作为代码编辑器，TextMate 真的物有所值吗？
我读过很多人的帖子，对 TextMate 作为代码编辑器赞不绝口，并且想知道它是否真的值得高昂的价格，特别是因为有很多免费的替代品。
它真的比 DashCode、TextWrangler 甚至 Vim/Emacs 更好吗？
它有哪些独特之处？
I've been reading posts from a lot of people, raving about TextMate as a code editor and was wondering if it's really worth the hefty price tag specially since there's plenty of free alternatives.
Is it really better than DashCode, TextWrangler or maybe even Vim/Emacs?
Which are the features that set it appart?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
当我在 2006 年尝试 TextMate 时，它感觉“神奇”。它的制表符完成/片段系统、矩形选择/编辑、可扩展性、良好的 SVN 集成和整体风格使其比 TextWrangler、DreamWeaver 或我在时间。我对此感到非常兴奋，并在我周围传播了它的力量。
我在完成一个试用版项目后就购买了它。对当时的我来说，每一分钱都是值得的。
不过，我花了大约一年的大量使用才达到稳定水平。我非常了解 TextMate，但在某种程度上开始感觉它“有限”。
事实上，TextMate 的影响力非常大：现在许多 IDE/编辑器都有许多受 TextMate 启发的功能。与此同时，TextMate 的开发陷入停滞，去年我开始深入研究 Vim。
学习曲线比 TextMate 陡峭得多，感觉更“hackish”，但它更强大。
而且它是免费的。
TextMate 比 DashCode 更适合编辑（也更通用）。
我上面列出的功能及其完善使其比 TextWrangler 方便得多。
但它的功能比 Vim/Emacs 弱很多。
TextMate felt "magical" when I tried it in 2006. Its tab-completion/snippets system, rectangular selection/editing, extensibility, nice SVN integration and overall style made it a lot better for coding than TextWrangler, DreamWeaver or anything I tried at the time. I was very excited about it and evangelized its power around me.
I bought it just after I completed a project with the trial version. It was worth every penny for me at the time.
It took me about a year of heavy usage to reach a plateau, though. I knew TextMate very well but it started to feel "limited" in a way.
Actually, TextMate has been very influential: many IDEs/editors now have many features inspired by TextMate. In the mean time TextMate's development has stalled and last year, I started to dig into Vim.
The learning curve was/is a lot steeper than with TextMate and it feels a lot more "hackish" but it's so much more powerful.
And it's free.
TextMate is a lot better (and more versatile) for editing than DashCode.
The features I listed above and its polish make it a lot more convenient than TextWrangler.
But it's a lot less powerful than Vim/Emacs.
另请检查新版本的 Textmate (Textmate2)。它仍然处于 Alpha 版本，但添加了很多新的很酷的功能功能如下：
以及其他改进，例如异步运行进程的能力，分割窗口和自动完成。
Also check the new release of Textmate, (Textmate2). It is still on Alpha, but has added a lot of new cool features like:
amongst other improvements like ability to run processes async, split windows and autocompletion.
我没有看到 TextMate 具有的任何功能，而其他程序（例如 TextWrangler、Komodo Edit、gvim 等）则没有。就我个人而言，我在 OSX 上使用 TextWrangler，发现它可以很好地满足我所有的文本编辑需求。
I don't see any features that TextMate has, which other programs such as TextWrangler, Komodo Edit, gvim, etc don't. Personally, I use TextWrangler on OSX, and find it to work well with all my text-editing needs.
TextMate 很棒，但仅限 Mac 的方法对我来说有点烦人，因为我也使用过 Windows 和 Linux。所以现在我改用 Sublime Text 2 ，尽管它仍处于测试阶段，但它很稳定并且工作得很好就像文本伴侣一样。
价格标签是相同的（59 美元），并且您将获得一个适用于所有主要系统的编辑器。
TextMate is awesome, but the Mac only approach was a bit annoying for me since I have using Windows and Linux aswell. So now I am using Sublime Text 2 instead, even though it's still in beta, it's stable and works pretty much like TextMate.
And the price tag is the same ($59), and you get a editor that works in all major systems.
对我来说，TextMate 物有所值。我正在寻找一个简单的解决方案，以便在 MediaWiki 中编码时找到匹配的括号/大括号。由于 TextMate 有一个 MediaWiki 包，它似乎可以找到匹配的对和不匹配的对（大多数）。这对我有很大的帮助。顺便说一句，我已经使用 TextWrangler（及其前身 BBEdit Lite）很多年了。这些应用程序可以对 HTML 进行颜色编码，但不能为 MediaWiki 执行此操作。最美好的祝愿/每
For me, TextMate will be worth the price. I'm looking for a simple solution to find matching brackets/braces when coding in MediaWiki. As TextMate has a MediaWiki bundle, it seems to find the matching pairs and those who don't match up (most of them). It has been of great help to me. BTW, I've been using TextWrangler (and its predecessor BBEdit Lite) for quite some years. Those apps can colour code HTML, but they cannot do it for MediaWiki. Best of wishes/Per