467953a5-cb5f-4d06-9fad-505b3bba2058', N'Химия' ),

        ( '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'История' ),
        ( '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Литература' ),
        ( '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', '52a719bf-6f1f-48ac-9e1f-4532cfc70d96', N'Древне-шумерский диалект иврита' )

    insert into @tmpMarks
    values
        ( NewId(), '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', 98 ),
        ( NewId(), '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', 87 ),
        ( NewId(), '30945b68-a6ef-4da8-9a35-d3b2845e7de3', 76 ),

        ( NewId(), '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', 89 ),
        ( NewId(), '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', 78 ),
        ( NewId(), '7881f090-ccd6-4fb9-a1e0-ff4ff5c18450', 67 ),

        ( NewId(), '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', 79 ),
        ( NewId(), '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', 68 ),
        ( NewId(), '92bbefd1-9fec-4dc7-bb58-986eadb105c8', 75 ),
        ----------
        ( NewId(), '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', 198 ),
        ( NewId(), '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', 187 ),
        ( NewId(), '923a2f0c-c5c7-4394-847c-c5028fe14711', 176 ),

        ( NewId(), 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', 189 ),
        ( NewId(), 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', 178 ),
        ( NewId(), 'ace50388-eb05-4c46-82a9-5836cf0c988c', 167 ),
        ----------
        ( NewId(), '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', 8 ),
        ( NewId(), '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', 7 ),
        ( NewId(), '53ea69fb-6cc4-4a6f-82c2-0afbaa8cb410', 6 ),

        ( NewId(), '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', 9 ),
        ( NewId(), '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', 8 ),
        ( NewId(), '7290c5f7-1000-4f44-a5f0-6a7cf8a8efab', 7 ),

        ( NewId(), '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', 9 ),
        ( NewId(), '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', 8 ),
        ( NewId(), '73ac366d-c7c2-4480-9513-28c17967db1a', 5 )

--------------------------------------------------

    select * from @tmpPersons
    select * from @tmpBooks
    select * from @tmpCourses
    select * from @tmpMarks

end
go

回复收藏 0 原文

甜扑 2024-11-22 17:36:18

我想分享我对此问题的解决方案，看看是否有人对我使用的方法有任何建设性的反馈？

我正在处理的项目中有一些要求，我需要首先解释一下：

我必须保持 POCO 尽可能干净，因为这些类将在 API 包装器中公开共享。
由于上述要求，我的 POCO 位于单独的类库中。
将有多个对象层次结构级别，这些层次结构级别将根据数据而变化（因此我不能使用通用类型映射器，否则我必须编写大量对象层次结构级别来满足所有可能的事件）

因此，我所做的就是通过返回单个 JSON 字符串作为原始行上的列，让 SQL 处理第 2 级 - 第 n 级层次结构，如下所示（删除其他列/属性等以说明）：

Id  AttributeJson
4   [{Id:1,Name:"ATT-NAME",Value:"ATT-VALUE-1"}]

然后，我的 POCO 的构建如下：

public abstract class BaseEntity
{
    [KeyAttribute]
    public int Id { get; set; }
}

public class Client : BaseEntity
{
    public List<ClientAttribute> Attributes{ get; set; }
}
public class ClientAttribute : BaseEntity
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Value { get; set; }
}

POCO 继承自 BaseEntity。 （为了说明，我选择了一个相当简单的单级层次结构，如客户端对象的“属性”属性所示。）

然后，我在数据层中拥有以下继承的“数据类”来自 POCO 客户端。

internal class dataClient : Client
{
    public string AttributeJson
    {
        set
        {
            Attributes = value.FromJson<List<ClientAttribute>>();
        }
    }
}

正如您在上面看到的，发生的情况是 SQL 返回一个名为“AttributeJson”的列，该列映射到 dataClient 类中的属性 AttributeJson。它只有一个 setter，它将 JSON 反序列化为继承的 Client 类上的 Attributes 属性。 dataClient 类是数据访问层的内部，而ClientProvider（我的数据工厂）将原始 Client POCO 返回到调用应用程序/库，如下所示：

var clients = _conn.Get<dataClient>();
return clients.OfType<Client>().ToList();

请注意，我'我使用 Dapper.Contrib 并添加了一个新的 Get 方法，该方法返回 IEnumerable

此解决方案需要注意以下几点：

JSON 序列化存在明显的性能权衡 - 我已针对具有 2 个子 List 属性的 1050 行进行了基准测试，每个属性在列表中都有 2 个实体，其时钟频率为279ms - 这对于我的项目需求来说是可以接受的 - 这也是 SQL 方面的零优化，所以我应该能够在那里节省一些毫秒。
这确实意味着需要额外的 SQL 查询来为每个必需的 List 属性构建 JSON，但是这又适合我，因为我非常了解 SQL，但不太流利动态/反射等..所以这样我觉得我对事情有更多的控制权，因为我实际上了解幕后发生的事情:-)

很可能有比这个更好的解决方案，如果有的话，我真的很感激听到你的想法 - 这只是我想出的解决方案，到目前为止符合我的需求项目（虽然这是实验阶段的发布）。

I wanted to share my solution to this issue and see if anyone has any constructive feedback on the approach I've used?

