如何修剪 java stringbuilder?

发布于 2024-10-20 14:00:50 字数 269 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我有一个需要修剪的 StringBuilder 对象(即从任一端删除所有空白字符 /u0020 及以下)。

我似乎无法在字符串生成器中找到可以执行此操作的方法。

这就是我现在正在做的事情:

String trimmedStr = strBuilder.toString().trim();

这给出了所需的输出,但它需要分配两个字符串而不是一个。当字符串仍在 StringBuilder 中时,是否有更有效的方法来修剪字符串?

I have a StringBuilder object that needs to be trimmed (i.e. all whitespace chars /u0020 and below removed from either end).

I can't seem to find a method in string builder that would do this.

Here's what I'm doing now:

String trimmedStr = strBuilder.toString().trim();

This gives exactly the desired output, but it requires two Strings to be allocated instead of one. Is there a more efficient to trim the string while it's still in the StringBuilder?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(9

终弃我 2024-10-27 14:00:50

您不应该使用deleteCharAt方法。

正如Boris指出的,deleteCharAt方法每次都会复制数组。 Java 5 中执行此操作的代码如下所示:

public AbstractStringBuilder deleteCharAt(int index) {
    if ((index < 0) || (index >= count))
        throw new StringIndexOutOfBoundsException(index);
    System.arraycopy(value, index+1, value, index, count-index-1);
    count--;
    return this;
}

当然,仅靠推测不足以选择一种优化方法而不是另一种,因此我决定在此线程中对 3 种方法进行计时:原始方法、删除方法和子串方法。

下面是我测试的原始代码:

public static String trimOriginal(StringBuilder sb) {
    return sb.toString().trim();
}

删除方法:

public static String trimDelete(StringBuilder sb) {
    while (sb.length() > 0 && Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(0))) {
        sb.deleteCharAt(0);
    }
    while (sb.length() > 0 && Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(sb.length() - 1))) {
        sb.deleteCharAt(sb.length() - 1);
    }
    return sb.toString();
}

和子字符串方法:

public static String trimSubstring(StringBuilder sb) {
    int first, last;

    for (first=0; first<sb.length(); first++)
        if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(first)))
            break;

    for (last=sb.length(); last>first; last--)
        if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(last-1)))
            break;

    return sb.substring(first, last);
}

我执行了 100 次测试,每次生成一个百万字符的 StringBuffer,带有一万个尾随和前导空格。测试本身非常基础,但它很好地了解了方法需要多长时间。

下面是对 3 种方法进行计时的代码:

public static void main(String[] args) {

    long originalTime = 0;
    long deleteTime = 0;
    long substringTime = 0;

    for (int i=0; i<100; i++) {

        StringBuilder sb1 = new StringBuilder();
        StringBuilder sb2 = new StringBuilder();
        StringBuilder sb3 = new StringBuilder();

        for (int j=0; j<10000; j++) {
            sb1.append(" ");
            sb2.append(" ");
            sb3.append(" ");
        }
        for (int j=0; j<980000; j++) {
            sb1.append("a");
            sb2.append("a");
            sb3.append("a");
        }
        for (int j=0; j<10000; j++) {
            sb1.append(" ");
            sb2.append(" ");
            sb3.append(" ");
        }

        long timer1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        trimOriginal(sb1);
        originalTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer1;

        long timer2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        trimDelete(sb2);
        deleteTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer2;

        long timer3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        trimSubstring(sb3);
        substringTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer3;
    }

    System.out.println("original:  " + originalTime + " ms");
    System.out.println("delete:    " + deleteTime + " ms");
    System.out.println("substring: " + substringTime + " ms");
}

我得到了以下输出:

original:  176 ms
delete:    179242 ms
substring: 154 ms

正如我们所看到的,子字符串方法比原始的“两个字符串”方法提供了非常轻微的优化。然而,删除方法非常慢,应该避免。

因此,回答您的问题:您可以按照问题中建议的方式修剪 StringBuilder 。子字符串方法提供的非常轻微的优化可能并不能证明多余的代码是合理的。

You should not use the deleteCharAt approach.

