The Atlassian suite of software would seem to be a good fit and is very cheaply priced for a few users ($10 for up to ten users). I've direct (and good!) experience of using JIRA and find it very simple to use and flexible enough for my needs. Another alternative would be FogBugz, but I've no first-hand experience of using this.
对于 FogBugz，非常值得看看它背后的流程，在从事过许多非软件项目之后，我相信这是一种普遍有效的方法（即使 Joel 的想法有点古怪......）。 我使用 SmartSheet，因为它很简单，但仍然具有分层任务，正如您在问题中所述。它擅长与人打交道，不太可能擅长管理代码，而 FogBugz 可能会做到这一点。 SS over Atl 和其他的一个关键特性是额外的用户无需付费。 您必须做出的一个决定是，您希望项目计划以许多利益相关者可以理解的简单方式输出，还是以详细方式输出，以便您可以跟踪大量活动。显然细节需要努力。 通过提出问题，您已经有了一个良好的开端，您的管理文化很可能比您选择的工具更有价值。
再见
re FogBugz, it is well worth having a look at the processes behind it, having worked on many non software projects I believe it is a universally sound methodology (even if Joel is a little quirky in his thinking.....). I use SmartSheet because it is simple, but still has heirachial tasking, as you have set out in the question. It is good at dealing with people, unlikely it is good at manageing code, whereas FogBugz presumably does that. A key feature of SS over Atl and others is additional users cost nothing. One decision you have to make is do you want the project plan to be output in a simple way which many stakeholders can understand, or detailed so you can track much activity. Obviously the detail will require effort. You have made a good start by setting out the issues, your culture of management may well be more valuable than the tool you choose.
发布评论
评论（2）
Atlassian 软件套件似乎很合适，而且对于少数用户来说价格非常便宜（10 美元）最多十个用户）。我有直接（而且很好！）使用 JIRA 的经验，发现它使用起来非常简单，而且足够灵活，足以满足我的需求。另一种选择是 FogBugz，但我没有使用它的第一手经验。
The Atlassian suite of software would seem to be a good fit and is very cheaply priced for a few users ($10 for up to ten users). I've direct (and good!) experience of using JIRA and find it very simple to use and flexible enough for my needs. Another alternative would be FogBugz, but I've no first-hand experience of using this.
对于 FogBugz，非常值得看看它背后的流程，在从事过许多非软件项目之后，我相信这是一种普遍有效的方法（即使 Joel 的想法有点古怪......）。
我使用 SmartSheet，因为它很简单，但仍然具有分层任务，正如您在问题中所述。它擅长与人打交道，不太可能擅长管理代码，而 FogBugz 可能会做到这一点。
SS over Atl 和其他的一个关键特性是额外的用户无需付费。
您必须做出的一个决定是，您希望项目计划以许多利益相关者可以理解的简单方式输出，还是以详细方式输出，以便您可以跟踪大量活动。显然细节需要努力。
通过提出问题，您已经有了一个良好的开端，您的管理文化很可能比您选择的工具更有价值。
再见
re FogBugz, it is well worth having a look at the processes behind it, having worked on many non software projects I believe it is a universally sound methodology (even if Joel is a little quirky in his thinking.....).
I use SmartSheet because it is simple, but still has heirachial tasking, as you have set out in the question. It is good at dealing with people, unlikely it is good at manageing code, whereas FogBugz presumably does that.
A key feature of SS over Atl and others is additional users cost nothing.
One decision you have to make is do you want the project plan to be output in a simple way which many stakeholders can understand, or detailed so you can track much activity. Obviously the detail will require effort.
You have made a good start by setting out the issues, your culture of management may well be more valuable than the tool you choose.
ciao