我们的设计师使用 Visual Studio 2010 来编辑 MVC 3 视图。我们花了几天的时间来讨论他们需要了解的所有信息，而且如果他们有疑问，我们会随时为他们提供帮助。我们的团队由 4 名程序员（2 名程序员，2 名设计师）组成，我们都已连接到 TFS 2010，这是让他们使用 Visual Studio 的另一个原因。
任何值得薪水的设计师都应该能够弄清楚如何使用 Visual Studio 来编辑标记。
Our designers use Visual Studio 2010 for editing our MVC 3 views. It took a couple days of meetings to just go over all the information they needed to know, plus we're here to help them if they have questions. We're on a team of 4 (2 programmers, 2 designers) and we're all plugged in to TFS 2010, which is another reason to have them on Visual Studio.
There's no reason any designer worth their salary shouldn't be able to figure out how to use Visual Studio for editing markup.
问题是，进行设计工作的用户在不实际运行应用程序的情况下永远无法预览视图的外观。所以基本上他们只需要一个好的文本编辑器，而 Visual Studio 和这里的任何编辑器一样好。
好处是您可以在运行时更改视图并刷新页面，您将看到所做的更改，这会导致非常高效的 do markup ->刷新开发循环。
The problem is the user doing the design work will never get a preview of what the view looks like without actually running the app. So basically they just need a good text editor, and Visual Studio is just as good as any here.
The nice thing is you can alter a view at runtime and refresh the page and you'll see your changes, which leads to a pretty efficient do markup -> refresh development loop.
I agree with the others here that Visual Studio is the way to go but if there's some reason you don't want to use Visual Studio then WebMatrix maybe an alternative option in the future, but it currently only supports Razor views. It's underrated as a quick and simple way of editing Views, HTML, CSS, JavaScript etc.
发布评论
评论（3）
我们的设计师使用 Visual Studio 2010 来编辑 MVC 3 视图。我们花了几天的时间来讨论他们需要了解的所有信息，而且如果他们有疑问，我们会随时为他们提供帮助。我们的团队由 4 名程序员（2 名程序员，2 名设计师）组成，我们都已连接到 TFS 2010，这是让他们使用 Visual Studio 的另一个原因。
任何值得薪水的设计师都应该能够弄清楚如何使用 Visual Studio 来编辑标记。
Our designers use Visual Studio 2010 for editing our MVC 3 views. It took a couple days of meetings to just go over all the information they needed to know, plus we're here to help them if they have questions. We're on a team of 4 (2 programmers, 2 designers) and we're all plugged in to TFS 2010, which is another reason to have them on Visual Studio.
There's no reason any designer worth their salary shouldn't be able to figure out how to use Visual Studio for editing markup.
问题是，进行设计工作的用户在不实际运行应用程序的情况下永远无法预览视图的外观。所以基本上他们只需要一个好的文本编辑器，而 Visual Studio 和这里的任何编辑器一样好。
好处是您可以在运行时更改视图并刷新页面，您将看到所做的更改，这会导致非常高效的
do markup ->刷新开发循环。The problem is the user doing the design work will never get a preview of what the view looks like without actually running the app. So basically they just need a good text editor, and Visual Studio is just as good as any here.
The nice thing is you can alter a view at runtime and refresh the page and you'll see your changes, which leads to a pretty efficient
do markup -> refreshdevelopment loop.我同意这里其他人的观点，即 Visual Studio 是可行的方法，但如果出于某种原因您不想使用 Visual Studio，那么 WebMatrix 可能是未来的替代选项，但它目前仅支持 Razor 视图。它作为一种编辑视图、HTML、CSS、JavaScript 等的快速而简单的方法被低估了。
I agree with the others here that Visual Studio is the way to go but if there's some reason you don't want to use Visual Studio then WebMatrix maybe an alternative option in the future, but it currently only supports Razor views. It's underrated as a quick and simple way of editing Views, HTML, CSS, JavaScript etc.