As Boris pointed out, the deleteCharAt method copies the array over every time. The code in the Java 5 that does this looks like this:

public AbstractStringBuilder deleteCharAt(int index) {
    if ((index < 0) || (index >= count))
        throw new StringIndexOutOfBoundsException(index);
    System.arraycopy(value, index+1, value, index, count-index-1);
    count--;
    return this;
}

Of course, speculation alone is not enough to choose one method of optimization over another, so I decided to time the 3 approaches in this thread: the original, the delete approach, and the substring approach.

Here is the code I tested for the orignal:

public static String trimOriginal(StringBuilder sb) {
    return sb.toString().trim();
}

The delete approach:

public static String trimDelete(StringBuilder sb) {
    while (sb.length() > 0 && Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(0))) {
        sb.deleteCharAt(0);
    }
    while (sb.length() > 0 && Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(sb.length() - 1))) {
        sb.deleteCharAt(sb.length() - 1);
    }
    return sb.toString();
}

And the substring approach:

public static String trimSubstring(StringBuilder sb) {
    int first, last;

    for (first=0; first<sb.length(); first++)
        if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(first)))
            break;

    for (last=sb.length(); last>first; last--)
        if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(last-1)))
            break;

    return sb.substring(first, last);
}

I performed 100 tests, each time generating a million-character StringBuffer with ten thousand trailing and leading spaces. The testing itself is very basic, but it gives a good idea of how long the methods take.

Here is the code to time the 3 approaches:

public static void main(String[] args) {

    long originalTime = 0;
    long deleteTime = 0;
    long substringTime = 0;

    for (int i=0; i<100; i++) {

        StringBuilder sb1 = new StringBuilder();
        StringBuilder sb2 = new StringBuilder();
        StringBuilder sb3 = new StringBuilder();

        for (int j=0; j<10000; j++) {
            sb1.append(" ");
            sb2.append(" ");
            sb3.append(" ");
        }
        for (int j=0; j<980000; j++) {
            sb1.append("a");
            sb2.append("a");
            sb3.append("a");
        }
        for (int j=0; j<10000; j++) {
            sb1.append(" ");
            sb2.append(" ");
            sb3.append(" ");
        }

        long timer1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        trimOriginal(sb1);
        originalTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer1;

        long timer2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        trimDelete(sb2);
        deleteTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer2;

        long timer3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        trimSubstring(sb3);
        substringTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer3;
    }

    System.out.println("original:  " + originalTime + " ms");
    System.out.println("delete:    " + deleteTime + " ms");
    System.out.println("substring: " + substringTime + " ms");
}

I got the following output:

original:  176 ms
delete:    179242 ms
substring: 154 ms

As we see, the substring approach provides a very slight optimization over the original "two String" approach. However, the delete approach is extremely slow and should be avoided.

So to answer your question: you are fine trimming your StringBuilder the way you suggested in the question. The very slight optimization that the substring method offers probably does not justify the excess code.

茶色山野 2024-10-27 14:00:50

我使用了 Zaven 的分析方法和 StringBuilder 的 delete(start, end) 方法,该方法的性能远远优于 deleteCharAt(index) 方法,但比 稍差substring() 方法。此方法也使用数组复制,但调用数组复制的次数要少得多(最坏情况下仅调用两次)。此外,这避免创建中间字符串的多个实例,以防在同一个 StringBuilder 对象上重复调用 trim() 。

public class Main {

    public static String trimOriginal(StringBuilder sb) {
        return sb.toString().trim();
    }

    public static String trimDeleteRange(StringBuilder sb) {
        int first, last;

        for (first = 0; first < sb.length(); first++)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(first)))
                break;

        for (last = sb.length(); last > first; last--)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(last - 1)))
                break;

        if (first == last) {
            sb.delete(0, sb.length());
        } else {
           if (last < sb.length()) {
              sb.delete(last, sb.length());
           }
           if (first > 0) {
              sb.delete(0, first);
           }
        }
        return sb.toString();
    }


    public static String trimSubstring(StringBuilder sb) {
        int first, last;

        for (first = 0; first < sb.length(); first++)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(first)))
                break;

        for (last = sb.length(); last > first; last--)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(last - 1)))
                break;

        return sb.substring(first, last);
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        runAnalysis(1000);
        runAnalysis(10000);
        runAnalysis(100000);
        runAnalysis(200000);
        runAnalysis(500000);
        runAnalysis(1000000);
    }

    private static void runAnalysis(int stringLength) {
        System.out.println("Main:runAnalysis(string-length=" + stringLength + ")");

        long originalTime = 0;
        long deleteTime = 0;
        long substringTime = 0;

        for (int i = 0; i < 200; i++) {

            StringBuilder temp = new StringBuilder();
            char[] options = {' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'};
            for (int j = 0; j < stringLength; j++) {
                temp.append(options[(int) ((Math.random() * 1000)) % options.length]);
            }
            String testStr = temp.toString();

