存储的 IP 地址重新分配后能否用于准确的地理定位？
如果获取一年前存储在数据库中的 IP 地址的地理位置，则该 IP 地址可能自存储以来已被重新分配，因此其当前位置与当时的位置不同。我想知道这个新位置通常是否可能位于原始位置附近（例如，从劳德代尔堡更改为迈阿密），或者相反，它是否可能被重新分配到完全不同的地方（例如底特律）。
If get the geolocation for an IP address that was stored in a database a year ago, the IP address may have been reassigned since it was stored, so that its current location is not the same as it was at that time. I am wondering if this new location is generally likely to be in the vicinity of the original location (eg, say a change from Ft. Lauderdale to Miami) or whether on the contrary it might get reassigned somewhere entirely different (eg Detroit).
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
“人们总是为不起作用的“癌症”治疗付费。供应商侥幸逃脱了惩罚，因为病人在他起诉之前就去世了……你需要地理定位，所以你要付费——尽管它本质上是不可靠的。 – John Saunders，2011 年 3 月 18 日 1:40"
正确。比这更糟糕。故意的错误地理位置以及对公共数据库的犯罪干扰被用来以电子方式隐藏人员。如果您不是参与有组织犯罪的人，那么准确且有意义的地理位置显然就像获得欧洲百万大奖一样有可能。
"people all the time pay for "cancer" treatments that don't work. The vendor gets away with it because the patient dies before he can sue...you need geolocation, so you pay for it - even though it's inherently unreliable. – John Saunders Mar 18 '11 at 1:40"
Correct. And its MUCH worse than that. Deliberate mis-geolocation along with criminal interference to public databases IS being used to electronically hide people. Accurate and meaningful Geolocation is evidently as likely as being paid a Euromillions Jackpot if youre not someone who is engaged in organised crime.