At work we use Rails, for my private projects I tend to use Sinatra and am very happy with its minimalism. I am however planning to do something with Padrino soon, since it seems to be positioned in a nice niche between Sinatra and Rails.
I'm currently using Nanoc, and I'd definitely recommend starting with a static site generator. This almost completely cuts out many types of issue. It also enables you to store your content as text files on a filesystem, rather than dealing with a database and special editor interfaces.
If you need server-side programming then move up to something that uses Git as the storage, again really to avoid locking your content into a database.
It's well worth looking at Compass to help you with the CSS - Compass will work with whatever you choose. Compass does require you to spend a little time learning it, but can makes CSS much easier in the longer-term. For example, it has helpers that let you set up CSS3 effects.
发布评论
评论（4）
您并没有真正指定您的网站在静态/动态内容等方面的具体情况，因此真正能做的就是列出一些选项：
在工作中我们使用 Rails，对于我的私人项目，我倾向于使用 Sinatra，并且对其极简主义感到非常满意。不过，我计划很快与 Padrino 合作，因为它似乎处于 Sinatra 和 Rails 之间的一个不错的位置。
You didn't really specify how exactly your site is going to be in terms of static/dynamic content etc, so all one can really do is list some options:
At work we use Rails, for my private projects I tend to use Sinatra and am very happy with its minimalism. I am however planning to do something with Padrino soon, since it seems to be positioned in a nice niche between Sinatra and Rails.
我目前正在使用 Nanoc，我绝对建议从静态站点生成器开始。这几乎完全消除了许多类型的问题。它还使您能够将内容作为文本文件存储在文件系统上，而不是处理数据库和特殊的编辑器界面。
如果您需要服务器端编程，那么请升级到使用 Git 作为存储的东西，再次真正避免将您的内容锁定到数据库中。
Compass 非常值得一看，它可以帮助您使用 CSS - Compass 可以与您的任何内容一起使用选择。 Compass 确实需要您花一点时间来学习，但从长远来看可以使 CSS 变得更容易。例如，它具有帮助您设置 CSS3 效果的帮助程序。
I'm currently using Nanoc, and I'd definitely recommend starting with a static site generator. This almost completely cuts out many types of issue. It also enables you to store your content as text files on a filesystem, rather than dealing with a database and special editor interfaces.
If you need server-side programming then move up to something that uses Git as the storage, again really to avoid locking your content into a database.
It's well worth looking at Compass to help you with the CSS - Compass will work with whatever you choose. Compass does require you to spend a little time learning it, but can makes CSS much easier in the longer-term. For example, it has helpers that let you set up CSS3 effects.
Jekyll 似乎是现在很酷的孩子们使用的东西。它是一个生成器，而不是 CMS。
您可以在线找到许多具有各种设置的“开源”网站（请参阅此处< /a>)
Jekyll seems to be what the cool kids use these days. It's a generator, not a CMS.
You can find lots of "open source" sites online with various setups (see here)
我的解决方案
经过太多思考后，我最终使用了 Nesta CMS正如此 Peepcode 博客中所设想的那样
文章。
实际上，我使用自制的 scss 版本 http://semantic.gs 和 html5 样板布局。
Nesta 现在具有插件功能，并且有两个很棒的插件可用：
感谢大家分享您的想法。
My Solution
After too much thinking I ended up using Nesta CMS as envisioned in this Peepcode blog
article.
Actually I use a home made scss version of http://semantic.gs and the html5 boilerplate layout.
Nesta is now plugin capable and has two wonderful plugins available:
Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts.