图像地图（html 标签 -
有谁知道图像地图是否被谷歌抓取有一定程度的确定性？
我想实现一个图像栏 - 上面有我们合作伙伴的 10 个徽标，并使用图像映射链接到他们的网站。谷歌的蜘蛛能爬行吗？
<img src="planets.gif" width="145" height="126" alt="Partners" usemap="#partnermap" />
<map name="partnermap">
<area shape="rect" coords="0,0,82,126" href="http://partner1.com" alt="Partner1" />
<area shape="circle" coords="90,58,3" href="http://partner2.com" alt="Partner2" />
<area shape="circle" coords="124,58,8" href="http://partner3.com" alt="Partner3" />
etc ....
</map>
谢谢
Does anyone know with any degree of certainty if image maps are crawled by google?
I want to implement an image bar - that has 10 logos of our partners on, and use imagemap to link to their websites. Would google's spider be able to crawl it?
<img src="planets.gif" width="145" height="126" alt="Partners" usemap="#partnermap" />
<map name="partnermap">
<area shape="rect" coords="0,0,82,126" href="http://partner1.com" alt="Partner1" />
<area shape="circle" coords="90,58,3" href="http://partner2.com" alt="Partner2" />
<area shape="circle" coords="124,58,8" href="http://partner3.com" alt="Partner3" />
etc ....
</map>
Thank you
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
是的，但它们被视为图形链接，并不那么重要。如果包含替代文本和标题文本，我认为它的排名会更高一些。
Yes, but they are treated as graphical links and are not as important. If you include alt text and title text, I think it will be ranked a little higher.
我最近也想知道这个问题，并在有关企业网站搜索的 Google 开发人员说明中发现了这一点 - https://developers.google.com/search-appliance/documentation/68/admin_crawl/Introduction#areatag
这表明 Google Search Appliance 抓取工具不会跟踪这些链接。我不知道对于普通的 Googlebot 是否也是如此，但似乎很可能......
I've been wondering this recently too and found this within the Google developer instructions around enterprise site search - https://developers.google.com/search-appliance/documentation/68/admin_crawl/Introduction#areatag
This suggests that the Google Search Appliance crawler will not follow these links. Whether that is also true for regular Googlebot I don't know but it would seem likely...