rfc-info“帮助：ways_to_get_rfcs”是吗？死的？
我刚刚阅读“TCP/IP 图解”，发现查找所有 RFC 来源的方法之一是发送以下电子邮件：
To: [email protected]
Subject: getting rfcs
help: ways_to_get_rfcs
尝试一下它是为了好玩——我怎么可能不这样做，因为这是一种如此有趣/令人着迷的获取方式信息？我的意思是，您是否会考虑向某个远程地址发送电子邮件以获取获取 rfc 的方法？ -- 并收到“向以下收件人的递送永久失败”。我很确定它已经死了很久了，但你知道什么时候吗？
I was just reading "TCP/IP Illustrated" and found that one of the ways to find all sources of RFCs is to send the following email:
To: [email protected]
Subject: getting rfcs
help: ways_to_get_rfcs
Tried it for fun -- how could I not when it's such a interesting/intriguing way of getting info? I mean, would you even think of sending an email to some remote address to get the ways to get rfcs? -- and got "Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently". I'm pretty sure it's long dead, but do you know when?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
弄清楚这一点的最简单方法是查看旧的 RFC……它们在编号和日期上通常都是连续的（尽管诚然存在一些变化）。
RFC2700 - Pub 2000 年 8 月 包含对 [电子邮件受保护]
RFC2800 - Pub May 2001 不...
因此，在没有更详细的情况下，它是在 2000 年 8 月到 2001 年 5 月之间
。HTH，
\麦克风
The simplest way to figure it out is to look through the old RFCs... they're generally sequential in both numbering and dates (though there is admittedly some variation).
RFC2700 - Pub Aug 2000 Contains a reference to [email protected]
RFC2800 - Pub May 2001 Does not...
So without getting more granular, it was between August 2000 and May 2001.
HTH,
\mike