该代码段看起来如何是伪代码？
我有这段代码：
for(iteration<string> it=name_list.iterator();it.hasNext();)
上面的代码合适的伪代码表示是什么？
I have this code:
for(iteration<string> it=name_list.iterator();it.hasNext();)
What would be a suitable pseudo-code representation for the above code?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
由于伪代码应该更易于人类阅读，所以我只是选择类似的内容：
您不需要在伪代码中添加迭代器等实现细节，而应该简单地指定意图.而且我发现 Python 的编码风格非常适合这类事情。
您还应该使用比
it更具描述性的名称。我假设这是针对迭代器的，但它绝对没有给出变量是什么的指示。这不仅是伪代码的目标，也是真实代码的目标。Since pseudo-code is meant to be more human-readable, I'd simply opt for something like:
You shouldn't have any need to put implementation details like iterators in your pseudo-code, rather you should simply specify intent. And I find the Python style of coding suits this sort of thing perfectly.
You should also use more descriptive names than
it. I'm assuming that's for iterator but it gives absolutely no indication as to what the variable is. This is something you should aim for not just in pseudo-code but in real code as well.将真实代码变成伪代码的最简单方法就是把它搞砸。 :-) 哇哈哈！
这可能会变成
name_list.iterator 的每次迭代，因为
它也可能变成数百个其他迭代！
The easiest way to make real code into pseudocode is to screw it up. :-) mwahahaha!
That could turn into
for each iteration of name_list.iterator as it
It could turn into hundreds of others too!
“对于 name_list 中的每个项目”至少这可能是意图。这段代码本身只是一个无限循环，因为它从不移动迭代器
"For each item in name_list" at least that's probably the intention. This code on its own is just an infinite loop though because it never moves the iterator