Microsoft SGEN 工具仅在评论中更改工具版本
我在用于从 SGEN 生成类的 SGEN 工具中遇到了一些奇怪的行为。
在该工具生成的类文件中，文件顶部有一条注释，表示该文件是使用版本 2.0.50727.xxxx 生成的。查看该文件之前的历史记录，每次有人重建该文件时，这个 xxxx 数字都会发生变化。尽管此注释更改了源中指定工具版本的属性，但实际使用的工具 (2.0.50727.42) 保持一致。该数字从未与评论中的数字匹配。
直到今天，建造者与该数字之间仍存在 1:1 的相关性。然而，今天，建筑商让它插入了一个与他过去收到的不同的数字。不过，他使用的是与以前相同的机器和设置。我无法确定为什么这个数字会改变以及什么会导致这种行为。
有其他人观察到 SGEN 的类似行为或知道是什么原因造成的吗？
生成该注释的代码是否存在错误，或者这里是否存在潜在问题？
I came across some strange behavior with the SGEN tool that is used to generate classes from SGEN's.
In the class files that are generated by the tool, there is a comment at the top of the file it says that the file was generated using version 2.0.50727.xxxx. Looking at the previous history of the file, this xxxx number changes every time someone different rebuilds the file. Although this comment changes the attributes in the source that specify the version of the tool, the actual tool used (2.0.50727.42) remain consistent. This number has never matched to the number in the comment.
Until today, there was a 1:1 correlation between the builder and that number. However, today, the builder had it insert a number different from what he received in the past. He is using the same machine though and setup as before. I can't determine why this number would change and what would be causing this behavior.
Has anyone else observed similar behavior with SGEN or know what is causing it?
Is it bug with the code that generates that comment or is there a potential for a problem here?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论