HasManyThrough 与 MappedManyToMany 有何不同？
大多数关于多对多关系文档的 lift-mapper 文档使用 MappedManyToMany 用于映射关系。但在探索 Lift 中，我看到了这一点作者使用 HasManyThrough 代替。
两者有什么区别？其中一个比另一个更受青睐吗？
Most of the lift-mapper documentation on many-to-many relationships documents the use of MappedManyToMany for mapping the relationship. But in in Exploring Lift, I see that the authors use HasManyThrough instead.
What's the difference between the two? Is one preferred over the other?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
HasManyThroughget来获取MappedManyToMany
句柄写入+=和-=添加和删除对象）至少这些是我的区别在我的项目中从
HasManyThrough移动到MappedManyToMany时注意到。因此，我认为 MappedManyToMany 是一个新版本，并且是首选版本，而出于兼容性原因，可能会保留 HasManyThrough。
HasManyThroughgeton it to get the elementsMappedManyToMany+=and-=)At least these are the differences I noticed when moving from
HasManyThroughtoMappedManyToManyin my project.So I think
MappedManyToManyis a new version and is the preferred one, whileHasManyThroughis propably kept for compatibility reasons.