            StringBuilder sb1 = new StringBuilder(testStr);
            StringBuilder sb2 = new StringBuilder(testStr);
            StringBuilder sb3 = new StringBuilder(testStr);

            long timer1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            trimOriginal(sb1);
            originalTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer1;

            long timer2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            trimDeleteRange(sb2);
            deleteTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer2;

            long timer3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            trimSubstring(sb3);
            substringTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer3;
        }

        System.out.println("  original:     " + originalTime + " ms");
        System.out.println("  delete-range: " + deleteTime + " ms");
        System.out.println("  substring:    " + substringTime + " ms");
    }

}

输出:

Main:runAnalysis(string-length=1000)
  original:     0 ms
  delete-range: 4 ms
  substring:    0 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=10000)
  original:     4 ms
  delete-range: 9 ms
  substring:    4 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=100000)
  original:     22 ms
  delete-range: 33 ms
  substring:    43 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=200000)
  original:     57 ms
  delete-range: 93 ms
  substring:    110 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=500000)
  original:     266 ms
  delete-range: 220 ms
  substring:    191 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=1000000)
  original:     479 ms
  delete-range: 467 ms
  substring:    426 ms

I've used Zaven's analysis approach and StringBuilder's delete(start, end) method which performs far better than the deleteCharAt(index) approach, but slightly worse than the substring() approach. This method also uses the array copy, but array copy is called far fewer times (only twice in the worst case). In addition, this avoids creating multiple instances of intermediate Strings in case trim() is called repeatedly on the same StringBuilder object.

public class Main {

    public static String trimOriginal(StringBuilder sb) {
        return sb.toString().trim();
    }

    public static String trimDeleteRange(StringBuilder sb) {
        int first, last;

        for (first = 0; first < sb.length(); first++)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(first)))
                break;

        for (last = sb.length(); last > first; last--)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(last - 1)))
                break;

        if (first == last) {
            sb.delete(0, sb.length());
        } else {
           if (last < sb.length()) {
              sb.delete(last, sb.length());
           }
           if (first > 0) {
              sb.delete(0, first);
           }
        }
        return sb.toString();
    }


    public static String trimSubstring(StringBuilder sb) {
        int first, last;

        for (first = 0; first < sb.length(); first++)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(first)))
                break;

        for (last = sb.length(); last > first; last--)
            if (!Character.isWhitespace(sb.charAt(last - 1)))
                break;

        return sb.substring(first, last);
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        runAnalysis(1000);
        runAnalysis(10000);
        runAnalysis(100000);
        runAnalysis(200000);
        runAnalysis(500000);
        runAnalysis(1000000);
    }

    private static void runAnalysis(int stringLength) {
        System.out.println("Main:runAnalysis(string-length=" + stringLength + ")");

        long originalTime = 0;
        long deleteTime = 0;
        long substringTime = 0;

        for (int i = 0; i < 200; i++) {

            StringBuilder temp = new StringBuilder();
            char[] options = {' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd'};
            for (int j = 0; j < stringLength; j++) {
                temp.append(options[(int) ((Math.random() * 1000)) % options.length]);
            }
            String testStr = temp.toString();

            StringBuilder sb1 = new StringBuilder(testStr);
            StringBuilder sb2 = new StringBuilder(testStr);
            StringBuilder sb3 = new StringBuilder(testStr);

            long timer1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            trimOriginal(sb1);
            originalTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer1;

            long timer2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            trimDeleteRange(sb2);
            deleteTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer2;

            long timer3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
            trimSubstring(sb3);
            substringTime += System.currentTimeMillis() - timer3;
        }

        System.out.println("  original:     " + originalTime + " ms");
        System.out.println("  delete-range: " + deleteTime + " ms");
        System.out.println("  substring:    " + substringTime + " ms");
    }

