边缘服务器包括 (ESI)
使用 ESI 是一种好的做法还是一种较旧的技术？有没有更好的替代方案。我熟悉 CDN 和缓存服务器的使用，但此 ESI 通常适用于不仅仅加载前端的应用程序。
Is it a good practice to use ESI's or is that an older technology? are there alternatives that would be better. I am familiar with the use of CDN's and cache servers but this ESI was typically for applications that do more than just load the front end.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
ESI 在 CDN 环境之外相当不为人知。然而，我认为现在有许多有趣的用例可以将其“更接近”源服务器，因为我们看到人们对将提供网站的应用程序拆分为多个独立服务更加感兴趣。支持 ESI 的缓存是将这些服务集成到单个网站的好方法。
ESI is fairly unknown outside the CDN context. However, I think there are a number of interesting use cases for its use 'closer' to the origin servers now that we see a lot more interest in splitting the applications that deliver Web sites into several self-contained services. An ESI-enabled cache is a good means to integrate these services into a single Web site.