I have a few requirements in the project I'm working on which I need to explain first up:

I have to keep my POCO's as clean as possible as these classes will be publicly shared in an API wrapper.
My POCO's are in a seperate Class Library because of the above requirement
There are going to be multiple object hierarchy levels that will vary depending on data (so I cannot use a Generic Type Mapper or I'd have to write tons of them to cater for all possible eventualities)

So, what I have done is to get SQL to handle the 2nd - nth Level heirarchy by returning a Single JSON string as a column on the original row as follows (stripped out the other columns / properties etc to illustrate):

Id  AttributeJson
4   [{Id:1,Name:"ATT-NAME",Value:"ATT-VALUE-1"}]

Then, my POCO's are built up like the below :

public abstract class BaseEntity
{
    [KeyAttribute]
    public int Id { get; set; }
}

public class Client : BaseEntity
{
    public List<ClientAttribute> Attributes{ get; set; }
}
public class ClientAttribute : BaseEntity
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Value { get; set; }
}

Where the POCO's inherit from BaseEntity. (To illustrate I've chosen a fairly simple, single level heirarchy as shown by the "Attributes" property of the client object. )

I then have in my Data Layer the following "Data Class" which inherits from the POCO Client.

internal class dataClient : Client
{
    public string AttributeJson
    {
        set
        {
            Attributes = value.FromJson<List<ClientAttribute>>();
        }
    }
}

As you can see above, whats happening is that SQL is returning a column called "AttributeJson" which is mapped to the property AttributeJson in the dataClient class. This has only a setter which deserialises the JSON to the Attributes property on the inherited Client class. The dataClient Class is internal to the Data Access Layer and the ClientProvider (my data factory) returns the original Client POCO to the calling App / Library like so :

var clients = _conn.Get<dataClient>();
return clients.OfType<Client>().ToList();

Note that I'm using Dapper.Contrib and have added a new Get<T> Method that returns an IEnumerable<T>

There are a couple things to note with this solution:

There's an obvious performance trade off with the JSON serialisation - I've benchmarked this against 1050 rows with 2 sub List<T> properties, each with 2 entities in the list and it clocks in at 279ms - which is acceptable for my projects needs - this is also with ZERO optimisation on the SQL side of things so I should be able to shave a few ms there.
It does mean additional SQL queries are required to build up the JSON for each required List<T> property, but again, this suits me as I know SQL pretty well and am not so fluent on dynamics / reflection etc.. so this way I feel like I have more control over things as I actually understand whats happening under the hood :-)

There may well be a better solution than this one and if there is I would really appreciate hearing your thoughts - this is just the solution I came up with that so far fits my needs for this project (although this is experimental at the stage of posting).

回复收藏 0 原文

紅太極 2024-11-22 17:36:18

摘自learndapper.com - 使用 Dapper 的关系：SplitOn

简洁的 SplitOn
Dapper支持多重映射，可以让你映射
单行到多个对象。如果您需要的话，这会很有帮助
在单个查询中从多个表中检索数据。

给定这些类


public class Product
{
   public int ProductId { get; set; }
   public string ProductName { get; set; }
   public Category Category { get; set; }
}
public class Category
{
   public int CategoryId { get; set; }
   public string CategoryName { get; set; }
   public ICollection<Product> Products { get; set; }
}

你可以使用这个

using (var connection = new SQLiteConnection(connString)){

var sql = @"select productid, productname, p.categoryid, categoryname 
            from products p 
            inner join categories c on p.categoryid = c.categoryid";

var products = await connection.QueryAsync<Product, 
                      Category, 
                      Product>(
                                sql, 
                                (product, category) => {
                                      product.Category = category;
                                      return product;},
                                splitOn: "CategoryId");
products.ToList().ForEach(product => 
Console.WriteLine($"Product: {product.ProductName}, 
                         Category: {product.Category.CategoryName}"));
Console.ReadLine();
}

Taken from learndapper.com - Using Relationships With Dapper: SplitOn

Dapper SplitOn
Dapper supports multi-mapping, which allows you to map
a single row to multiple objects. It is helpful if you need to
retrieve data from multiple tables in a single query.

Given these classes


public class Product
{
   public int ProductId { get; set; }
   public string ProductName { get; set; }
   public Category Category { get; set; }
}
public class Category
{
   public int CategoryId { get; set; }
   public string CategoryName { get; set; }
   public ICollection<Product> Products { get; set; }
}

You can use this

using (var connection = new SQLiteConnection(connString)){

var sql = @"select productid, productname, p.categoryid, categoryname 
            from products p 
            inner join categories c on p.categoryid = c.categoryid";

var products = await connection.QueryAsync<Product, 
                      Category, 
                      Product>(
                                sql, 
                                (product, category) => {
                                      product.Category = category;
                                      return product;},
                                splitOn: "CategoryId");
products.ToList().ForEach(product => 
Console.WriteLine(quot;Product: {product.ProductName}, 
                         Category: {product.Category.CategoryName}"));
Console.ReadLine();
}

回复收藏 0 原文

~没有更多了~