}

Output:

Main:runAnalysis(string-length=1000)
  original:     0 ms
  delete-range: 4 ms
  substring:    0 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=10000)
  original:     4 ms
  delete-range: 9 ms
  substring:    4 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=100000)
  original:     22 ms
  delete-range: 33 ms
  substring:    43 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=200000)
  original:     57 ms
  delete-range: 93 ms
  substring:    110 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=500000)
  original:     266 ms
  delete-range: 220 ms
  substring:    191 ms
Main:runAnalysis(string-length=1000000)
  original:     479 ms
  delete-range: 467 ms
  substring:    426 ms
鹿童谣 2024-10-27 14:00:50

不用担心有两个字符串。这是一个微观优化。

如果您确实检测到瓶颈,则可以进行几乎恒定时间的修剪 - 只需迭代前 N 个字符,直到它们是 Character.isWhitespace(c)

Don't worry about having two strings. It's a microoptimization.

If you really have detected a bottleneck, you can have a nearly-constant-time trimming - just iterate the first N chars, until they are Character.isWhitespace(c)

甜扑 2024-10-27 14:00:50

只有一个人考虑到,当您将 String 构建器转换为“字符串”,然后“修剪”时,您创建了一个不可变对象两次,并且必须进行垃圾收集,
所以总的分配是:

  1. Stringbuilder对象
  2. SB对象的不可变字符串
    1 个已修剪字符串的不可变对象。

因此,虽然“看起来”修剪速度更快,但在现实世界中并且使用加载的内存方案时,实际上会更糟。

only one of you have taken into account that when you convert the String builder to a "string" and then "trim" that you create an immutable object twice that has to be garbage collected,
so the total allocation is:

  1. Stringbuilder object
  2. immutable string of the SB object
    1 immutable object of the string that has been trimmed.

So whilst it may "appear" that the trim is faster, in the real world and with a loaded memory scheme it will in fact be worse.

半世蒼涼 2024-10-27 14:00:50

我一开始也有你的问题,但是,经过 5 分钟的思考,我意识到实际上你永远不需要修剪 StringBuffer!您只需修剪附加到 StringBuffer 中的字符串

如果你想修剪初始 StringBuffer,你可以这样做:

StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(initialStr.trim());

如果你想即时修剪 StringBuffer,你可以在追加期间执行此操作:

Sb.append(addOnStr.trim());

I had exactly your question at first, however, after 5-minute's second thought, I realized actually you never need to trim the StringBuffer! You only need to trim the string you append into the StringBuffer.

If you want to trim an initial StringBuffer, you can do this:

StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(initialStr.trim());

If you want to trim StringBuffer on-the-fly, you can do this during append:

Sb.append(addOnStr.trim());
煮茶煮酒煮时光 2024-10-27 14:00:50

您得到两个字符串,但我希望数据仅分配一次。由于 Java 中的字符串是不可变的,因此我希望修剪实现能够为您提供一个共享相同字符数据但具有不同开始和结束索引的对象。至少 substr 方法就是这么做的。因此,任何你尝试优化的事情肯定会产生相反的效果,因为你增加了不需要的开销。

只需使用调试器单步执行 trim() 方法即可。

You get two strings, but I'd expect the data to be only allocated once. Since Strings in Java are immutable, I'd expect the trim implementation to give you an object that shares the same character data, but with different start- and end indices. At least that's what the substr method does. So, anything you try to optimise this most certainly will have the opposite effect, since you add overhead that is not needed.

Just step through the trim() method with your debugger.

幸福丶如此 2024-10-27 14:00:50

我做了一些代码。它可以工作,并且测试用例就在那里供您查看。让我知道这是否可以。

主要代码 -

public static StringBuilder trimStringBuilderSpaces(StringBuilder sb) {

    int len = sb.length();

    if (len > 0) {

            int start = 0;
            int end = 1;
            char space = ' ';
            int i = 0;

            // Remove spaces at start
            for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
                if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                    break;
                }
            }

            end = i;
            //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
            sb.delete(start, end);

            // Remove the ending spaces
            len = sb.length();

            if (len > 1) {

                for (i = len - 1; i > 0; i--) {
                    if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                        i = i + 1;
                        break;
                    }
                }

                start = i;
                end = len;// or len + any positive number !

