infragistics 控件与 asp.net 控件 - 性能

发布于 2024-10-22 03:20:20 字数 79 浏览 1 评论 0原文

ASP.NET 控件和 Infragistics 控件之间有性能比较吗?我需要比较所有控件,例如 TextBox、DropDownList 等。

Any performance comparision between asp.net controls and infragistics controls? I need to compare all controls e.g. TextBox, DropDownList etc.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

且行且努力 2024-10-29 03:20:20

可能不会。您可能需要澄清您所指的性能...可能性包括:

  • 服务器端性能(可能是数据绑定)
  • 所需的实际带宽(html 和额外脚本/样式/图像等的数量)
  • 客户端性能(事件及其他)
  • 回发?阿贾克斯?

进行性能比较非常困难,因为这在很大程度上取决于您需要的控件功能。一些 Infragistics Web 控件现在为您提供了仅加载您将使用的功能的 javascript 的选项,这会使事情变得复杂......我也想,存在很多第三方控件,因为没有 asp .net 默认等效项。

您确实可能需要尝试控件,或者设置目标性能级别并测量它是否满足此要求...asp.net 可能会执行得更快,但两者都满足您的性能要求...或者预期不满足您的性能要求,但为您提供更多功能...

Probably not. And you may need to clarify what performance you mean...possibilities include:

  • Server side performance (perhaps databinding)
  • Actual bandwidth (amount of html and extra scripts/styles/images etc) required
  • Client side performance (events and what not)
  • post backs? ajax?

It would be quite hard to do performance comparisons because it depends a lot on what features you require of the controls. Some of the Infragistics web controls now give you the option of only loading the javascript for features that you will use as well which would complicate things...I suppose also, a lot of the third party controls exist because there isn't an asp.net default equivalent.

You really perhaps need to try the controls, or set a target level of performance and measure whether it meets this...the asp.net may well perform faster but both meet your performance requirements...or expectedly don't meet your performance requirements but provide you more features...

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文