具有指定精度的牛顿法

发布于 2024-10-17 06:09:15 字数 2608 浏览 3 评论 0原文

我正在尝试用 Java 编写一个函数来计算数字的 n 次方根。我正在使用牛顿法。但是,用户应该能够指定他们想要的精度位数。这是我遇到麻烦的部分,因为我的答案通常不完全正确。相关代码在这里:http://pastebin.com/d3rdpLW8。我如何修复此代码,使其始终给出至少 p 位精度的答案? (无需做不必要的工作)

import java.util.Random;

public final class Compute {

    private Compute() {
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Random rand = new Random(1230);
        for (int i = 0; i < 500000; i++) {
            double k = rand.nextDouble()/100;
            int n = (int)(rand.nextDouble() * 20) + 1;
            int p = (int)(rand.nextDouble() * 10) + 1;
            double math = n == 0 ? 1d : Math.pow(k, 1d / n);
            double compute = Compute.root(n, k, p);
            if(!String.format("%."+p+"f", math).equals(String.format("%."+p+"f", compute))) {
                System.out.println(String.format("%."+p+"f", math));
                System.out.println(String.format("%."+p+"f", compute));
                System.out.println(math + " " + compute + " " + p);
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Returns the n-th root of a positive double k, accurate to p decimal
     * digits.
     * 
     * @param n
     *            the degree of the root.
     * @param k
     *            the number to be rooted.
     * @param p
     *            the decimal digit precision.
     * @return the n-th root of k
     */
    public static double root(int n, double k, int p) {     
        double epsilon = pow(0.1, p+2);
        double approx = estimate_root(n, k);
        double approx_prev;

        do {
            approx_prev = approx;
            // f(x) / f'(x) = (x^n - k) / (n * x^(n-1)) = (x - k/x^(n-1)) / n
            approx -= (approx - k / pow(approx, n-1)) / n;
        } while (abs(approx - approx_prev) > epsilon);
        return approx;
    }

    private static double pow(double x, int y) {
        if (y == 0)
            return 1d;
        if (y == 1)
            return x;
        double k = pow(x * x, y >> 1);
        return (y & 1) == 0 ? k : k * x;
    }

    private static double abs(double x) {
        return Double.longBitsToDouble((Double.doubleToLongBits(x) << 1) >>> 1);
    }

    private static double estimate_root(int n, double k) {
        // Extract the exponent from k.
        long exp = (Double.doubleToLongBits(k) & 0x7ff0000000000000L);
        // Format the exponent properly.
        int D = (int) ((exp >> 52) - 1023);
        // Calculate and return 2^(D/n).
        return Double.longBitsToDouble((D / n + 1023L) << 52);
    }
}

I'm trying to write a function in Java that calculates the n-th root of a number. I'm using Newton's method for this. However, the user should be able to specify how many digits of precision they want. This is the part with which I'm having trouble, as my answer is often not entirely correct. The relevant code is here: http://pastebin.com/d3rdpLW8. How could I fix this code so that it always gives the answer to at least p digits of precision? (without doing more work than is necessary)

import java.util.Random;

public final class Compute {

    private Compute() {
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Random rand = new Random(1230);
        for (int i = 0; i < 500000; i++) {
            double k = rand.nextDouble()/100;
            int n = (int)(rand.nextDouble() * 20) + 1;
            int p = (int)(rand.nextDouble() * 10) + 1;
            double math = n == 0 ? 1d : Math.pow(k, 1d / n);
            double compute = Compute.root(n, k, p);
            if(!String.format("%."+p+"f", math).equals(String.format("%."+p+"f", compute))) {
                System.out.println(String.format("%."+p+"f", math));
                System.out.println(String.format("%."+p+"f", compute));
                System.out.println(math + " " + compute + " " + p);
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Returns the n-th root of a positive double k, accurate to p decimal
     * digits.
     * 
     * @param n
     *            the degree of the root.
     * @param k
     *            the number to be rooted.
     * @param p
     *            the decimal digit precision.
     * @return the n-th root of k
     */
    public static double root(int n, double k, int p) {     
        double epsilon = pow(0.1, p+2);
        double approx = estimate_root(n, k);
        double approx_prev;

        do {
            approx_prev = approx;
            // f(x) / f'(x) = (x^n - k) / (n * x^(n-1)) = (x - k/x^(n-1)) / n
            approx -= (approx - k / pow(approx, n-1)) / n;
        } while (abs(approx - approx_prev) > epsilon);
        return approx;
    }

    private static double pow(double x, int y) {
        if (y == 0)
            return 1d;
        if (y == 1)
            return x;
        double k = pow(x * x, y >> 1);
        return (y & 1) == 0 ? k : k * x;
    }

    private static double abs(double x) {
        return Double.longBitsToDouble((Double.doubleToLongBits(x) << 1) >>> 1);
    }

    private static double estimate_root(int n, double k) {
        // Extract the exponent from k.
        long exp = (Double.doubleToLongBits(k) & 0x7ff0000000000000L);
        // Format the exponent properly.
        int D = (int) ((exp >> 52) - 1023);
        // Calculate and return 2^(D/n).
        return Double.longBitsToDouble((D / n + 1023L) << 52);
    }
}

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

も星光 2024-10-24 06:09:15

如果您想要 4 位小数的精度,只需迭代直到更新小于 0.0001。

也就是说,如果您想要 n 位精度,请将 epsilon 设置为 Math.pow(10, -n)

Just iterate until the update is less than say, 0.0001, if you want a precision of 4 decimals.

That is, set your epsilon to Math.pow(10, -n) if you want n digits of precision.

迷你仙 2024-10-24 06:09:15

我们回想一下牛顿法的误差分析是怎么说的。基本上,它为我们提供了第 n 次迭代的误差作为第 n-1 次迭代误差的函数。

那么,我们如何判断误差是否小于k呢?我们不能,除非我们知道 e(0) 处的错误。如果我们知道 e(0) 处的错误,我们就可以用它来找到正确的答案。

你能做的就是说“e(0) <= m”。然后您可以找到 n 使得 e(n) <= k 为您想要的 k。然而,这需要知道半径中 f'' 的最大值,这(通常)与求 x 截距一样困难。

您要检查的是误差变化是否小于 k,这是一种完全可以接受的方法。但它不会检查误差是否小于 k。正如 Axel 和其他人所指出的,还有许多其他根近似算法,其中一些会产生更容易的错误分析,如果您确实想要这个,您应该使用其中之一。

Let's recall what the error analysis of Newton's method says. Basically, it gives us an error for the nth iteration as a function of the error of the n-1 th iteration.

So, how can we tell if the error is less than k? We can't, unless we know the error at e(0). And if we knew the error at e(0), we would just use that to find the correct answer.

What you can do is say "e(0) <= m". You can then find n such that e(n) <= k for your desired k. However, this requires knowing the maximal value of f'' in your radius, which is (in general) just as hard a problem as finding the x intercept.

What you're checking is if the error changes by less than k, which is a perfectly acceptable way to do it. But it's not checking if the error is less than k. As Axel and others have noted, there are many other root-approximation algorithms, some of which will yield easier error analysis, and if you really want this, you should use one of those.

寄人书 2024-10-24 06:09:15

您的代码中有错误。您的 pow() 方法的最后一行应为
返回 (y & 1) == 1 ? k : k * x;
而不是
return (y & 1) == 0 ? k:k*x;

You have a bug in your code. Your pow() method's last line should read
return (y & 1) == 1 ? k : k * x;
rather than
return (y & 1) == 0 ? k : k * x;

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文