                //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
                sb.delete(start, end);

            }

    }

    return sb;
}

带测试的完整代码 -

package source;

import java.io.PrintWriter;
import java.io.StringWriter;
import java.util.ArrayList;

public class StringBuilderTrim {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        testCode();
    }

    public static void testCode() {

        StringBuilder s1 = new StringBuilder("");
        StringBuilder s2 = new StringBuilder(" ");
        StringBuilder s3 = new StringBuilder("  ");
        StringBuilder s4 = new StringBuilder(" 123");
        StringBuilder s5 = new StringBuilder("  123");
        StringBuilder s6 = new StringBuilder("1");
        StringBuilder s7 = new StringBuilder("123 ");
        StringBuilder s8 = new StringBuilder("123  ");
        StringBuilder s9 = new StringBuilder(" 123 ");
        StringBuilder s10 = new StringBuilder("  123  ");

        /*
         * Using a rough form of TDD here. Initially, one one test input
         * "test case" was added and rest were commented. Write no code for the
         * method being tested. So, the test will fail. Write just enough code
         * to make it pass. Then, enable the next test. Repeat !!!
         */
        ArrayList<StringBuilder> ins = new ArrayList<StringBuilder>();
        ins.add(s1);
        ins.add(s2);
        ins.add(s3);
        ins.add(s4);
        ins.add(s5);
        ins.add(s6);
        ins.add(s7);
        ins.add(s8);
        ins.add(s9);
        ins.add(s10);

        // Run test
        for (StringBuilder sb : ins) {
            System.out
                    .println("\n\n---------------------------------------------");
            String expected = sb.toString().trim();
            String result = trimStringBuilderSpaces(sb).toString();
            System.out.println("In [" + sb + "]" + ", Expected [" + expected
                    + "]" + ", Out [" + result + "]");
            if (result.equals(expected)) {
                System.out.println("Success!");
            } else {
                System.out.println("FAILED!");
            }
            System.out.println("---------------------------------------------");
        }

    }

    public static StringBuilder trimStringBuilderSpaces(StringBuilder inputSb) {

        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(inputSb);
        int len = sb.length();

        if (len > 0) {

            try {

                int start = 0;
                int end = 1;
                char space = ' ';
                int i = 0;

                // Remove spaces at start
                for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
                    if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                        break;
                    }
                }

                end = i;
                //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
                sb.delete(start, end);

                // Remove the ending spaces
                len = sb.length();

                if (len > 1) {

                    for (i = len - 1; i > 0; i--) {
                        if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                            i = i + 1;
                            break;
                        }
                    }

                    start = i;
                    end = len;// or len + any positive number !

                    //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
                    sb.delete(start, end);

                }

            } catch (Exception ex) {

                StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();
                PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(sw);
                ex.printStackTrace(pw);
                sw.toString(); // stack trace as a string

                sb = new StringBuilder("\nNo Out due to error:\n" + "\n" + sw);
                return sb;
            }

        }

        return sb;
    }
}

I made some code. It works and the test cases are there for you to see. Let me know if this is okay.

Main code -

public static StringBuilder trimStringBuilderSpaces(StringBuilder sb) {

    int len = sb.length();

    if (len > 0) {

            int start = 0;
            int end = 1;
            char space = ' ';
            int i = 0;

            // Remove spaces at start
            for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
                if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                    break;
                }
            }

            end = i;
            //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
            sb.delete(start, end);

            // Remove the ending spaces
            len = sb.length();

            if (len > 1) {

                for (i = len - 1; i > 0; i--) {
                    if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                        i = i + 1;
                        break;
                    }
                }

                start = i;
                end = len;// or len + any positive number !

                //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
                sb.delete(start, end);

            }

    }

    return sb;
}

The full code with test -

package source;

import java.io.PrintWriter;
import java.io.StringWriter;
import java.util.ArrayList;

public class StringBuilderTrim {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        testCode();
    }

    public static void testCode() {

        StringBuilder s1 = new StringBuilder("");
        StringBuilder s2 = new StringBuilder(" ");
        StringBuilder s3 = new StringBuilder("  ");
        StringBuilder s4 = new StringBuilder(" 123");
        StringBuilder s5 = new StringBuilder("  123");
        StringBuilder s6 = new StringBuilder("1");
        StringBuilder s7 = new StringBuilder("123 ");
        StringBuilder s8 = new StringBuilder("123  ");
        StringBuilder s9 = new StringBuilder(" 123 ");
        StringBuilder s10 = new StringBuilder("  123  ");

        /*
         * Using a rough form of TDD here. Initially, one one test input
         * "test case" was added and rest were commented. Write no code for the
         * method being tested. So, the test will fail. Write just enough code
         * to make it pass. Then, enable the next test. Repeat !!!
         */
        ArrayList<StringBuilder> ins = new ArrayList<StringBuilder>();
        ins.add(s1);
        ins.add(s2);
        ins.add(s3);
        ins.add(s4);
        ins.add(s5);
        ins.add(s6);
        ins.add(s7);
        ins.add(s8);
        ins.add(s9);
        ins.add(s10);

        // Run test
        for (StringBuilder sb : ins) {
            System.out
                    .println("\n\n---------------------------------------------");
            String expected = sb.toString().trim();
            String result = trimStringBuilderSpaces(sb).toString();
            System.out.println("In [" + sb + "]" + ", Expected [" + expected
                    + "]" + ", Out [" + result + "]");
            if (result.equals(expected)) {
                System.out.println("Success!");
            } else {
                System.out.println("FAILED!");
            }
            System.out.println("---------------------------------------------");
        }

    }

    public static StringBuilder trimStringBuilderSpaces(StringBuilder inputSb) {

        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(inputSb);
        int len = sb.length();

        if (len > 0) {

            try {

                int start = 0;
                int end = 1;
                char space = ' ';
                int i = 0;

                // Remove spaces at start
                for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
                    if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                        break;
                    }
                }

                end = i;
                //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
                sb.delete(start, end);

                // Remove the ending spaces
                len = sb.length();

                if (len > 1) {

                    for (i = len - 1; i > 0; i--) {
                        if (sb.charAt(i) != space) {
                            i = i + 1;
                            break;
                        }
                    }

                    start = i;
                    end = len;// or len + any positive number !

                    //System.out.println("s = " + start + ", e = " + end);
                    sb.delete(start, end);

                }

            } catch (Exception ex) {

                StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();
                PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(sw);
                ex.printStackTrace(pw);
                sw.toString(); // stack trace as a string

                sb = new StringBuilder("\nNo Out due to error:\n" + "\n" + sw);
                return sb;
            }

        }

        return sb;
    }
}
沧桑㈠ 2024-10-27 14:00:50
strBuilder.replace(0,strBuilder.length(),strBuilder.toString().trim());
strBuilder.replace(0,strBuilder.length(),strBuilder.toString().trim());
苏辞 2024-10-27 14:00:50

由于deleteCharAt()每次都会复制数组,所以我提供了下面的代码,在最坏的情况下,当StringBuilder同时具有前导和尾随空格时,它会复制数组两次。下面的代码将确保对象引用保持不变,并且我们不会创建新对象。

    public static void trimStringBuilder(StringBuilder builder) {
        int len = builder.length();
        int start = 0;
        // Remove whitespace from start
        while (start < len && builder.charAt(start) == ' ') {
            start++;
        }
        if (start > 0) {
            builder.delete(0, start);
        }
    
        len = builder.length();
        int end = len;
        // Remove whitespace from end
        while (end > 0 && builder.charAt(end - 1) == ' ') {
            end--;
        }
        if (end < len) {
            builder.delete(end, len);
        }
    }

Since deleteCharAt() copies array each time, I have come with below code which copies array two times in worst case when StringBuilder have both leading and trailing whitespace. Below code will make sure that object reference remains same and we are not creating new object.

    public static void trimStringBuilder(StringBuilder builder) {
        int len = builder.length();
        int start = 0;
        // Remove whitespace from start
        while (start < len && builder.charAt(start) == ' ') {
            start++;
        }
        if (start > 0) {
            builder.delete(0, start);
        }
    
        len = builder.length();
        int end = len;
        // Remove whitespace from end
        while (end > 0 && builder.charAt(end - 1) == ' ') {
            end--;
        }
        if (end < len) {
            builder.delete(end, len);
        }
    }
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文