静态 pthread 互斥体初始化

发布于 2024-10-19 12:31:16 字数 280 浏览 2 评论 0原文

使用 pthreads,在 C 语言中如何初始化互斥体的静态数组?

对于单个静态互斥体,我似乎可以使用 PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER 。但是它们的静态数组又如何呢?例如,

#include <pthread.h>
#define NUM_THREADS 5

/*initialize static mutex array*/
static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS] = ...?

或者它们必须动态分配吗?

Using pthreads, how would one, in C, initialize a static array of mutexes?

For a single static mutex, it seems I can use PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER. But what about an static array of them? As, in for example,

#include <pthread.h>
#define NUM_THREADS 5

/*initialize static mutex array*/
static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS] = ...?

Or must they be allocated dynamically?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

小红帽 2024-10-26 12:31:17

不,您不必动态创建它们。您可以使用静态数组,只需在使用它们之前将它们全部设置好即可。你可以这样做:

#define NUM_THREADS 5
static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS] = {
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
};

如果你改变NUM_THREADS,这很容易出错,尽管这可以用类似的东西来修复:

static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[] = {
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
};
#define NUM_THREADS (sizeof(mutexes)/sizeof(*mutexes))

或者,你可以用代码来做到这一点,例如:

#define NUM_THREADS 5
static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS];

// Other stuff

int main (void) {
    for (int i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++)
        pthread_mutex_init(&mutexes[i], NULL);
    // Now you can use them safely.

    return 0;
}

在所有这些情况下,他们'在尝试使用它们之前请先正确设置。事实上,我会在你做任何线程的事情之前就做好,但这只是我的偏执。

No, you don't have to create them dynamically. You can use a static array, you just have to get them all set up before you use them. You can do:

#define NUM_THREADS 5
static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS] = {
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
};

which is prone to errors if you ever change NUM_THREADS, though that can be fixed with something like:

static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[] = {
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
    PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
};
#define NUM_THREADS (sizeof(mutexes)/sizeof(*mutexes))

Alternatively, you can do it with code, such as:

#define NUM_THREADS 5
static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS];

// Other stuff

int main (void) {
    for (int i = 0; i < NUM_THREADS; i++)
        pthread_mutex_init(&mutexes[i], NULL);
    // Now you can use them safely.

    return 0;
}

In all those cases, they're correctly set up before you try to use them. In fact, I'd do it well before you do any threading stuff but that's just me being paranoid.

予囚 2024-10-26 12:31:17

如果您有符合 C99 标准的编译器,则可以使用 P99 进行初始化:

static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS] =
  { P99_DUPL(NUM_THREADS, PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER) };

这只是重复令牌序列 PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER 所请求的次数。

为此,您只需确保 NUM_THREADS 不会扩展为变量,而是扩展为预处理器可见且不太大的十进制整数常量。

If you have a C99 conforming compiler you can use P99 to do your initialization:

static pthread_mutex_t mutexes[NUM_THREADS] =
  { P99_DUPL(NUM_THREADS, PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER) };

This just repeats the token sequence PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER, the requested number of times.

For this to work you only have to be sure that NUM_THREADS doesn't expand to a variable but to a decimal integer constant that is visible to the preprocessor and that is not too large.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文