这个日期时间函数可以写得更有效吗?
以下函数返回两个日期时间值之间的差异(以字符串形式)。可以写得更高效/优雅吗?
/**
* @hint Returns the difference between two time strings in words.
*/
public string function timeAgoInWords(required date fromTime, date toTime=now())
{
local.secondDiff = dateDiff("s", arguments.fromTime, arguments.toTime);
if (local.secondDiff <= 60)
return "#local.secondDiff# seconds ago";
local.minuteDiff = dateDiff("n", arguments.fromTime, arguments.toTime);
if (local.minuteDiff <= 60)
if (local.minuteDiff < 2)
return "1 minute ago";
else return "#local.minuteDiff# minutes ago";
if (local.minuteDiff <= 1440)
if (local.minuteDiff <= 120)
return "1 hour ago";
else return "#int(local.minuteDiff/60)# hours ago";
if (local.minuteDiff <= 2880)
return "yesterday";
if (local.minuteDiff <= 4320)
return "2 days ago";
local.monthDiff = dateDiff("m", arguments.fromTime, arguments.toTime);
if (local.monthDiff <= 12)
return "#dateFormat(arguments.fromTime, "mmm dd")# at #timeFormat(arguments.fromTime, "h:mm")#";
return "#dateFormat(arguments.fromTime, "mmm dd 'yy")# at #timeFormat(arguments.fromTime, "h:mm")#";
}
The following function returns the difference between two date time values in words (as a string). Can it be written more efficiently/elegantly?
/**
* @hint Returns the difference between two time strings in words.
*/
public string function timeAgoInWords(required date fromTime, date toTime=now())
{
local.secondDiff = dateDiff("s", arguments.fromTime, arguments.toTime);
if (local.secondDiff <= 60)
return "#local.secondDiff# seconds ago";
local.minuteDiff = dateDiff("n", arguments.fromTime, arguments.toTime);
if (local.minuteDiff <= 60)
if (local.minuteDiff < 2)
return "1 minute ago";
else return "#local.minuteDiff# minutes ago";
if (local.minuteDiff <= 1440)
if (local.minuteDiff <= 120)
return "1 hour ago";
else return "#int(local.minuteDiff/60)# hours ago";
if (local.minuteDiff <= 2880)
return "yesterday";
if (local.minuteDiff <= 4320)
return "2 days ago";
local.monthDiff = dateDiff("m", arguments.fromTime, arguments.toTime);
if (local.monthDiff <= 12)
return "#dateFormat(arguments.fromTime, "mmm dd")# at #timeFormat(arguments.fromTime, "h:mm")#";
return "#dateFormat(arguments.fromTime, "mmm dd 'yy")# at #timeFormat(arguments.fromTime, "h:mm")#";
}
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
这是我几个月前写的,基于上面评论中发布的 UDF Al Everett,并以 CF9 脚本风格编写。效率不会更高。事实上,它应该比您的实现慢,因为它多次调用
dateDiff()
,并且需要预先设置 2 个数组,但总体行数更短且易于理解。This is what I wrote a few months ago, based on the UDF Al Everett posted above in the comment and written in CF9 script style. It won't be more efficient. In fact, it should be slower then your implementation 'cause it has multiple calls to
dateDiff()
, and needs to set up 2 arrays up front, but the overall line count is shorter and easily understandable.我觉得不错。您可以使用第一个 diff (local.secondDiff) 进行所有测试,而不是重新比较,但这可能更容易阅读。
It looks good to me. You could instead use your first diff (local.secondDiff) for all your tests rather than re-diffing, but this is probably easier to read.