Zenoss - 客户的设备访问控制列表
我们正在评估 Zenoss，并对设备访问控制感兴趣。我们希望设置该系统，以便我们的客户可以访问 Zenoss 并且只能看到他们的设备和状态。此功能显然仅存在于企业版中，如此处所示。
在用户配置页面中有一个“管理对象”部分，但在社区版本中显然没有实际作用。 http://.../zport/manage_access 上还有一个角色和权限配置页面，但是我还没有真正弄清楚如何将它用于这个用例。
谁能给我一些关于如何限制特定用户使用特定设备或设备组的提示？是否需要更改 Zenoss 核心中的大量代码？我们可以用 ZenPack 做到这一点吗？有关于如何执行此操作的示例吗？
提前致谢！
We're evaluating Zenoss and are interested in Device Access Control. We would like to set up the system so that our customers could access Zenoss and only see their devices and status. This feature apparently only exists in the enterprise version as can be seen here.
In the user configuration page there is a "Administered Objects" section but in the community version it has no practical effect, apparently. There is also a roles and permissions configuration page available at http://.../zport/manage_access but I haven't really figured out how to use it for this use case.
Can anyone give me some tips on how we could limit a certain user to certain devices or device groups? Would it require changing a lot of code in the Zenoss core? Can we do that with a ZenPack? Are there any examples on how to do this?
Thanks in advance!
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
我现在正在做这件事。部分问题在于 Zenoss 管理对象概念存在许多错误。我在 Zenoss 论坛上发布了一些发现 http://community.zenoss.org/message/59100 #59100 .我还用 Zenoss 开了一些票（在前面的网址中引用）。如果您可以在票证中添加额外的支持信息，那么可能会提高其优先级。同时，我正在研究我自己的代码修复/ZenPack 解决方法，并且如果您感兴趣的话，几乎已经准备好进行 alpha 测试。
干杯，
简
I am working on this right now. Part of the issue is that there are a number of bugs around the Zenoss Administered Objects concept. I have posted some findings at the Zenoss forum at http://community.zenoss.org/message/59100#59100 . I have also opened a number of tickets with Zenoss (referenced in the previous url). If you can add extra supporting information to the tickets then it may get their priority raised. Meanwhile, I am working on my own code fixes / ZenPack workaround and almost have something ready for alpha testing if you are interested.
Cheers,
Jane