数据库设计 - 我应该使用哪种设计？两种选择
我正在使用 PostgreSQL 设计数据库架构。我对应该使用哪种设计有一些疑问。
表tdir_details_uris_text将有数百万个寄存器，每个关键domain、uri、id_language将有大约10/ 20 个寄存器。
哪种设计应该表现良好？ 3桌设计还是2桌设计？
最好的问候，
PS：抱歉我的英语不好。
更新：仅添加 INSERT INTO 示例
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'title_webpage', '1', '2009 Ford Mustang GT');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '1', 'No Accidents / Damage Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '2', 'No Airbag Deployment Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '3', 'Vehicle Qualifies for the CARFAX Buyback Guarantee');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '4', 'No Structural/Frame Damage Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '5', 'No Manufacturer Recalls Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '6', 'No Indication of an Odometer Rollback');
I'm designing a database schema using PostgreSQL. I have some doubts about which design should I use.
The table tdir_details_uris_text will have many millions of registers, each key domain, uri, id_language will have about 10/20 registers.
Which design should perform well? The 3 tables design or the 2 tables design?
Best Regards,
PS: Sorry for my poor English.
Update: Just to add an INSERT INTO example
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'title_webpage', '1', '2009 Ford Mustang GT');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '1', 'No Accidents / Damage Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '2', 'No Airbag Deployment Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '3', 'Vehicle Qualifies for the CARFAX Buyback Guarantee');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '4', 'No Structural/Frame Damage Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '5', 'No Manufacturer Recalls Reported to CARFAX');
insert into tdir_details_uris_text (domain, uri, id_language, id_categorie, id_data, id_ordinal, n_text) values ('motors.shop.ebay.com', 'http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2009-FORD-MUSTANG-GT-BLACK-BEAUTY-16K-MILES-WOW-/230580626087?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item35afad22a7', 'en', '23', 'highlights', '6', 'No Indication of an Odometer Rollback');
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
听起来像是多对多关系，这需要三表设计。
但我不认为这是你展示的设计。我没有看到正确的主键关系。
表 A 将 ID_A 作为主键。
表 B 将 ID_B 作为主键。
JOIN 表 AB 将具有主键 ID_A、ID_B；每一个都分别是表 A 和表 B 的外键。
Sounds like a many-to-many relationship, which would require a three table design.
But I don't think it's the design you show. I don't see the correct primary key relationship.
Table A would have ID_A as primary key.
Table B would have ID_B as primary key.
The JOIN Table AB would have primary key ID_A, ID_B; each one would be a foreign key into Table A and B, respectively.
我可以看到选项 1 中的“tdirs_uris_text”表没有任何用途（如果您的整个设计中只有两个表）。要问的问题是“tdirs_uris_text”中的主键是否会在不同的表上多次使用（作为外键）。具体来说，是否会出现“details”表中“uris”外键多次出现的情况？如果是这样，选项 1 更好，否则选项 2 是首选。
Your "tdirs_uris_text" table in option 1 has no purpose that I can see (if you only have the two tables in your entire design). The question to ask is whether the primary key in "tdirs_uris_text" will ever be used multiple times on a different table (as a foreign key). Specifically, would there ever be a case where the "details" table has the "uris" foreign key appear multiple times? If so option 1 is better otherwise option 2 is preferred.