不要让 PC-BSD 中的 KDE 影响您太多，不同的 KDE 东西应该在其所有端口树中可用。或者尝试暂时没有 KDE 或 Gnome 的生活。
I found the 'right virtual machine' requires some tinkering. VirtualBox ran Plan9 really slowly, qemu+kvm ran it hundreds of times faster. qemu+kvm also ran an Ubuntu guest at what felt like faster-than-hardware (at least for booting :) but I've read accounts from people that say the exact opposite, that VirtualBox outpaced qemu+kvm. Test them both :) that way you get the experience, and can know which one is more usable for your environments.
As for the BSDs, I ran OpenBSD for years and really liked it. You probably can't go wrong with FreeBSD. Learning both wouldn't be a bad idea -- they have different feature sets and excel at different tasks.
Don't let KDE in PC-BSD sway you too much, the different KDE things ought to be available in all their ports trees. Or try life without KDE or Gnome for a while.
我还尝试过将 NetBSD 作为 VirtualBox 来宾。它“有效”（对于某些工作定义），但您必须使用“vboxsdl.exe --nopatm --startvm [machine]”之类的内容启动虚拟机。这对我在一个 Windows 机器上有效，但在另一台机器上无效。我没有抽出时间来看看 X 是否有效。
我没有尝试过 OpenBSD，但我似乎记得那里有图像，所以它应该在某种程度上起作用。
我没有使用其他虚拟化软件的经验，因此无法为您提供帮助。
I run FreeBSD 8-STABLE guests in VirtualBox 4.0.4, running on Windows (XP & 7) systems. It works, but there are some caveats. Seamless mode (which you might use with Linuxen) doesn't work, and it takes some configuring to get things set up exactly right. See http://wiki.freebsd.org/VirtualBox for the settings you need.
I played with virtualized PC-BSD, and it worked about the same as FreeBSD, since it is FreeBSD. PC-BSD has some nice features for the newbie to take some of the pain out of installing software.
I have also tried NetBSD as a VirtualBox guest. It "works" (for some definitions of work), but you have to launch the VM with something along the line of "vboxsdl.exe --nopatm --startvm [machine]". This worked for me on one Windows box but not on another. I didn't get around to seeing if X works.
I have not tried OpenBSD, but I seem to recall there being images out there, so it should work to some degree.
I don't have experience with other virtualization software, so can't help you there.
发布评论
评论（2）
我发现“正确的虚拟机”需要一些修改。 VirtualBox 运行 Plan9 的速度非常很慢，而 qemu+kvm 的运行速度快了数百倍。 qemu+kvm 还运行了一个 Ubuntu guest，感觉比硬件更快（至少在启动方面是这样：），但我读过一些人的说法，他们的说法完全相反，VirtualBox 超过了 qemu+kvm。对它们进行测试:)，这样您就可以获得经验，并且可以知道哪一个更适合您的环境。
至于 BSD，我运行 OpenBSD 多年并且非常喜欢它。使用 FreeBSD 可能不会出错。学习两者并不是一个坏主意——它们具有不同的功能集并且擅长不同的任务。
不要让 PC-BSD 中的 KDE 影响您太多，不同的 KDE 东西应该在其所有端口树中可用。或者尝试暂时没有 KDE 或 Gnome 的生活。
I found the 'right virtual machine' requires some tinkering. VirtualBox ran Plan9 really slowly, qemu+kvm ran it hundreds of times faster. qemu+kvm also ran an Ubuntu guest at what felt like faster-than-hardware (at least for booting :) but I've read accounts from people that say the exact opposite, that VirtualBox outpaced qemu+kvm. Test them both :) that way you get the experience, and can know which one is more usable for your environments.
As for the BSDs, I ran OpenBSD for years and really liked it. You probably can't go wrong with FreeBSD. Learning both wouldn't be a bad idea -- they have different feature sets and excel at different tasks.
Don't let KDE in PC-BSD sway you too much, the different KDE things ought to be available in all their ports trees. Or try life without KDE or Gnome for a while.
我在 VirtualBox 4.0.4 中运行 FreeBSD 8-STABLE guest 虚拟机，在 Windows（XP 和 7）系统上运行。它有效，但有一些警告。无缝模式（您可能会在 Linuxen 中使用）不起作用，需要进行一些配置才能使设置完全正确。请参阅 http://wiki.freebsd.org/VirtualBox 了解您需要的设置。
我玩过虚拟化的 PC-BSD，它的工作方式与 FreeBSD 大致相同，因为它是 FreeBSD。 PC-BSD 有一些不错的功能，可以帮助新手减轻安装软件的痛苦。
我还尝试过将 NetBSD 作为 VirtualBox 来宾。它“有效”（对于某些工作定义），但您必须使用“vboxsdl.exe --nopatm --startvm [machine]”之类的内容启动虚拟机。这对我在一个 Windows 机器上有效，但在另一台机器上无效。我没有抽出时间来看看 X 是否有效。
我没有尝试过 OpenBSD，但我似乎记得那里有图像，所以它应该在某种程度上起作用。
我没有使用其他虚拟化软件的经验，因此无法为您提供帮助。
I run FreeBSD 8-STABLE guests in VirtualBox 4.0.4, running on Windows (XP & 7) systems. It works, but there are some caveats. Seamless mode (which you might use with Linuxen) doesn't work, and it takes some configuring to get things set up exactly right. See http://wiki.freebsd.org/VirtualBox for the settings you need.
I played with virtualized PC-BSD, and it worked about the same as FreeBSD, since it is FreeBSD. PC-BSD has some nice features for the newbie to take some of the pain out of installing software.
I have also tried NetBSD as a VirtualBox guest. It "works" (for some definitions of work), but you have to launch the VM with something along the line of "vboxsdl.exe --nopatm --startvm [machine]". This worked for me on one Windows box but not on another. I didn't get around to seeing if X works.
I have not tried OpenBSD, but I seem to recall there being images out there, so it should work to some degree.
I don't have experience with other virtualization software, so can't help you there.