罗德 vs 钛
这是开发跨平台应用程序的最佳框架。特别是对于安卓和苹果手机。我浏览过互联网上的评论，但这些评论似乎已经很老了。我相信 Titanium 和 Rhodes 在过去几年中都取得了很大的发展。
Which is the best framework to develop cross platform application. Especially for android and iphone. I have been through the reviews present over the internet, but those seem to be pretty old. I believe both Titanium and Rhodes have developed much over the past couple of years.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
基本区别之一是两个框架的原生性。 Rhodes Framework 和 Titanium 都声称是原生。然而，Rhodes 并不是真正的原生，即它使用嵌入式 Web 浏览器来显示 HTML 编码的网站。然而，Titanium 会使用您的 JavaScript 代码，并在相应的平台上创建真正的本机小部件。
那么本土化有什么重要的呢？嗯，它使用户体验变得更好。
Rhodes Framework 最好被描述为 PhoneGap 的竞争对手。
据我所知，Rhodes 最适合企业应用程序。 我通常会向大多数应用开发者推荐 Titanium。
One of the basic differences is the nativeness of the two frameworks. Both Rhodes Framework and Titanium claim to be native. Rhodes however is not really native i.e. it uses an embedded Web Browser to display the HTML-coded website. Titanium, however, takes your JavaScript code, and create real native widgets on the respective platforms.
So what's so important about native? Well, it makes the user experience a whole lot better.
Rhodes Framework is best described as a competitor to PhoneGap.
From my knowledge, Rhodes is best for enterprisey apps. I would generally recommended Titanium for most app developers.
虽然我没有使用过Rhodes，但根据我读到的有关Rhodes 的内容，我觉得Titanium 更好。 Titaniums 中的 JS 语法也很容易上手。但是，据我所知，了解本机代码的工作原理对于理解和解释某些行为很有用。我最近发现的框架还有一个比较 这里。
Though I have not used Rhodes, I feel Titanium is better based on what I read about Rhodes. The JS syntax in Titaniums is also easy to ramp up on. But, from what I have seen, understanding the working of the native code is useful to understand and explain some of the behavior. There is one more comparison of the frameworks that I found recently here.