T-SQL 将集合分组到单个列中,没有 NULL 重复项
一个同义词库数据库,其中术语和类别相互链接并运行 SQL Server 2008。 基于此和这个答案。这是一个示例:
CREATE TABLE #term (termid VARCHAR(8), en VARCHAR(32), enscope VARCHAR(32))
CREATE TABLE #link (linkid VARCHAR(10), termid VARCHAR(8), reltype VARCHAR(2), refid VARCHAR(8))
CREATE TABLE #categorylink (code VARCHAR(3), termid VARCHAR(8))
INSERT INTO #term VALUES ('100', 'ABC', 'abc_scopenote')
INSERT INTO #term VALUES ('120', 'DEF', 'def_scopenote')
INSERT INTO #term VALUES ('150', 'GHI', NULL)
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('1', '100', 'NT', '120')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('2', '100', 'NT', '150')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('3', '120', 'BT', '100')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('4', '120', 'RT', '150')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('5', '150', 'BT', '100')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('6', '150', 'RT', '120')
INSERT INTO #categorylink VALUES ('S01', '100')
INSERT INTO #categorylink VALUES ('S02', '100')
INSERT INTO #categorylink VALUES ('B04', '150')
SELECT
CASE
WHEN #term.enscope IS NULL AND refterm.en IS NULL AND #categorylink.code IS NULL
THEN #term.en
ELSE NULL
END,
CHAR(9) + 'SN ' + #term.enscope,
CHAR(9) + #link.reltype + CHAR(32) + refterm.en,
CHAR(9) + 'CODE ' + #categorylink.code
FROM #link
INNER JOIN #term ON #term.termid = #link.termid
INNER JOIN #term AS refterm ON refterm.termid = #link.refid
LEFT JOIN #categorylink ON #term.termid = #categorylink.termid
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS (#term.en, (#term.en, #term.enscope), (#term.en, #link.linkid, #link.reltype, refterm.en), (#term.en, #categorylink.code))
ORDER BY #term.en, #categorylink.code, #link.linkid, #term.enscope
GO
DROP TABLE #term
DROP TABLE #link
DROP TABLE #categorylink
GO
如果“enscope”中存在 NULL,则我会得到一个重复的行。
如果没有“categorylink”值,我就会得到重复的行。
请问如何避免这种情况?
我想将它们全部合并到一个列中,而不重复。
; WITH CTEterm AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY #term.en, refterm.en ORDER BY #term.en) AS rownumber,
#term.en AS mainterm,
CHAR(9) + 'SN ' + #term.enscope AS scopenote,
CHAR(9) + #link.reltype + CHAR(32) + refterm.en AS subterms,
CHAR(9) + 'CODE ' + #categorylink.code AS codes
FROM #link
INNER JOIN #term ON #term.termid = #link.termid
INNER JOIN #term AS refterm ON refterm.termid = #link.refid
LEFT JOIN #categorylink ON #term.termid = #categorylink.termid
)
SELECT COALESCE(
CASE
WHEN rownumber = 1
THEN mainterm
ELSE NULL
END,
scopenote,
subterms,
codes
)
FROM CTEterm
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ((mainterm, rownumber), (mainterm, scopenote), (mainterm, subterms), (mainterm, codes))
ORDER BY mainterm, codes, subterms, scopenote
GO
基本上如何避免在 CASE 中使用“ELSE NULL”(如“else 跳过行”)?
这就是我使用 COALESCE 得到的
ABC
NULL
SN abc_scopenote
NT DEF
NT GHI
CODE S01
CODE S02
NULL
DEF
SN def_scopenote
BT ABC
RT GHI
NULL
GHI
BT ABC
RT DEF
CODE B04
这就是我需要的
ABC
SN abc_scopenote
NT DEF
NT GHI
CODE S01
CODE S02
DEF
SN def_scopenote
BT ABC
RT GHI
GHI
BT ABC
RT DEF
CODE B04
同样的问题 这里
A thesaurus database where terms and categories are linked to each other and running SQL Server 2008.
