Java wait() 不抛出 InterruptedException

发布于 2024-11-08 05:17:43 字数 952 浏览 7 评论 0原文

我在线程 A 上有一个对象正在调用wait(),而线程 B 上的另一个对象执行一些工作,然后调用线程 A 对象的 notify()。然后线程 A 执行一些后处理。

我的问题非常简单:

synchronized(this)
{
    while(!flag)
    {
        try
        {
            wait();
            getLogger().info("No longer waiting");
        }
        catch (InterruptedException ie)
        {
            getLogger().info("Wait threw InterruptedException");
        }
    }
}

导致信息消息“不再等待”而不是“等待抛出 InterruptedException”。

我很困惑,因为这个 (http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Object.html#wait()):

抛出:

InterruptedException - 如果另一个线程中断了 当前线程在等待之前或期间 通知。当前线程的中断状态被清除 当抛出此异常时。

为什么我会有奇怪的行为?

谢谢。

I have an object on thread A that is calling wait() while another object on thread B does some work then calls thread A's object's notify(). Thread A then performs some post-processing.

My problem is pretty straightforward:

synchronized(this)
{
    while(!flag)
    {
        try
        {
            wait();
            getLogger().info("No longer waiting");
        }
        catch (InterruptedException ie)
        {
            getLogger().info("Wait threw InterruptedException");
        }
    }
}

Results in an info message of "No longer waiting" instead of "Wait threw InterruptedException".

I am confused, because of this (http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Object.html#wait()):

Throws:

InterruptedException - if another thread interrupted the
current thread before or while the current thread was waiting for a
notification. The interrupted status of the current thread is cleared
when this exception is thrown.

Why am I getting odd behavior?

Thanks.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(4

半世蒼涼 2024-11-15 05:17:44

当线程使用wait()等待时,他实际上是在等待notify()。因此,一旦另一个线程调用了notify(),该线程将继续,如果您调用interrupt(),您将得到异常。

另外,从您链接到的文档中:

导致当前线程等待
另一个线程调用notify()
方法或notifyAll()方法
这个对象

notify释放线程的锁。

InterruptedException - 如果另一个
线程中断了当前线程
在当前线程之前或同时
等待通知。

 

When a thread waits using wait(), he actually waits for notify(). So once notify() has been called by the other thread, this thread will continue, if you will call interrupt(), you would get the exception.

Also, from the documents you linked to:

Causes current thread to wait until
another thread invokes the notify()
method or the notifyAll() method for
this object

notify releases the thread from the lock.

InterruptedException - if another
thread interrupted the current thread
before or while the current thread was
waiting for a notification.

 

财迷小姐 2024-11-15 05:17:44

notify() 不会使 wait() 抛出 InterruptedExceptionnotify()wait() 继续正常的程序流程。

notify() does not make wait() throw InterruptedException. notify() let wait() continue the normal program flow.

凉城 2024-11-15 05:17:44

notify() 并不是 wait() 线程的异常终止。例如,如果线程在调用 notify() 之前终止,而不是由于调用 notify() 的结果,您就会收到异常。线程并没有被中断——它已经被唤醒了。

notify() is not an abnormal termintation for a thread that is wait()-ing. You'd get the exception if, for instance, the thread was terminated before notify() was called - not as a result of notify() being called. The thread hasn't been interrupted - it's been awoken.

那请放手 2024-11-15 05:17:44

请注意,该代码中有一个错误。等待应该始终在循环中调用,并在唤醒后检查条件。

wait 可以通过虚假唤醒来唤醒。请参阅 javadoc wait()< /a>

Note that you have a bug in that code. Wait should always be invoked in a loop, and check a condition after waking up.

wait can be awaken by a spurious wakeup. See the javadoc wait()

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文