.net 数据包捕获：pcap.net 与 Sharppcap
对任何人对可用于被动数据包捕获的各种 .net 工具的评论感兴趣。就 winpcap 而言，选择似乎是在 pcap.net 和 Sharppcap 之间。另一个潜在的产品是 Microsoft 的 NetworkMonitor，我相信还有其他产品。
多年来，我偶尔使用 ethereal/wireshark 作为诊断工具，但这是我知识的限制。我正在寻求自动化捕获过程和后续诊断处理。我目前倾向于使用 pcap.net，但想听听使用过两种或多种这些工具的人的意见，以及他们是否会推荐其中一种工具。我的偏好是最简单的界面/最浅的学习曲线。请让我知道您的想法。
谢谢 帕特里克
interested in any comments anyone has around the various .net tools which can be used for passive packet capture. In terms of winpcap the choice seems to be between pcap.net and sharppcap. Another potential offering is Microsoft's NetworkMonitor and I am sure there are others as well.
I have used ethereal/wireshark as a diagnostic tool occasionally over the years but that is the limit of my knowledge. I'm looking to automate the capture process and subsequent diagnostic processing. I am tending towards pcap.net at the moment but would like to hear from anyone who has used two or more of these tools and whether they'd recommend one over another. My preference would be for the simplest interface/shallowest learning curve. Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks
Patrick
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
如果您愿意使用 .NET 4 或愿意使用旧版本的 Pcap.Net，那么它绝对是您的选择。
Pcap.Net 更加灵活，包含更多功能，并且非常易于使用。
披露：我是 Pcap.Net 的开发人员。
If you're willing to use .NET 4 or willing to use older versions of Pcap.Net, it is definitely the choice.
Pcap.Net is much more flexible and include many more features and is very easy to use.
Disclosure: I'm a developer in Pcap.Net.
好吧，我最终使用了 Sharppcap，因为 pcap.net 所需的 dll 引用无法正确加载到我的项目中。预计这是我的错误，但 Sharppcap 参考工作没有大惊小怪......
Well, I've ended up using sharppcap because the dll references required for pcap.net wouldn't load into my project correctly. Expect it was my mistake but the sharppcap reference worked without fuss...