在 Scala 中创建 GUI，但不使用 Swing/AWT
我将编写一个具有 GUI 的新应用程序。当我最近读到一本关于 Scala 的书（并且变得非常哽咽）时，我决定先学习该语言，然后尝试构建该程序。
我想知道的是：有没有什么好的方法可以在 Scala 中构建 GUI，而不必被迫使用 Swing/AWT 工具包？我不喜欢 Swing/AWT，因为与 Qt 和 AWT 相比，它们显得不成熟。不幸的是，我无法找到很多关于在 Scala 中构建 GUI 的信息，而不依赖于这些信息。
由于我对 Scala 还很陌生，对它了解不多，所以我也想知道是否可以在 Scala 中使用特定工具包的 Java 绑定，而不会牺牲 Scala 的任何令人愉悦的功能。特征（例如模式匹配）。
还需要注意的是：该工具包应支持 Linux 和 Windows，并且外观应与每个平台上的本机外观相同。
更新：这是我当前的工具包排名（请随意对此发表评论）：
1.SWT
+ 原生 L&F
+ 真正的 Java 解决方案
。还不确定性能
。还不确定学习和编码是否容易
- 需要释放资源来释放资源
2.Qt占碑
+ 部分原生 L&F
+ 许多可能性
+ 非常容易学习
。还不确定性能
- C++ 工具包的包装 =>代码会变得丑陋吗？
3.Java Gnome
。还不确定任何事情 - 有人尝试过吗？
似乎不存在积极开发的 Java 包装器的工具包：
- WxWidgets
被丢弃的工具包：
- Swing/AWT：旧，我不喜欢编码
- JavaFX：针对丰富的互联网应用程序 - 我想要一个独立的应用程序
从头开始为 Scala 程序员编写的新工具包会很好，但我想这不会发生，因为可能会重用基于 Java 的解决方案。
I'm going to write a new application which shall have a GUI. As I recently crossed a book about Scala (and became really choked-up) I decided to learn that language first and then try to build the program.
What I was wondering: Is there any decent way to build a GUI in Scala without being forced to make use of the Swing/AWT toolkits? I don't like Swing/AWT as they seem immature in comparison to Qt & Co. Unfortunately I could not find much information about building a GUI in Scala without depending on those.
As I am quite new to Scala and don't know too much about it, yet, I'm also wondering if the Java-binding of a specific toolkit could be used in Scala in a way that didn't sacrifice any of Scala's pleasant features (e.g. pattern matching).
One further note: The toolkit should support Linux and Windows and the Look-and-Feel should equal the native one on each platform.
UPDATE: This is my current ranking of toolkits (feel free to comment on this):
1. SWT
+ native L&F
+ a real Java solution
. not sure about performance, yet
. not sure about the easy of learning and coding, yet
- dealloc needed to free resources
2. Qt Jambi
+ partially native L&F
+ many possibilies
+ quite easy to learn
. not sure about performance, yet
- a wrapper around a C++ toolkit => might the code become ugly?
3. Java Gnome
. not sure about anything, yet - has anybody tried it?
Toolkits for which no actively developed Java wrapper seems to exist:
- WxWidgets
Toolkits which are discarded:
- Swing/AWT: Old and I don't like the coding
- JavaFX: Rich Internet Application targeted - I want a standalone application
A new toolkit written for Scala programmers from scratch would be nice but I guess this won't happen due to the possibility of reusing Java based solutions.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
Scala 应该能够做任何你在 java 中能做的事情，所以是的，如果你有一个 gui 库的 java 绑定，它应该可以正常工作。
您是否考虑过 SWT 作为 AWT/Swing 的替代方案？它尽可能使用本机小部件。 Eclipse 是用SWT 编写的。
Scala should be able to do anything you can do in java, so yes if you have a java binding for a gui library, it should work fine.
Have you looked at SWT, as an alternative to AWT/Swing? It uses native widgets whenever possible. Eclipse is written with SWT.
JavaFX 怎么样？ JavaFX 2.0预计很快就会发布。您确实可以将 JavaFX 写入 Scala :)
What about JavaFX ? JavaFX 2.0 expected to release soon. You do can write JavaFX into Scala :)
QT-Jambi 是可行的方法，它不能开箱即用，
有说明吗？此链接将对您有用：
http://www.davidlauzon.net/ 2010/01/getting-started-with-qt-jambi-on-linux/
http://qt -jambi.org/downloads
我建议使用4.6.3，因为已经完成，测试版缺少文件
__
我不知道你是否正在寻找特定的 Java 解决方案，但 Python 是一个很好的选择，你可以选择 QT（再次）、wxWidgets 等等...
Python QT Specific 有 2 个绑定，一个是 PyQT 和 PySide，最后一个的优点是 LGPL 许可证，您可以将其货币化。
示例代码在这里和这里：
http://qt-project.org/wiki/PySide_Example_Applications
https://github.com/PySide/Examples
QT-Jambi is the way to go, it doesn't work out of the box,
Instructions? This link will be useful for you:
http://www.davidlauzon.net/2010/01/getting-started-with-qt-jambi-on-linux/
http://qt-jambi.org/downloads
I suggest to use the 4.6.3 because is complete, the betas has missing files
__
And i dont know if you are looking specific Java solution, but Python is a good alternative, and you can choose QT (again), wxWidgets, and more...
Python QT Specific there are 2 bindings, one is PyQT, and PySide, the advantage of last one is LGPL license and you can monetize it.
Sample code here and here:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/PySide_Example_Applications
https://github.com/PySide/Examples