"...seams entirely geared towards the GCC toolchain."
That is an understatemant. Blas is highly "optimized" to complile under one, specific, version of gcc, 2.4.3??.
It would, perhaps, be possible , starting with the un-optimized version of the source, to compile with the OpenWatcom toolchain, so as to generate 32 bit OMF but, I fear, much foo would be involved and the result would be dead slow code.
发布评论
评论（1）
“...接缝完全适合 GCC 工具链。”
这是轻描淡写的说法。 Blas 经过高度“优化”，可在 gcc 的一个特定版本 2.4.3?? 下进行编译。
也许，可以从未优化的源代码版本开始，使用 OpenWatcom 工具链进行编译，从而生成 32 位 OMF，但是，我担心，会涉及很多 foo 并且结果会非常慢代码。
"...seams entirely geared towards the GCC toolchain."
That is an understatemant. Blas is highly "optimized" to complile under one, specific, version of gcc, 2.4.3??.
It would, perhaps, be possible , starting with the un-optimized version of the source, to compile with the OpenWatcom toolchain, so as to generate 32 bit OMF but, I fear, much foo would be involved and the result would be dead slow code.