This is highly subjective, but here's my two cents worth after managing hundreds of projects.
Each project is so unique that you won't find a suitable "automated" way of measuring the health of a project in the way you are asking. The best you can do is to display such metrics as-is.
For an overall project health status, the project manager should be responsible for analyzing the metrics you are providing and manually determining the health of the project.
Again, I know it's subjective, but project management is as much art as it is science, and no software is ever going to be able to be able to nicely summarize the project status as well as a competent project manager. Even an incompetent project manager should be able to give a better status report than the computer. All the computer do is spit out stats. It takes someone who knows how to interpret the stats to put the stats in a nice "executive-level" summary.
发布评论
评论（1）
这是非常主观的，但在管理数百个项目后，这是我的两美分的价值。
每个项目都是如此独特，以至于您无法找到合适的“自动化”方法来按照您要求的方式衡量项目的运行状况。您能做的最好的事情就是按原样显示此类指标。
对于整体项目的健康状况，项目经理应负责分析您提供的指标并手动确定项目的健康状况。
再说一遍，我知道这是主观的，但项目管理既是艺术也是科学，没有任何软件能够像称职的项目经理一样很好地总结项目状态。即使是一个不称职的项目经理也应该能够给出比计算机更好的状态报告。计算机所做的就是输出统计数据。需要知道如何解释统计数据的人才能将统计数据放入漂亮的“执行级别”摘要中。
This is highly subjective, but here's my two cents worth after managing hundreds of projects.
Each project is so unique that you won't find a suitable "automated" way of measuring the health of a project in the way you are asking. The best you can do is to display such metrics as-is.
For an overall project health status, the project manager should be responsible for analyzing the metrics you are providing and manually determining the health of the project.
Again, I know it's subjective, but project management is as much art as it is science, and no software is ever going to be able to be able to nicely summarize the project status as well as a competent project manager. Even an incompetent project manager should be able to give a better status report than the computer. All the computer do is spit out stats. It takes someone who knows how to interpret the stats to put the stats in a nice "executive-level" summary.