It won't do you much good -- DIAMETER is the wrapper protocol. Unlike RADIUS, where the entire packet is defined, leaving you with only the problem of decoding vendor specific attributes, DIAMETER dances around the actual AVPs themselves. There is no "standard" the defines what those AVPs are, how they are encoded, if the DIAMETER messages are to be encrypted etc.
To pursue this, you'll need your DIAMETER endpoints and router message dictionaries.
发布评论
评论（3）
这是一个示例捕获
Here is one sample capture
我建议您查看有关直径的wireshark wiki，那里有一个示例： https://wiki.wireshark .org/直径
I recommend you to take a look at the wireshark wiki regarding diameter, there a sample right there: https://wiki.wireshark.org/DIAMETER
它不会给你带来太多好处——DIAMETER 是包装协议。与定义了整个数据包的 RADIUS 不同，DIAMETER 围绕实际的 AVP 本身跳舞，只留下解码供应商特定属性的问题。没有“标准”定义这些 AVP 是什么、它们如何编码、DIAMETER 消息是否要加密等。
为了实现这一点，您需要 DIAMETER 端点和路由器消息字典。
It won't do you much good -- DIAMETER is the wrapper protocol. Unlike RADIUS, where the entire packet is defined, leaving you with only the problem of decoding vendor specific attributes, DIAMETER dances around the actual AVPs themselves. There is no "standard" the defines what those AVPs are, how they are encoded, if the DIAMETER messages are to be encrypted etc.
To pursue this, you'll need your DIAMETER endpoints and router message dictionaries.