Wiki 的开源声誉系统
我正在考虑创建一个专门的wiki。我认为拥有一个声誉系统会大大增加用户在这样的网站上的积极性。 原始维基百科确实有一个信誉系统，但它无法与 stackexchange 网络上使用的系统相比。
因此我的问题是：
是否有像 stackexchange 使用的那样的 Wiki 开源信誉系统？
I am playing around with the idea of starting a specialized wiki. I think having a reputation system would greatly increase the user's motivation on such a site. The original wikipedia does indeed have a reputation system but it is not comparable to the one used on the stackexchange network.
Hence my question:
Is there an open-source reputation system for Wiki's like the one used at stackexchange?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
恕我直言，很难以这种方式计算真正的 Wiki 的声誉。如果您让用户为文章投票，您如何在编辑之间分配这种声誉？编辑计数后？添加后的字节数是多少？这两种变体都可以用来获得更多的声誉，但这不会改善文章。这就是为什么我对此会非常小心。
IMHO it is very hard to calculate reputation for a real Wiki in the SO-way. If you let the users vote for articles, how you distribute this reputation amongst the editors? After the count of edits? After the amount of added bytes? Both variants could be played to gain more reputation, and that wouldn't improve the article. That's why I would be very careful about that.
该论文的作者为 WikiTrust 项目做出了贡献。虽然它在功能上不像“SO”，但它的“批处理模式”似乎可能会有所帮助。它演示了如何提取文章的详细作者历史记录。在“在线模式”下使用 WikiTrust 将为所有页面添加信誉编码。
The authors of that paper contributed work to the WikiTrust project. While it is not "SO" like in function, it's "batch mode" seems like it might be helpful. It demonstrates extraction of detailed author history for an article. Using WikiTrust in "online mode" would add reputation coding to all the pages.