Personally I'd choose DevX. I'm pleased with their support and I know their controls because I've used them ( for ASP.NET, WinForms ).
A good choice, nevertheless is to choose one you know. To be fair: All grid components will do great if you're on the standard track. As soon as you'll have something to implement that is not a general purpose usage it will get harder. This is - IMHO - true for all third party controls.
At least DevX has forums installed, maybe take a look there and on the forums of the other two options. Compare based on your needs and what you find online. That's the best suggestion you can get.
And by the way: we're all here in our spare time. We're not paid answering machines. So tell it's urgent, but do not await a quick reply. That could be seen as really impolite.
I've worked with the XamDataGrid and it requires hours of maintenance after each feature around it to keep all the features like grouping working. On top of that, it doesn't quite support templates the way that all of the .Net framework controls do. It is quite painful to template anything.
I would stay away from the Infragistics controls, and I use the DataGrid included in the framework wherever possible since my organization will not buy a license for another grid.
Worked with both Infragistics and DevExpress grid. If you need to get in deep and use lots of functionality offered by one, go with DevExpress. Our application uses server-side binding where you have business objects talking to database using stored procedures. Grid itself has no control over the query parameters. With this type of binding, you have to use lot's of customization and we ended up switching to DevExpress, because Ifragistices just couldn't handle it, there were bugs that our best programmers were not able to overcome. After we started using DevXpress Grid, we ended up replacing all Ifragistics controls with DevX and cancelling the subscription. It took over two month of labor but was totally worth it.
I am only familiar with the Infragistics controls and would encourage you to evaluate the controls on your own to see which control will best meet your needs.
发布评论
评论（5）
我个人会选择 DevX。我对他们的支持感到满意，并且我了解他们的控件，因为我使用过它们（对于 ASP.NET、WinForms）。
不过，选择一个你认识的人是一个不错的选择。公平地说：如果您在标准轨道上，所有网格组件都会表现出色。一旦你要实现的东西不是通用用途，它就会变得更加困难。恕我直言，这对于所有第三方控件都是如此。
至少 DevX 安装了论坛，也许可以看看那里以及其他两个选项的论坛。根据您的需求和您在网上找到的内容进行比较。这是你能得到的最好的建议。
顺便说一句：我们都是在业余时间来这里的。我们没有付费答录机。因此，请告知情况紧急，但不要等待快速回复。这可能会被视为非常不礼貌的行为。
Personally I'd choose DevX. I'm pleased with their support and I know their controls because I've used them ( for ASP.NET, WinForms ).
A good choice, nevertheless is to choose one you know. To be fair: All grid components will do great if you're on the standard track. As soon as you'll have something to implement that is not a general purpose usage it will get harder. This is - IMHO - true for all third party controls.
At least DevX has forums installed, maybe take a look there and on the forums of the other two options. Compare based on your needs and what you find online. That's the best suggestion you can get.
And by the way: we're all here in our spare time. We're not paid answering machines. So tell it's urgent, but do not await a quick reply. That could be seen as really impolite.
我已经用过它们了，底线是这样的：
devexpress 具有出色的质量和功能，但有一个更大的学习曲线
Telerik 很棒；功能不像 devex 那样丰富，但更容易启动和运行
infragistics / 组件一在我看来“也运行”
I have used them all and the bottom line is this:
devexpress are outstanding quality and functionality but have a greater learning curve
Telerik are great; not quite as feature rich as devex but easier to get up and running
infragistics / component one are in my view "also rans"
我使用过 XamDataGrid，在它周围的每个功能之后都需要数小时的维护才能保持分组等所有功能正常工作。最重要的是，它并不像所有 .Net 框架控件那样完全支持模板。模板化任何东西都是非常痛苦的。
我会远离 Infragistics 控件，并尽可能使用框架中包含的 DataGrid，因为我的组织不会购买另一个网格的许可证。
I've worked with the XamDataGrid and it requires hours of maintenance after each feature around it to keep all the features like grouping working. On top of that, it doesn't quite support templates the way that all of the .Net framework controls do. It is quite painful to template anything.
I would stay away from the Infragistics controls, and I use the DataGrid included in the framework wherever possible since my organization will not buy a license for another grid.
使用 Infragistics 和 DevExpress 网格。如果您需要深入了解并使用其中提供的大量功能，请选择 DevExpress。我们的应用程序使用服务器端绑定，其中业务对象使用存储过程与数据库进行通信。网格本身无法控制查询参数。对于这种类型的绑定，您必须使用大量的自定义，我们最终切换到 DevExpress，因为 Ifragistices 无法处理它，有些错误是我们最好的程序员无法克服的。在我们开始使用 DevXpress Grid 后，我们最终用 DevX 替换了所有 Ifragistics 控件并取消了订阅。虽然花了两个多月的时间，但完全值得。
Worked with both Infragistics and DevExpress grid. If you need to get in deep and use lots of functionality offered by one, go with DevExpress. Our application uses server-side binding where you have business objects talking to database using stored procedures. Grid itself has no control over the query parameters. With this type of binding, you have to use lot's of customization and we ended up switching to DevExpress, because Ifragistices just couldn't handle it, there were bugs that our best programmers were not able to overcome. After we started using DevXpress Grid, we ended up replacing all Ifragistics controls with DevX and cancelling the subscription. It took over two month of labor but was totally worth it.
我只熟悉 Infragistics 控件，并鼓励您自行评估控件，看看哪种控件最能满足您的需求。
Infragistics 有两个 WPF 网格：XamDataGrid 和 XamGrid。这里的博客文章对两者进行了比较，可能会帮助您决定是否尝试确定两者之间哪个网格更好：
http ://blogs.infragistics.com/blogs/engineering/archive/2011/11/11/xamgrid-vs-xamdatagrid-conceptual-and-feature-comparison.aspx
I am only familiar with the Infragistics controls and would encourage you to evaluate the controls on your own to see which control will best meet your needs.
Infragistics has two WPF grids, the XamDataGrid and the XamGrid. The blog post here compares the two and may help you decide if you are trying to decide which grid would be better between the two:
http://blogs.infragistics.com/blogs/engineering/archive/2011/11/11/xamgrid-vs-xamdatagrid-conceptual-and-feature-comparison.aspx