This is a tough call, but honestly, WebM is probably going to win out in the end considering it's Google's project. Ogg will most likely stay what it is now in its audio counterpart-- an open standard that is not widely-adopted even though it's superior in some ways.
H.264 is Apple's, WebM is Google's. Apple will most likely end up adopting WebM, and Google will most likely continue to pare back H.264 on their devices.
I'd base your decision more on longevity than on video quality, the reason being that the quality isn't that different, and even better quality could end up losing in the end. Remember Betamax?
We are using an optimized version of Theora for our video-chat appliation, and are very happy with the quality and performance. VP8 seems to have the same quality, but the encoder is slow compared to Theora.
发布评论
评论（2）
来自 这篇 2011 年文章：
，但说实话，考虑到它是 Google 的项目，WebM 可能最终会胜出。 Ogg 很可能会保持其音频对应物的现状——一种开放标准，尽管它在某些方面更为优越，但并未得到广泛采用。
H.264 是Apple 的，WebM 是Google 的。苹果很可能最终会采用 WebM，而谷歌很可能会继续削减其设备上的 H.264。
我会让你的决定更多地基于寿命而不是视频质量，原因是质量没有那么不同，甚至更好的质量最终也可能会失败。还记得 Betamax 吗？
Good graph from this 2011 article:
This is a tough call, but honestly, WebM is probably going to win out in the end considering it's Google's project. Ogg will most likely stay what it is now in its audio counterpart-- an open standard that is not widely-adopted even though it's superior in some ways.
H.264 is Apple's, WebM is Google's. Apple will most likely end up adopting WebM, and Google will most likely continue to pare back H.264 on their devices.
I'd base your decision more on longevity than on video quality, the reason being that the quality isn't that different, and even better quality could end up losing in the end. Remember Betamax?
我们正在为我们的视频聊天应用程序使用 Theora 的优化版本，并且对其质量和性能非常满意。 VP8 似乎具有相同的质量，但编码器比 Theora 慢。
We are using an optimized version of Theora for our video-chat appliation, and are very happy with the quality and performance. VP8 seems to have the same quality, but the encoder is slow compared to Theora.