使用 proguard 与 java.lang.reflect.Proxy 进行混淆
出于调试原因,我使用 java.lang.reflect.Proxy 东西来实现所有可能的接口的通用方法......但这似乎很难让它与 proguard 一起工作。有什么建议吗?
谢谢 -马可
public class DebugLogListenerFactory {
public static IAirplaneListenerAll createStreamHandle(ICAirplane plane) {
DebugLogListenerHandler handler = new DebugLogListenerHandler(plane);
IAirplaneListenerAll proxy = (IAirplaneListenerAll) Proxy
.newProxyInstance(IAirplaneListenerAll.class.getClassLoader(),
new Class[] { IAirplaneListenerAll.class }, handler);
plane.addListener(proxy);
return proxy;
}
private static class DebugLogListenerHandler implements InvocationHandler {
private final Level levDef = Level.FINE;
public DebugLogListenerHandler() {
}
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args)
throws Throwable {
System.out.println("invoked" + method);
String methodName = method.getName();
String msg = methodName + ": ";
if (args != null) {
boolean first = true;
for (Object o : args) {
if (first) {
first = false;
} else {
msg += " ,";
}
msg += o.toString();
}
}
CDebug.getLog().log(levDef, msg);
return null;
}
}
}
I use for debugging reasons the java.lang.reflect.Proxy stuff to have a generic way to implement all possible interfaces... but this seems to be difficult to get it working with proguard. Any suggestions?
THX
-Marco
public class DebugLogListenerFactory {
public static IAirplaneListenerAll createStreamHandle(ICAirplane plane) {
DebugLogListenerHandler handler = new DebugLogListenerHandler(plane);
IAirplaneListenerAll proxy = (IAirplaneListenerAll) Proxy
.newProxyInstance(IAirplaneListenerAll.class.getClassLoader(),
new Class[] { IAirplaneListenerAll.class }, handler);
plane.addListener(proxy);
return proxy;
}
private static class DebugLogListenerHandler implements InvocationHandler {
private final Level levDef = Level.FINE;
public DebugLogListenerHandler() {
}
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args)
throws Throwable {
System.out.println("invoked" + method);
String methodName = method.getName();
String msg = methodName + ": ";
if (args != null) {
boolean first = true;
for (Object o : args) {
if (first) {
first = false;
} else {
msg += " ,";
}
msg += o.toString();
}
}
CDebug.getLog().log(levDef, msg);
return null;
}
}
}
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
最简单的解决方案可能是避免缩小/优化/混淆接口及其方法:
您可能允许缩小:
如果 InspirationHandler 可以处理混淆的方法名称,您也可能允许混淆:
The easiest solution is probably to avoid shrinking/optimizing/obfuscating the interface and its methods:
You might allow shrinking:
If the InvocationHandler can deal with obfuscated method names, you might also allow obfuscation: