We have recently completed a project using XAdES-BES signatures in both enveloped and enveloping forms. We chose the XAdES4j project because it seemed the most complete, and XAdES was a core requirement.
The support on the Q&A section is sometimes slow, and and only the most obvious use case is well documented. That said the library is well tested, excellently designed, and very useful.
We spent a couple of weeks getting our heads around it and I would now recommend it as a platform.
The only caveat is that (as you say) it is the production of an academic project, so how much support it will receive in the future is anyone's guess. If you pick it up and buy into it then consider contributing, and it might pick up a bit of speed.
You can look at the "Componentes de firma", a LGPL suite of components created and mantained by the Spanish government. It's a full cryptographic suite that supports creation and validation of the following XAdES formats:
XAdES-BES
XAdES-T
XAdES-C
XAdES-X
XAdES-XL
XAdES-EPES
With detached, enveloped, enveloping and mixed signatures.
Just to complete the list, XMLBlackbox package of our SecureBlackbox (Java edition) offers full support for all XAdES versions and is actively maintained and supported.
发布评论
评论（3）
我们最近完成了一个使用 XAdES-BES 签名（以信封形式和信封形式）的项目。我们选择 XAdES4j 项目是因为它看起来最完整，而 XAdES 是核心需求。
问答部分的支持有时很慢，并且只有最明显的用例才有详细记录。也就是说，该库经过了良好的测试、设计出色并且非常有用。
我们花了几周时间来研究它，现在我推荐它作为一个平台。
唯一需要注意的是（正如你所说）它是一个学术项目的成果，所以它未来会得到多少支持是任何人的猜测。如果你选择并购买它，然后考虑做出贡献，它可能会加快一些速度。
We have recently completed a project using XAdES-BES signatures in both enveloped and enveloping forms. We chose the XAdES4j project because it seemed the most complete, and XAdES was a core requirement.
The support on the Q&A section is sometimes slow, and and only the most obvious use case is well documented. That said the library is well tested, excellently designed, and very useful.
We spent a couple of weeks getting our heads around it and I would now recommend it as a platform.
The only caveat is that (as you say) it is the production of an academic project, so how much support it will receive in the future is anyone's guess. If you pick it up and buy into it then consider contributing, and it might pick up a bit of speed.
您可以查看“Componentes de Firma”，这是由西班牙政府创建和维护的 LGPL 组件套件。它是一个完整的加密套件，支持创建和验证以下 XAdES 格式：
具有分离、包封、包封和混合签名。
XAdES 签名的详细说明可以在 http://oficinavirtual.mityc.es/componentes 找到/MITyCLibXADES/index.html，下载站点为http://oficinavirtual.mityc .es/componentes/downloads.html
You can look at the "Componentes de firma", a LGPL suite of components created and mantained by the Spanish government. It's a full cryptographic suite that supports creation and validation of the following XAdES formats:
With detached, enveloped, enveloping and mixed signatures.
Detailed description of the XAdES signatures can be found at http://oficinavirtual.mityc.es/componentes/MITyCLibXADES/index.html, and the download site is http://oficinavirtual.mityc.es/componentes/downloads.html
为了完成该列表，我们的 SecureBlackbox（Java 版）的 XMLBlackbox 包提供了完整的支持所有 XAdES 版本，并得到积极维护和支持。
Just to complete the list, XMLBlackbox package of our SecureBlackbox (Java edition) offers full support for all XAdES versions and is actively maintained and supported.