在消息中使用变量 - Lingo

发布于 2024-11-15 00:48:55 字数 562 浏览 2 评论 0原文

谁能告诉我是否有办法在一段代码中使用变量，以便可以循环代码向多个对象发送消息？

例如，如果我有 10 个按钮，并希望每个按钮发送同一命令“sendCommandX”的变体，其中 X 是按钮的编号。

现在我有 10 条单独的消息，每个按钮都调用自己的消息，就像

on mouseUp
   sendCommand1
end

on mouseUp
   sendCommand2
end

这 10 条 sendCommand# 消息中的每一个都执行相同的操作，只是其中的数字不同。

如果我可以在调用中使用变量，那就太好了，这样我就可以得到一条可重用的消息。就像：

on mouseUp
   sendCommandX (X being the number of the button clicked)
end

然后 sendCommandX 可以在其中使用相同的变量，就像

on sendCommandX
   echo "you clicked button X:
end

原文

Can anyone tell me if there is a way for me to use a variable within a lump of code, so that code can be looped to send messages to multiple objects?

For example, if I have 10 buttons and want each to send a variation of the same command 'sendCommandX', with X being the number of the button.

Right now I have 10 separate messages, and each button calls its own, like

on mouseUp
   sendCommand1
end

on mouseUp
   sendCommand2
end

Each of these 10 sendCommand# messages do the same thing, just with a different number in them.

It would be great if I could use a variable within the call, so I could have one reusable message. Like:

on mouseUp
   sendCommandX (X being the number of the button clicked)
end

and then the sendCommandX could use the same variable within, like

on sendCommandX
   echo "you clicked button X:
end

分享到QQ

分享到微博

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

需要登录才能够评论，你可以免费注册一个本站的账号。

罪歌 2024-11-22 00:48:55

发送数字作为参数：

-- on Button 1
on mouseUp
  sendCommand 1
end

-- on Button 2
on mouseUp
  sendCommand 2
end

-- movie script!
on sendCommand which
  -- use 'which' here, e.g.
  put "You pressed button " & which
end

我猜你的按钮脚本是演员脚本？

该代码作为一种行为会更好，因为这样您只需要一个脚本。但像这样就可以正常工作了。

send the number as a parameter:

-- on Button 1
on mouseUp
  sendCommand 1
end

-- on Button 2
on mouseUp
  sendCommand 2
end

-- movie script!
on sendCommand which
  -- use 'which' here, e.g.
  put "You pressed button " & which
end

I guess your button scripts are cast member scripts?

This code would be better as a behavior, because then you'd only need one script. But it will work ok like this.

回复收藏 0 原文

~没有更多了~