Matlab - 匿名函数中的for循环
我对 matlab 很陌生，但我知道如何执行 for 循环和匿名函数。现在我想把这些结合起来。
我想写：
sa = @(c) for i = 1:numel(biscs{c}),figure(i),imshow(biscs{c}{i}.Image),end;
但这是无效的，因为 matlab 似乎只希望换行符作为命令分隔符。我以清晰的方式编写的代码是（没有函数头）：
for i = 1:numel(biscs{c})
figure(i)
imshow(biscs{c}{i}.Image)
end
我寻找一种解决方案，可以像我的第一个示例一样在一行中使用匿名函数编写它。如果我能以另一种方式创建该函数，只要我不需要新的函数 m 文件，我也会很高兴。
I'm quite new to matlab, but I know how to do both for loops and anonymous functions. Now I would like to combine these.
I want to write:
sa = @(c) for i = 1:numel(biscs{c}), figure(i), imshow(biscs{c}{i}.Image), end;
But that isn't valid, since matlab seem to want newlines as only command-seperator. My code written in a clear way would be (without function header):
for i = 1:numel(biscs{c})
figure(i)
imshow(biscs{c}{i}.Image)
end
I look for a solution where either I can write it with an anonymous function in a single line like my first example. I would also be happy if I could create that function another way, as long as I don't need a new function m-file for i.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
匿名函数可以包含多个语句，但不能包含显式循环或 if 子句。多个语句在元胞数组中传递，并依次进行计算。例如，此函数将打开一个图形并绘制一些数据：
但是，这并不能解决循环问题。幸运的是，有ARRAYFUN。这样，您就可以如下编写循环：
方便的是，该函数还返回
figure和imshow的输出，即各自的句柄。Anonymous functions can contain multiple statements, but no explicit loops or if-clauses. The multiple statements are passed in a cell array, and are evaluated one after another. For example this function will open a figure and plot some data:
This doesn't solve the problem of the loop, however. Fortunately, there is ARRAYFUN. With this, you can write your loop as follows:
Conveniently, this function also returns the outputs of
figureandimshow, i.e. the respective handles.如果您从另一个函数调用此函数，则可以在主函数的 .m 文件末尾定义它，然后使用 @name 语法引用它。但这不适用于脚本文件，因为它们不能包含子函数。
第二种方法有点脏，但仍然可行，并且是使用 eval STRING：
如果脚本文件能够以某种方式允许子函数的定义，那就太好了，但这不太可能。
If you're calling this function from another function, you can define it at the end of the main function's .m file, then refer to it using the @name syntax. This doesn't work from script files, though, as these cannot contain sub functions.
A second approach is somewhat dirty, but nevertheless might work, and is to use eval STRING:
It would be great if script files could allow the definition of sub functions somehow, but this is unlikely.