Based on this and this answers. Here is a sample:
CREATE TABLE #term (termid VARCHAR(8), en VARCHAR(32), enscope VARCHAR(32))
CREATE TABLE #link (linkid VARCHAR(10), termid VARCHAR(8), reltype VARCHAR(2), refid VARCHAR(8))
CREATE TABLE #categorylink (code VARCHAR(3), termid VARCHAR(8))
INSERT INTO #term VALUES ('100', 'ABC', 'abc_scopenote')
INSERT INTO #term VALUES ('120', 'DEF', 'def_scopenote')
INSERT INTO #term VALUES ('150', 'GHI', NULL)
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('1', '100', 'NT', '120')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('2', '100', 'NT', '150')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('3', '120', 'BT', '100')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('4', '120', 'RT', '150')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('5', '150', 'BT', '100')
INSERT INTO #link VALUES ('6', '150', 'RT', '120')
INSERT INTO #categorylink VALUES ('S01', '100')
INSERT INTO #categorylink VALUES ('S02', '100')
INSERT INTO #categorylink VALUES ('B04', '150')
SELECT
CASE
WHEN #term.enscope IS NULL AND refterm.en IS NULL AND #categorylink.code IS NULL
THEN #term.en
ELSE NULL
END,
CHAR(9) + 'SN ' + #term.enscope,
CHAR(9) + #link.reltype + CHAR(32) + refterm.en,
CHAR(9) + 'CODE ' + #categorylink.code
FROM #link
INNER JOIN #term ON #term.termid = #link.termid
INNER JOIN #term AS refterm ON refterm.termid = #link.refid
LEFT JOIN #categorylink ON #term.termid = #categorylink.termid
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS (#term.en, (#term.en, #term.enscope), (#term.en, #link.linkid, #link.reltype, refterm.en), (#term.en, #categorylink.code))
ORDER BY #term.en, #categorylink.code, #link.linkid, #term.enscope
GO
DROP TABLE #term
DROP TABLE #link
DROP TABLE #categorylink
GO
If there is NULL in 'enscope' I've got a duplicate row.
If there is no 'categorylink' value I've got a duplicate row.
How to avoid this, please?
I want to COALESCE them all into a single column without duplicates.
; WITH CTEterm AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY #term.en, refterm.en ORDER BY #term.en) AS rownumber,
#term.en AS mainterm,
CHAR(9) + 'SN ' + #term.enscope AS scopenote,
CHAR(9) + #link.reltype + CHAR(32) + refterm.en AS subterms,
CHAR(9) + 'CODE ' + #categorylink.code AS codes
FROM #link
INNER JOIN #term ON #term.termid = #link.termid
INNER JOIN #term AS refterm ON refterm.termid = #link.refid
LEFT JOIN #categorylink ON #term.termid = #categorylink.termid
)
SELECT COALESCE(
CASE
WHEN rownumber = 1
THEN mainterm
ELSE NULL
END,
scopenote,
subterms,
codes
)
FROM CTEterm
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS ((mainterm, rownumber), (mainterm, scopenote), (mainterm, subterms), (mainterm, codes))
ORDER BY mainterm, codes, subterms, scopenote
GO
Basically how to avoid using 'ELSE NULL' in CASE (like 'else skip row')?
This is what I get using COALESCE
ABC
NULL
SN abc_scopenote
NT DEF
NT GHI
CODE S01
CODE S02
NULL
DEF
SN def_scopenote
BT ABC
RT GHI
NULL
GHI
BT ABC
RT DEF
CODE B04
This is what I need
ABC
SN abc_scopenote
NT DEF
NT GHI
CODE S01
CODE S02
DEF
SN def_scopenote
BT ABC
RT GHI
GHI
BT ABC
RT DEF
CODE B04
Same question here
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5906/d59060df4059a6cc364216c4d63ceec29ef7fe66" alt="扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群"
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
抱歉,如果结果不是您所期望的,但如果您只是需要摆脱 NULL,那么我不明白为什么您不能这样做:
注意:
ELSE NULL
已在此处删除只是因为它没有改变任何东西(当没有ELSE
时隐含NULL
),而不是因为删除它你会得到任何东西。Sorry if this turns out not really what you expected, but if you simply need to get rid of NULLs then I fail to see why you can't just do like this:
Note:
ELSE NULL
is removed here only because it changes nothing (NULL
is implied when there's noELSE
), not because you would gain anything from removing it.