了解 Mercurial 分支

发布于 2024-10-16 05:32:57 字数 1307 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我正在学习 Mercurial,我去提交了一些更改,我收到了“创建新头”的消息——尽管我可以发誓在做新工作之前我做了一个 hg pull 和一个 hg update。

然后我感到困惑,所以我进行了合并,试图摆脱困境。我正在处理的单个文件很好(当我尝试学习 HG 时,我再次只使用一个文件)。我无法发布我的图像(没有足够的点),但我尝试在下面重新创建它。

当我创建标签 seo_v_1.0 时,我是否自动创建了一个分支?在其他 hg 存储库中,我只需创建一个标签,推送更改并继续。

有人可以帮我破译我在这里做了什么吗?在合并之前我对存储库所做的唯一更改是我提交了“最多 33 个”变更集。那么,根据下面的分支图,也许我已经在分支中但不知道了? 创建标签 seo_v_1.0 是否无意中创建了一个分支?

提前致谢。

请注意,该行从“seo_v_1.0”开始到“已添加标签..”,该行在“最多 33”处返回到“默认提示合并事物”

  • 默认提示合并事物[这是黄色的][并且默认为绿色]
    • 最多 33
    • 为变更集 xxxx 添加了标签 seo_v_1.1
    • seo_v1.1 清除了颜色 [这是黄色的]
    • 为变更集 xxxx 添加了标记 seo_v_1.0
  • seo_v_1.0-已完成 [这是黄色]
  • seo 通过第 2 节
  • seo交叉引用完成
  • 初始提交

编辑:添加了 glog 输出

@ changeset: 9:8637aa6d738f 
|\ tag: tip 
| | parent: 8: 
| | parent: 7: 
| | 
| | summary: merge thing 
| | 
| o changeset: 8: 
| | parent: 4: 
| | 
| | summary: up to 33 
| | 
o | changeset: 7: 
| | 
| | summary: Added tag seo_v_1.1 for changeset de5f8c81840f 
| | 
o | changeset: 6: 
| | tag: seo_v_1.1 
| | 
| | 
| | summary: cleared left col colors 
| | 
o | changeset: 5: 
|/ 
| 
| summary: Added tag seo_v_1.0 for changeset c13bd5d3cc09 
| o changeset: 4: 
| tag: seo_v_1.0 
| 
| summary: -completed cross-reference

I'm learning mercurial and I went to commit some changes and I got the message along the lines of "new head created" -- though I could have sworn that I did an hg pull and an hg update prior to doing new work.

I then got confused so I did a merge to try to get out of the mess. The single file I'm working on is fine (again I'm using only one file as I try to learn HG). I can't post my image (not enough points) but I tried to recreate it below.

When I created the tag seo_v_1.0 did I automatically create a branch? In other hg repos I simply create a tag, push the changes and keep going.

Can someone help me decipher what I did here? The only change I made on the repo before the merge thing was that I committed the "up to 33" changset. So maybe -- according to my branch diagram here below -- I was already in the branch but didn't know it?
Did the creation of tag seo_v_1.0 inadvertently create a branch?

Thanks in advance.

Note that the line out starts from "seo_v_1.0" to "added tag.." and the line comes back in at "up to 33" to "default tip merge thing"

  • default tip merge thing [this is in yellow] [and default is in green]
    • up to 33
    • added tag seo_v_1.1 for changeset xxxx
    • seo_v1.1 cleared colors [this is in yellow]
    • added tag seo_v_1.0 for changeset xxxx
  • seo_v_1.0-completed [this is in yellow]
  • seo through section 2
  • seo cross reference done
  • initial commit

Edit: glog output added

@ changeset: 9:8637aa6d738f 
|\ tag: tip 
| | parent: 8: 
| | parent: 7: 
| | 
| | summary: merge thing 
| | 
| o changeset: 8: 
| | parent: 4: 
| | 
| | summary: up to 33 
| | 
o | changeset: 7: 
| | 
| | summary: Added tag seo_v_1.1 for changeset de5f8c81840f 
| | 
o | changeset: 6: 
| | tag: seo_v_1.1 
| | 
| | 
| | summary: cleared left col colors 
| | 
o | changeset: 5: 
|/ 
| 
| summary: Added tag seo_v_1.0 for changeset c13bd5d3cc09 
| o changeset: 4: 
| tag: seo_v_1.0 
| 
| summary: -completed cross-reference

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

待"谢繁草 2024-10-23 05:32:57

您能否向我们展示启用 graphlog 扩展后“hg glog”的输出?

hg --config extensions.graphlog="" glog

您可以删除大部分更改,但请至少保留足够的更改以显示:

  • 标签操作
  • 您所做的合并

Can you show us the output of "hg glog" with the graphlog extension enabled?

hg --config extensions.graphlog="" glog

You can strip most of the changes, but please leave at least enough changes to show:

  • The tag operation
  • The merge you did
并安 2024-10-23 05:32:57

创建标签肯定不会创建命名分支,但它可能会创建匿名分支,因为该行为会修改 .hgtags 文件,然后提交。

快速阅读一下本文;它非常有帮助:

http://stevelosh.com/ blog/2009/08/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial/

我确信通过 Giorgos 请求的 hg glog 输出,我们可以帮助您弄清楚发生了什么,但从中可以有更多的了解指南您可能会亲自看到。

Creating a tag definitely didn't create a named branch, but it could have created an anonymous branch, because the act modifies the .hgtags file and then commits.

Give this a quick read; it's immensely helpful:

http://stevelosh.com/blog/2009/08/a-guide-to-branching-in-mercurial/

I'm sure with the hg glog output Giorgos requested we can help you figure out what happened, but with a little more understanding from that guide you'll probably see it yourself.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文