We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for software libraries, tutorials, tools, books, or other off-site resources. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed last year.
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
接受
或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
发布评论
评论(2)
也许mjpeg?它不需要任何特殊的硬件或加速,并且 JPEG 非常容易实现。
Maybe mjpeg? It doesn't require any special hardware or acceleration, and JPEG is pretty easy to implement.
Cinepak 解码器非常简单,甚至与 mjpeg 相比。遗憾的是,没有开源编码器,但可以通过 mencoder 在 Windows 和 Linux 上使用二进制编码器 dll。
http://multimedia.cx/mirror/cinepak.txt
对于可能更简单的格式,请参阅
< a href="http://multimedia.cx/eggs/worlds-simplest-vector-quantizer/" rel="nofollow">http://multimedia.cx/eggs/worlds-simplest-vector-quantizer/
Cinepak decoder is very simple, compared even to mjpeg. There are unfortunately no open source encoders but a binary encoder dll is available and usable both on Windows and on Linux via mencoder.
http://multimedia.cx/mirror/cinepak.txt
For possibly an even simpler format see
http://multimedia.cx/eggs/worlds-simplest-vector-quantizer/